Idézés Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>:

On Nov 23, 2007 3:57 PM, Nagy Gabor <ngaba@bibl.u-szeged.hu> wrote:

...

Patch attached.

Notes: 1. 'Compressed size' is ugly [too long, no space before :], improvements welcome 2. The following commit is misleading in case of sync packages (isize == 0 means isize is not filled in, not isize == csize): http://projects.archlinux.org/git/? p=pacman.git;a=commit;h=5e12d3dec99e7a506683cf625fa4344f57df0b77

This looks fine to me - Dan, opinions?

There is something I wasn't sure: is 'Packager: None' OK? (so 'None' for empty string, not 'Unknown' <- to follow list_display-style) Well, the 3 fields in the subject are not crucial at all, as I see: They are used with --info and in messages only. But the current implementation of them is quite chaotic. I would prefer use only csize and isize in the code and %CSIZE%, %ISIZE% in the db backends. The new pacman installscript will sed localdb to remove %REQUIREDBY%, so this is a good time to do s/%SIZE%/%ISIZE%/ too. Or maybe the problem is here: /* NOTE: the CSIZE and SIZE fields both share the "size" field ...*/ This is simply odd. We win sizeof(int) bytes for each packages (however, we use fixed-size strings) in pmpkg_t. I could accept this to simplify pkg_get_[i]size, but sharing ISIZE and SIZE would be much more plausible imho. Bye ---------------------------------------------------- SZTE Egyetemi Könyvtár - http://www.bibl.u-szeged.hu This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/