[pacman-dev] Doc bug in PKGBUILD(5)
Hi, I was reading the online HTML man page, and noticed a doc bug. Here's the relevant section, verbatim, except I put **** around the bug: ===== Using VCS Sources Building a developmental version of a package using sources from a version control system (VCS) is enabled by specifying the source in the form source=('folder::url#fragment'). Currently makepkg supports the bzr, git, hg and svn protocols. The source URL is divided into three components: folder (optional) Specifies an alternate folder name for makepkg to download the VCS source into. url The url to the VCS repo. This must include ****the the**** vcs in the URL protocol for makepkg to recognize this as a VCS source. If the protocol does not include the VCS name, it can be added by prefixing the URL with vcs+. For example, using a git repository over http would have a source URL in the form git+http://.... ===== A double 'the' is present. Thanks, Eric -- Sent from my Android device. -- Sent from my Android device.
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 00:23:49 -0500 Eric Côté <ericcotelnu@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I was reading the online HTML man page, and noticed a doc bug.
Here's the relevant section, verbatim, except I put **** around the bug:
===== Using VCS Sources
Building a developmental version of a package using sources from a version control system (VCS) is enabled by specifying the source in the form source=('folder::url#fragment'). Currently makepkg supports the bzr, git, hg and svn protocols.
The source URL is divided into three components:
folder
(optional) Specifies an alternate folder name for makepkg to download the VCS source into. url
The url to the VCS repo. This must include ****the the**** vcs in the URL protocol for makepkg to recognize this as a VCS source. If the protocol does not include the VCS name, it can be added by prefixing the URL with vcs+. For example, using a git repository over http would have a source URL in the form git+http://.... =====
A double 'the' is present.
Thanks, Eric
Why not check the actual man page? Or at least the Git repo? This was fixed nearly 2 years ago. Don't trust the information you're seeing on that web site. Doug
participants (2)
-
Doug Newgard
-
Eric Côté