[pacman-dev] Restore .pacsave file if present - WORK IN PROGRESS
Hi, In continuing to misjudge what would be an easy bug to fix I had an attempt at FS#8645 - Restore pacsaves on install [1]. The attached patch is a definite work in progress. I have two queries: 1) Would it be better to notify the user of the restore or to query them. Either way they will get a notification about the new file being installed to .pacsave. I'm leaning on query here because that would allow the user to stop really old files being restored. 2) Should I worry about the case where a file used to be backed up but is not now. This seems an edge case but would result in the file being restored then overwritten (I think.... I need to look at that further). Cheers, Allan [1] http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/8645
On Jan 13, 2008 6:48 AM, Allan McRae <allan.mcrae@qimr.edu.au> wrote:
Hi,
In continuing to misjudge what would be an easy bug to fix I had an attempt at FS#8645 - Restore pacsaves on install [1]. The attached patch is a definite work in progress.
I have two queries: 1) Would it be better to notify the user of the restore or to query them. Either way they will get a notification about the new file being installed to .pacsave. I'm leaning on query here because that would allow the user to stop really old files being restored.
2) Should I worry about the case where a file used to be backed up but is not now. This seems an edge case but would result in the file being restored then overwritten (I think.... I need to look at that further).
Hrm, what happens if, I install foo-1.0, uninstall it, then later reinstall foo-2.0 which has a totally different config format. We wouldn't be storing the OLD md5sum for the config file if a package is uninstalled. Perhaps we should actually ask the user, due to that case.
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Jan 13, 2008 6:48 AM, Allan McRae <allan.mcrae@qimr.edu.au> wrote:
Hi,
In continuing to misjudge what would be an easy bug to fix I had an attempt at FS#8645 - Restore pacsaves on install [1]. The attached patch is a definite work in progress.
I have two queries: 1) Would it be better to notify the user of the restore or to query them. Either way they will get a notification about the new file being installed to .pacsave. I'm leaning on query here because that would allow the user to stop really old files being restored.
2) Should I worry about the case where a file used to be backed up but is not now. This seems an edge case but would result in the file being restored then overwritten (I think.... I need to look at that further).
Hrm, what happens if, I install foo-1.0, uninstall it, then later reinstall foo-2.0 which has a totally different config format. We wouldn't be storing the OLD md5sum for the config file if a package is uninstalled.
Perhaps we should actually ask the user, due to that case.
Yes, thats what I was getting at in 1). For 2) I meant files that used to be in the backup array and no longer are were getting overwritten. Anyway, I have reworked this so that the user gets queried to restore a pacsave file and the file to be extracted now always gets saved as .pacnew. I will probably finish tiding this up at the weekend once I have tested it some more. Allan
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Allan McRae