[pacman-dev] [PATCH] makepkg: simplify run_pacman logic
We don't need to check the options twice, since it is the same check both times. Instead, merge the conditionals. As far as I can tell, the only reason the checks for: - PACMAN_OPTS and - whether to use sudo were ever separated is due to the historic existence of --asroot, since the second check included a check for (( ! ASROOT )) until it was cleaned up in commit 61ba5c961e4a3536c4bbf41edb348987a9993fdb. Signed-off-by: Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@archlinux.org> --- scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in index 25700b09..c51fec45 100644 --- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in +++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in @@ -217,12 +217,10 @@ missing_source_file() { run_pacman() { local cmd - if [[ $1 != -@(T|Q)*([[:alpha:]]) ]]; then - cmd=("$PACMAN_PATH" "${PACMAN_OPTS[@]}" "$@") - else + if [[ $1 = -@(T|Q)*([[:alpha:]]) ]]; then cmd=("$PACMAN_PATH" "$@") - fi - if [[ $1 != -@(T|Q)*([[:alpha:]]) ]]; then + else + cmd=("$PACMAN_PATH" "${PACMAN_OPTS[@]}" "$@") if type -p sudo >/dev/null; then cmd=(sudo "${cmd[@]}") else -- 2.20.1
On 21/2/19 11:55 am, Eli Schwartz wrote:
We don't need to check the options twice, since it is the same check both times. Instead, merge the conditionals.
As far as I can tell, the only reason the checks for:
- PACMAN_OPTS and - whether to use sudo
were ever separated is due to the historic existence of --asroot, since the second check included a check for (( ! ASROOT )) until it was cleaned up in commit 61ba5c961e4a3536c4bbf41edb348987a9993fdb.
OK - I'm not going to look at the history of that function to see who to blame... :D A
participants (2)
-
Allan McRae
-
Eli Schwartz