[pacman-dev] [GIT] pacman branch, master now at v3.0.0-254-g78bac81
Hello, This is an automated email from the git hooks/update script, it was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository. Updating branch, master, via 78bac81a58355a6d42760e1974005dbcdd8e8dcf (commit) from 7daa6708d2afc710bebbb2dc30f4371f9d67120c (commit) - Log ----------------------------------------------------------------- commit 78bac81a58355a6d42760e1974005dbcdd8e8dcf Author: Andrew Fyfe <andrew@neptune-one.net> Date: Thu Jun 28 10:48:32 2007 +0100 scripts/makepkg.in: Don't include .PKGINFO etc in .FILELIST And move .PKGINFO and .FILELIST to be the first to files included in the package. Signed-off-by: Andrew Fyfe <andrew@neptune-one.net> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Diffstat: scripts/makepkg.in | 11 +++++++---- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) hooks/update --- Git Source Code Management System hooks/update refs/heads/master \ 7daa6708d2afc710bebbb2dc30f4371f9d67120c \ 78bac81a58355a6d42760e1974005dbcdd8e8dcf
committer Andrew Fyfe <andrew@neptune-one.net> Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:45:12 +0000 (13:45 +0100) So, Andrew can now commit directly into official git? ;-) Hurray! :-) -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
committer Andrew Fyfe <andrew@neptune-one.net> Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:45:12 +0000 (13:45 +0100)
So, Andrew can now commit directly into official git? ;-) Hurray! :-)
I can? The e-mail headers say it came from Dan, not sure how/why git used my e-mail address in the from line, maybe it's because it was a single patch authored and signed off by me? Andrew
On 6/28/07, Andrew Fyfe <andrew@neptune-one.net> wrote:
Roman Kyrylych wrote:
committer Andrew Fyfe <andrew@neptune-one.net> Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:45:12 +0000 (13:45 +0100)
So, Andrew can now commit directly into official git? ;-) Hurray! :-)
I can?
The e-mail headers say it came from Dan, not sure how/why git used my e-mail address in the from line, maybe it's because it was a single patch authored and signed off by me?
Wow, I noticed this when I committed too, didn't think it would draw the response. :) Yeah, it is because Andrew was the sole committer (NOT just author). I'm not sure where GIT normally grabs it from, but if I cherry-pick or rebase one of the branches, I become the committer, so most of the emails come from me becasue of that. This time I didn't have to do that so look what happens. -Dan
participants (3)
-
Andrew Fyfe
-
Dan McGee
-
Roman Kyrylych