[pacman-dev] [PATCH v2] Give a "success!" message on database check
'pacman -Dk' prints a "success!" message if there were no errors.
It is possible to suppress the output using the '-q / --quiet' flag.
This implements the feature discussed at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50087
Signed-off-by: Patrick Eigensatz
On 08/10/16 05:45, Patrick Eigensatz wrote:
'pacman -Dk' prints a "success!" message if there were no errors. It is possible to suppress the output using the '-q / --quiet' flag.
This implements the feature discussed at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50087
Was there a difference between this patch and the one sent a week earlier? A
Yes, I was asked to add the -q / --quiet flag to the documentation
(manpage, --about output) as well. Patch v2 includes those changes.
Allan McRae
'pacman -Dk' prints a "success!" message if there were no errors.
It is possible to suppress the output using the '-q / --quiet' flag.
This implements the feature discussed at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50087
Was there a difference between this patch and the one sent a week earlier? A
On 10/10/16 00:53, Patrick Eigensatz wrote:
Yes, I was asked to add the -q / --quiet flag to the documentation (manpage, --about output) as well. Patch v2 includes those changes.
I was asking about the two different emails that were sent with "Patch v2". A
Ah yes there were 2 mails "patch v2", I forgot about the 1st one.
No, there are no differences but I used git's --in-reply-to flag and
changed the subject as well - therefore I wasn't sure whether the mail was
sent/and linked correctly and whether someone could read it because I
didn't receive an answer. (I'm not blaming anyone!)
Allan McRae
On 10/10/16 00:53, Patrick Eigensatz wrote:
Yes, I was asked to add the -q / --quiet flag to the documentation (manpage, --about output) as well. Patch v2 includes those changes.
I was asking about the two different emails that were sent with "Patch v2".
A
On 08/10/16 05:45, Patrick Eigensatz wrote:
'pacman -Dk' prints a "success!" message if there were no errors. It is possible to suppress the output using the '-q / --quiet' flag.
This implements the feature discussed at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50087
Signed-off-by: Patrick Eigensatz
---
OK - I changed the description of -q a bit to not just include database checks. I have committed a second patch to allow -q suppress success output of --asdeps and --asexplicit. A
I saw you updated the git repo, thank you :)
However looking again at it I noticed a mistake in the documentation:
+*-q, \--quiet*::
+ Apply to '-q' or '--quiet' to suppress messages on successful
+ completion of database operations.
It should obviously say:
"Apply to '-k' or --check'"
and not
"Apply to '-q' or '--quiet'"
I will write a patch for this as soon as possible.
Patrick
Allan McRae
'pacman -Dk' prints a "success!" message if there were no errors. It is possible to suppress the output using the '-q / --quiet' flag.
This implements the feature discussed at https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/50087
Signed-off-by: Patrick Eigensatz
---
OK - I changed the description of -q a bit to not just include database checks. I have committed a second patch to allow -q suppress success output of --asdeps and --asexplicit. A
On 09/12/16 03:52, Patrick Eigensatz wrote:
I saw you updated the git repo, thank you :)
However looking again at it I noticed a mistake in the documentation:
+*-q, \--quiet*::
+ Apply to '-q' or '--quiet' to suppress messages on successful + completion of database operations.
It should obviously say:
"Apply to '-k' or --check'"
and not
"Apply to '-q' or '--quiet'"
It should not even say that. It is a general flag for -D operations. Not need to provide a patch. A
participants (2)
-
Allan McRae
-
Patrick Eigensatz