[pacman-dev] [PATCH] logging fixes
http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/logging_fix.diff previous state: [12/19/05 21:55] removed mtr (0.69-2) [12/19/05 21:55] removed mtr (0.69-2) [12/19/05 10:29] upgraded dialog (1.0_20051207-1 -> (null)) [12/19/05 10:29] upgraded dialog ( -> 1.0_20051207-1) (previous version was 1.0_20051030-1) [12/19/05 21:55] installed mtr-nc (0.69-2) [12/19/05 21:55] installed mtr-nc (0.69-2) current state: [12/21/05 02:52] removed mtr (0.69-2) [12/21/05 02:45] upgraded postfix (2.2.7-1 -> 2.2.7-2) [12/21/05 02:53] installed mtr-nc (0.69-2) about why i removed the log calls from libalpm and not pacman: other places where there is only one log call (for example "synchronizing package lists") the call is from pacman udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org
VMiklos wrote:
http://frugalware.org/~vmiklos/patches/libpacman-proposed/logging_fix.diff
previous state: [12/19/05 21:55] removed mtr (0.69-2) [12/19/05 21:55] removed mtr (0.69-2)
[12/19/05 10:29] upgraded dialog (1.0_20051207-1 -> (null)) [12/19/05 10:29] upgraded dialog ( -> 1.0_20051207-1) (previous version was 1.0_20051030-1)
[12/19/05 21:55] installed mtr-nc (0.69-2) [12/19/05 21:55] installed mtr-nc (0.69-2)
current state: [12/21/05 02:52] removed mtr (0.69-2)
[12/21/05 02:45] upgraded postfix (2.2.7-1 -> 2.2.7-2)
[12/21/05 02:53] installed mtr-nc (0.69-2)
Applied.
about why i removed the log calls from libalpm and not pacman: other places where there is only one log call (for example "synchronizing package lists") the call is from pacman
I agree with you: let's give more control to the frontend to decide what should be logged or not. -- Aurelien
participants (2)
-
Aurelien Foret
-
VMiklos