[pacman-dev] pacman doesn't realize about letter package versioning when doing upgrades
Simply put: pacman -Syu <snip> warning: openssh: local (4.7p1-3) is newer than core (4.7p1-2) warning: openssl: local (0.9.8g-1) is newer than core (0.9.8f-1) <snip> :: openssh requires openssl>=0.9.8g :-) It simply does not realize that 0.9.8f-1 is newer than 0.9.8g-1. Cheers! //m. -- Mateusz Jędrasik <m.jedrasik@gmail.com> tel. +48(79)022-9393, +48(51)69-444-90 http://imachine.szklo.eu.org
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 10:00:20AM +0200, Mateusz Jedrasik wrote:
Simply put:
pacman -Syu <snip> warning: openssh: local (4.7p1-3) is newer than core (4.7p1-2) warning: openssl: local (0.9.8g-1) is newer than core (0.9.8f-1) <snip> :: openssh requires openssl>=0.9.8g
:-)
It simply does not realize that 0.9.8f-1 is newer than 0.9.8g-1.
f newer than g? What?
From openssl.org : 19-Oct-2007: OpenSSL 0.9.8g is now available, including bug fixes 11-Oct-2007: OpenSSL 0.9.8f is now available, including security and bug fixes
Anyway, what are you doing? Why do you have two locally installed packages from testing? And why are you doing a -Syu without testing enabled?
Saturday 27 of October 2007 11:52:39 Xavier napisał(a):
f newer than g? What?
Erh, typo sorry, Ofcourse I meant g newer than f. As I understand, it claims openssh requires openssl lesser than or equal to 0.9.8g ? Is that correct ? Because then my claim is off. But if it's the other way around, that is, if it requires openssl higher or equal to 0.9.8g, then having 0.9.8f installed, it should not complain. Unless I'm missing something ... Cheers! -- Mateusz Jędrasik <m.jedrasik@gmail.com> tel. +48(79)022-9393, +48(51)69-444-90 http://imachine.szklo.eu.org
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 01:44:05PM +0200, Mateusz Jedrasik wrote:
if it requires openssl higher or equal to 0.9.8g, then having 0.9.8f installed, it should not complain.
Sorry, but I still can't understand this. if it requires openssl higher or equal to 0.9.8g, then having 0.9.8f installed, which is lower than 0.9.8g, it should complain.
I'm bit confused. Please log here your answers to pacman's questions, too; and the whole pacman output. Bye, ngaba
Saturday 27 of October 2007 15:43:40 Nagy Gabor napisał(a):
I'm bit confused. Please log here your answers to pacman's questions, too; and the whole pacman output. Bye, ngaba
_______________________________________________ pacman-dev mailing list pacman-dev@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev
No, pacman is okay and behaves correctly. I'm just messed up. It seems that if there is not a package available in the repos, it does not work to update packages dependant on it.. or something along these lines. nevermind. I'm just being tired ;) CheerS! -- Mateusz Jędrasik <m.jedrasik@gmail.com> tel. +48(79)022-9393, +48(51)69-444-90 http://imachine.szklo.eu.org
participants (3)
-
Mateusz Jedrasik
-
Nagy Gabor
-
Xavier