Re: [pacman-dev] New patchset for package signing
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <denisfalqueto@gmail.com> wrote:
Guys,
The previous patches were not much commented. I believe the main problem was the fact that I didn't use gpgme (and, instead, undone some work already done).
So, I changed the code to use gpgme. Here are the patches for your evaluation.
Hi, Now that ArchCon has ended, I believe we can continue with the discussion, right? The replies are rare, so I don't know if there is not enough interest or if my implementation is so bad that can't be fixed :) I am open to any constructive criticism and suggestions, as always. -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto -------------------------------------------
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <denisfalqueto@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Denis A. Altoé Falqueto <denisfalqueto@gmail.com> wrote:
Guys,
The previous patches were not much commented. I believe the main problem was the fact that I didn't use gpgme (and, instead, undone some work already done).
So, I changed the code to use gpgme. Here are the patches for your evaluation.
Hi,
Now that ArchCon has ended, I believe we can continue with the discussion, right? The replies are rare, so I don't know if there is not enough interest or if my implementation is so bad that can't be fixed :) I am open to any constructive criticism and suggestions, as always.
Wherever you are quoting the above message from, it never made it to my Inbox... What happened to your public repo as well? I think that is why you've heard nothing but silence. -Dan
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:02 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Wherever you are quoting the above message from, it never made it to my Inbox...
What happened to your public repo as well? I think that is why you've heard nothing but silence.
Duh, crap... I sent it just to me... I'll send it to pacman-dev now -- A: Because it obfuscates the reading. Q: Why is top posting so bad? ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto -------------------------------------------
participants (2)
-
Dan McGee
-
Denis A. Altoé Falqueto