On 16/07/13 13:41, Connor Behan wrote:

Users trying to keep a lightweight system often scan the list of targets for red flags. This just makes it easier for them.

Signed-off-by: Connor Behan <connor.behan@gmail.com> ---

This makes little sense to me. As a user I would not make the connection that highlighted packages are new dependencies. In fact, I would expect those to be the targets that are being updated if anything. And we already have VerbosePkgLists for people who want to monitor every detail of the update. Allan

src/pacman/util.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/pacman/util.c b/src/pacman/util.c index 23c4009..f3202f7 100644 --- a/src/pacman/util.c +++ b/src/pacman/util.c @@ -909,8 +909,14 @@ static void _display_targets(alpm_list_t *targets, int verbose) }

if(target->install) { - pm_asprintf(&str, "%s-%s", alpm_pkg_get_name(target->install), - alpm_pkg_get_version(target->install)); + if(!target->remove && config->op_s_upgrade) { + const colstr_t *colstr = &config->colstr; + pm_asprintf(&str, "%s%s-%s%s", colstr->title, alpm_pkg_get_name(target->install), + alpm_pkg_get_version(target->install), colstr->nocolor); + } else { + pm_asprintf(&str, "%s-%s", alpm_pkg_get_name(target->install), + alpm_pkg_get_version(target->install)); + } } else if(isize == 0) { pm_asprintf(&str, "%s-%s", alpm_pkg_get_name(target->remove), alpm_pkg_get_version(target->remove));