On 12/06/11 12:13, Simon Gomizelj wrote:

Hi,

First of all, I'd like to say that this is both my first patch ever to an upstream project and my first time posting on a development mailing list.

Great to see a new contributor. Hopefully the much delayed reply here has not been too off-putting... General comments about the patch. I do not think setting REPO_PATH and REPO_DB in makepkg.conf is the way to go. I would prefer something like: makepkg --repo-add /path/to/repo.db.tar.gz That means I can manage multiple repos more easily on my machine. Note I also went for "-" in the middle of --repo-add for consistency with name of the script. I'm not sure about the need for the short "-a" option, but I could be convinced.

...

From 56ef40a2dbe42fafd32a152d102962d52e33e6f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Gomizelj<simongmzlj@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 21:16:11 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Added repo-add support.

Signed-off-by: Simon Gomizelj<simongmzlj@gmail.com> --- scripts/makepkg.sh.in | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in index b3081fc..348cb78 100644 --- a/scripts/makepkg.sh.in +++ b/scripts/makepkg.sh.in @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ INFAKEROOT=0 GENINTEG=0 SKIPINTEG=0 INSTALL=0 +REPOADD=0 NOBUILD=0 NODEPS=0 NOEXTRACT=0 @@ -401,6 +402,33 @@ run_pacman() { eval "$cmd" }

+run_repocp() { + local cmd + printf -v cmd "%q " "cp" -t $REPO_PATH "$@" + warning "$cmd" + if (( ! ASROOT )); then + if type -p sudo>/dev/null; then + cmd="sudo $cmd" + else + cmd="su root -c '$cmd'" + fi + fi + eval "$cmd" +} + +run_repoadd() { + local cmd + printf -v cmd "%q " "$REPO_ADD" $REPO_ADD_OPTS "$@" + if (( ! ASROOT )); then + if type -p sudo>/dev/null; then + cmd="sudo $cmd" + else + cmd="su root -c '$cmd'" + fi + fi + eval "$cmd" +}

I think there is no need for these two functions. If a user is managing a repo on their machine, we can just assume they have write permissions for that repo. In fact, we can just test that early on and error if the permissions do not allow this.

check_deps() { (( $#> 0 )) || return 0

@@ -1241,6 +1269,39 @@ install_package() { fi }

+repoadd_package() { + (( ! REPOADD ))&& return + + if (( ! SPLITPKG )); then + msg "$(gettext "Adding package %s to repo %s with %s...")" "$pkgname" "$REPO_DB" "$REPO_ADD" + else + msg "$(gettext "Adding %s package group to repo with %s...")" "$pkgbase" "$REPO_DB" "$REPO_ADD" + fi + + local fullver pkg pkglist repolist + for pkg in ${pkgname[@]}; do + # TODO: this wasn't properly fixed in commit 2020e629 + fullver=$(get_full_version $epoch $pkgver $pkgrel) + if [[ -f $PKGDEST/${pkg}-${fullver}-${CARCH}${PKGEXT} ]]; then + pkglist+=" $PKGDEST/${pkg}-${fullver}-${CARCH}${PKGEXT}" + repolist+=" $REPO_PATH/${pkg}-${fullver}-${CARCH}${PKGEXT}" + else + pkglist+=" $REPO_PATH/${pkg}-${fullver}-any${PKGEXT}"

That does not look right... but I think this will get cleaned up with removing the sudo/su checks above.

+ repolist+=" $REPO_PATH/${pkg}-${fullver}-any${PKGEXT}" + fi + done + + if ! run_repocp $pkglist; then + warning "$(gettext "Failed to copy package(s) to %s." "$REPO_PATH")" + return 0 + fi + + if ! run_repoadd $REPO_PATH/$REPO_DB $repolist; then + warning "$(gettext "Failed to add package(s) to repo %s." "$REPO_DB")" + return 0 + fi +} + check_sanity() { # check for no-no's in the build script local i @@ -1609,6 +1670,7 @@ usage() { echo "$(gettext " -g, --geninteg Generate integrity checks for source files")" echo "$(gettext " -h, --help Show this help message and exit")" echo "$(gettext " -i, --install Install package after successful build")" + echo "$(gettext " -a, --repoadd Add the package to a repo after successful build")"

This should alphabetically ordered. Again, I would stick to just --repo-add.

echo "$(gettext " -L, --log Log package build process")" echo "$(gettext " -m, --nocolor Disable colorized output messages")" echo "$(gettext " -o, --nobuild Download and extract files only")" @@ -1659,10 +1721,10 @@ fi ARGLIST=("$@")

# Parse Command Line Options. -OPT_SHORT="AcCdefFghiLmop:rRsV" +OPT_SHORT="AcCdefFghiaLmop:rRsV" OPT_LONG="allsource,asroot,ignorearch,check,clean,cleancache,nodeps" OPT_LONG+=",noextract,force,forcever:,geninteg,help,holdver" -OPT_LONG+=",install,key:,log,nocolor,nobuild,nocheck,nosign,pkg:,rmdeps" +OPT_LONG+=",install,repoadd,key:,log,nocolor,nobuild,nocheck,nosign,pkg:,rmdeps" OPT_LONG+=",repackage,skipinteg,sign,source,syncdeps,version,config:" # Pacman Options OPT_LONG+=",noconfirm,noprogressbar" @@ -1697,6 +1759,7 @@ while true; do -g|--geninteg) GENINTEG=1 ;; --holdver) HOLDVER=1 ;; -i|--install) INSTALL=1 ;; + -a|--repoadd) REPOADD=1 ;; --key) shift; GPGKEY=$1 ;; -L|--log) LOGGING=1 ;; -m|--nocolor) USE_COLOR='n' ;; @@ -1749,6 +1812,9 @@ fi # set pacman command if not already defined PACMAN=${PACMAN:-pacman}

+# set repoadd command if not already defined +REPO_ADD=${REPO_ADD:-repo-add} + # check if messages are to be printed using color unset ALL_OFF BOLD BLUE GREEN RED YELLOW if [[ -t 2&& ! $USE_COLOR = "n"&& $(check_buildenv color) = "y" ]]; then @@ -1970,6 +2036,10 @@ if (( ! SPLITPKG )); then warning "$(gettext "A package has already been built, installing existing package...")" install_package exit $? + elif (( REPOADD )); then

elif? I'm sure we can both install and add to a repo.

+ warning "$(gettext "A package has already been built, adding existing package...")" + repoadd_package + exit $? else error "$(gettext "A package has already been built. (use -f to overwrite)")" exit 1 @@ -1994,6 +2064,10 @@ else warning "$(gettext "The package group has already been built, installing existing packages...")" install_package exit $? + elif (( REPOADD )); then

and again

+ warning "$(gettext "The package group has already been built, adding existing packages...")" + repoadd_package + exit $? else error "$(gettext "The package group has already been built. (use -f to overwrite)")" exit 1 @@ -2174,7 +2248,11 @@ fi fullver=$(get_full_version $epoch $pkgver $pkgrel) msg "$(gettext "Finished making: %s")" "$pkgbase $fullver ($(date))"

-install_package +if (( INSTALL )); then + install_package +elif (( REPOADD )); then + repoadd_package +fi

Again, I do not understand the if/elif there at all... Overall, this looks a good first patch to me. Follow up the comments here and then we can get the documentation added and this looks a nice feature to add. Allan