[pacman-dev] [PATCH] Add `build/` to gitignore
Since it's a transient directory for build artifacts, nothing in there will ever been committed. Ignoring it also makes IDEs happier during file search. Signed-off-by: Colin Woodbury <colin@fosskers.ca> --- .gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 01975fd2..638dfe39 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ *~ *.o pacman-*.tar.gz +build/* -- 2.29.2
On 12/9/20 2:14 PM, Colin Woodbury wrote:
Since it's a transient directory for build artifacts, nothing in there will ever been committed. Ignoring it also makes IDEs happier during file search.
Signed-off-by: Colin Woodbury <colin@fosskers.ca> --- .gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 01975fd2..638dfe39 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ *~ *.o pacman-*.tar.gz +build/*
I use builddir/ (and upstream usually recommends that these days since it's less likely to confuse "meson builddir" as a subcommand, compared to "meson build"). This is kind of the problem with trying to ignore a directory that isn't canonical. Instead, I'd prefer to argue upstream in favor of https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/6509 -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Right, having `meson` do it automatically would work well. I put forth the patch in the first place because the instructions on the Pacman website (master branch), if followed, place the artifacts in `build/`. Other newcomers to the project like me would hit the same thing, so some automated solution would be nice. Is there anything we can do to move that `meson` proposal forward, other than complaining loudly? ;) Colin On Thu, 10 Dec 2020, at 17:42, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 12/9/20 2:14 PM, Colin Woodbury wrote:
Since it's a transient directory for build artifacts, nothing in there will ever been committed. Ignoring it also makes IDEs happier during file search.
Signed-off-by: Colin Woodbury <colin@fosskers.ca> --- .gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 01975fd2..638dfe39 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ *~ *.o pacman-*.tar.gz +build/*
I use builddir/ (and upstream usually recommends that these days since it's less likely to confuse "meson builddir" as a subcommand, compared to "meson build").
This is kind of the problem with trying to ignore a directory that isn't canonical.
Instead, I'd prefer to argue upstream in favor of https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/6509
-- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
*Attachments:* * OpenPGP_signature
On 10 Dec 2020, at 6:12 pm -0800, Colin Woodbury wrote:
Right, having `meson` do it automatically would work well. I put forth the patch in the first place because the instructions on the Pacman website (master branch), if followed, place the artifacts in `build/`. Other newcomers to the project like me would hit the same thing, so some automated solution would be nice.
If I may propose an alternative, this seems like an ideal use for .../pacman/.git/info/exclude. For those who don't know, .git/info/exclude is a secondary gitignore file not under version control. It is specifically for files that shouldn't be ignored at the project level, but that an individual developer or user might want to ignore--such as for build artifacts in non-standardized places, or your personal wrapper scripts for testing whatever you're working on. Cheers, Ivy
On 12/10/20 9:40 PM, Ivy Foster wrote:
On 10 Dec 2020, at 6:12 pm -0800, Colin Woodbury wrote:
Right, having `meson` do it automatically would work well. I put forth the patch in the first place because the instructions on the Pacman website (master branch), if followed, place the artifacts in `build/`. Other newcomers to the project like me would hit the same thing, so some automated solution would be nice.
If I may propose an alternative, this seems like an ideal use for .../pacman/.git/info/exclude.
For those who don't know, .git/info/exclude is a secondary gitignore file not under version control. It is specifically for files that shouldn't be ignored at the project level, but that an individual developer or user might want to ignore--such as for build artifacts in non-standardized places, or your personal wrapper scripts for testing whatever you're working on.
I do this in $HOME/.config/git/ignore since this pattern is shared by multiple meson-using projects and I can't imagine "builddir/" being actually used for non build artifacts. Still would be nice to autogenerate this on meson's side. I'm discussing it with them... -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
On 12/10/20 9:12 PM, Colin Woodbury wrote:
Right, having `meson` do it automatically would work well. I put forth the patch in the first place because the instructions on the Pacman website (master branch), if followed, place the artifacts in `build/`. Other newcomers to the project like me would hit the same thing, so some automated solution would be nice.
Is there anything we can do to move that `meson` proposal forward, other than complaining loudly? ;)
https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/8092 The proposal is getting traction. :D -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
And now it's merged! :) On Sat, 12 Dec 2020, at 17:01, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 12/10/20 9:12 PM, Colin Woodbury wrote:
Right, having `meson` do it automatically would work well. I put forth the patch in the first place because the instructions on the Pacman website (master branch), if followed, place the artifacts in `build/`. Other newcomers to the project like me would hit the same thing, so some automated solution would be nice.
Is there anything we can do to move that `meson` proposal forward, other than complaining loudly? ;)
https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/8092
The proposal is getting traction. :D
-- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
*Attachments:* * OpenPGP_signature
On 12/13/20 5:17 PM, Colin Woodbury wrote:
And now it's merged! :) Indeed, thanks for the prodding on this mailing list which made it happen. meson 0.57 will automatically ignore configured build directories.
Hence, this proposed patch is obsolete. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
Thank Eli, I'll keep an eye out for 0.57. Yup, this patch can be sent to the dustbin. Cheers, Colin On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, at 20:42, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 12/13/20 5:17 PM, Colin Woodbury wrote:
And now it's merged! :) Indeed, thanks for the prodding on this mailing list which made it happen. meson 0.57 will automatically ignore configured build directories.
Hence, this proposed patch is obsolete.
-- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
*Attachments:* * OpenPGP_signature
participants (3)
-
Colin Woodbury
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Ivy Foster