[pacman-dev] more universal testdb -- bugs in our sync repos
Hi!
Imho that would be helpful if testdb were more flexible.
This may not be the proper ML (but I'm sure that reporting bugs is better than being silent), but I made some tests on sync repos, and I found the following inconsistencies in our sync dbs, mostly in community (I have only core, extra, community "enabled"):
Unsatisfied dependencies: ------------------------- firefox-i18n -> firefox-i18n=2.0.0.9 dfm -> xfree86 fvwm-themes-devel -> fvwm-devel icomplete -> vim-devel perl-xml-feed -> perl-datetime-format-mail -> perl-datetime>=0.1705 perl-xml-rss -> perl-datetime-format-mail -> perl-datetime>=0.1705 perl-datetime-format-strptime -> perl-datetime>=0.1402 portaudio_cpp -> portaudio
Strange dependency (cycle): --------------------------- archboot->archboot
Some of them (like firefox-i18n) is not actual yet, but these things could be tested by a clever app (a modified testdb for internal use) to avoid these bugs.
Bye, ngaba
---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:28:02PM +0100, Nagy Gabor wrote:
Hi!
Imho that would be helpful if testdb were more flexible.
This may not be the proper ML (but I'm sure that reporting bugs is better than being silent), but I made some tests on sync repos, and I found the following inconsistencies in our sync dbs, mostly in community (I have only core, extra, community "enabled"):
Unsatisfied dependencies:
firefox-i18n -> firefox-i18n=2.0.0.9 dfm -> xfree86 fvwm-themes-devel -> fvwm-devel icomplete -> vim-devel perl-xml-feed -> perl-datetime-format-mail -> perl-datetime>=0.1705 perl-xml-rss -> perl-datetime-format-mail -> perl-datetime>=0.1705 perl-datetime-format-strptime -> perl-datetime>=0.1402 portaudio_cpp -> portaudio
Strange dependency (cycle):
archboot->archboot
Some of them (like firefox-i18n) is not actual yet, but these things could be tested by a clever app (a modified testdb for internal use) to avoid these bugs.
You may want to have a look at this : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-November/016238.html
You may want to have a look at this : http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-November/016238.html
Wow, thanks, this looks cool. Unfortunately I don't really familiar in python, but circular deps checking looks interesting. Bye
---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
participants (2)
-
Nagy Gabor
-
Xavier