[pacman-dev] [PATCH] libalpm: yet another fix for conflits&provides
hi
http://darcs.frugalware.org/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=pacman;a=plain_commitdif...;
the scenario is the following: pkg B provides and conflicts with pkg A pkg E depends on pkg C and pkg D pkg C depends on pkg A and pkg D depends on pkg B so during a -S E, pkg A should be removed from the target list
no log message needed we already have: debug: package 'xespgs' provides its own conflict flow2: removing 'espgs' from target list which should be enough imho
applies to the latest Arch cvs
maybe it would be good to create a test for this scenario
udv / greetings, VMiklos
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:03:34PM +0200, VMiklos vmiklos@frugalware.org wrote:
http://darcs.frugalware.org/darcsweb/darcsweb.cgi?r=pacman;a=plain_commitdif...;
the scenario is the following: pkg B provides and conflicts with pkg A pkg E depends on pkg C and pkg D pkg C depends on pkg A and pkg D depends on pkg B so during a -S E, pkg A should be removed from the target list
also this patch will make test "sync898" fail, but i think the right action is the new one, if the patch committed, then you should update the test, too
udv / greetings, VMiklos
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 08:23:26PM +0200, VMiklos vmiklos@frugalware.org wrote:
also this patch will make test "sync898" fail, but i think the right action is the new one, if the patch committed, then you should update the test, too
huch, where is Judd an Aurelien? :) no mail from them since two and a half week... :S
udv / greetings, VMiklos
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:44:44PM +0200, VMiklos wrote:
huch, where is Judd an Aurelien? :) no mail from them since two and a half week... :S
Still around. :) Just very busy lately. Will try to catch up when I can.
- J
participants (2)
-
Judd Vinet
-
VMiklos