2007/4/23, Dan McGee dpmcgee@gmail.com:

On 3/28/07, Roman Kyrylych roman.kyrylych@gmail.com wrote:

...

Hi!

I've upgraded to pacman3 and did this: [root@server ~]# pacman -Sc Do you want to remove old packages from cache? [Y/n] removing old packages from cache... done. [root@server ~]# pacman -Scc Do you want to remove all packages from cache? [Y/n] n

IMO -Scc default choice should be N, because it's easy to do -Scc instead of -Sc and hit Enter as usual.

Cleaning the email inbox. Submit a patch (against GIT) if you want this, and I'd like to see what a few other people think about it.

From 3775b9031181d72ab4c63b5cd166f6af3bf714c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Roman Kyrylych roman@archlinux.org Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:12:26 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] changed default -Scc answer to N

Signed-off-by: Roman Kyrylych roman@archlinux.org --- src/pacman/sync.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/pacman/sync.c b/src/pacman/sync.c index 7d7de52..9102a9a 100644 --- a/src/pacman/sync.c +++ b/src/pacman/sync.c @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static int sync_cleancache(int level) FREELIST(clean); } else { /* full cleanup */ - if(!yesno(_("Do you want to remove all packages from cache? [Y/n] "))) + if(yesno(_("Do you want to remove all packages from cache? [y/N] "))) return(0); printf(_("removing all packages from cache... "));