Re: [pacman-dev] pacman-dev Digest, Vol 18, Issue 26
stop sending me these emails
From: pacman-dev-request@archlinux.org Reply-To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Subject: pacman-dev Digest, Vol 18, Issue 26 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:09:54 -0500
Send pacman-dev mailing list submissions to pacman-dev@archlinux.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to pacman-dev-request@archlinux.org
You can reach the person managing the list at pacman-dev-owner@archlinux.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of pacman-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: pacman should ask the user on multipile choices (Aaron Griffin) 2. Re: pacman should ask the user on multipile choices (Roman Kyrylych) 3. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Alexander Fehr) 4. Thank you for new pacman. (Dawid Ci??arkiewicz) 5. Re: alpm_list: missing quick access to last element (J?rgen H?tzel) 6. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Pierre Schmitz) 7. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Alexander Fehr) 8. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Aaron Griffin) 9. CVS update of pacman-lib/src/pacman (pacman.c) (Aaron Griffin) 10. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Aaron Griffin) 11. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Travis Willard) 12. CVS update of pacman-lib/src/pacman (deptest.c) (Dan McGee) 13. 20070308 Pacman Italian patch (Giovanni Scafora)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:33:25 -0600 From: "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] pacman should ask the user on multipile choices To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <d64a48980703071133h4e11e067pa2d4c3d80afef2e9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Hi,
I am not sure if this is a bug or missing feature; so I sent this to the ml first.
Sometime a package depends on a "meta" package which is provided by more
On 3/7/07, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote: than
one packages. For example "libgl" or "smtp-server". At the moment pacman just installs the first package it founds which is the wrong decision for most cases.
Right, this is the current way pacman2 does it. It's harder to do and I think it's either in a TODO in the code, or on my TODO.aaron list. Not sure, but it's planned.
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:45:48 +0200 From: "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] pacman should ask the user on multipile choices To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <577f15290703071145r799e29fsd47994b8bf9ba16d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-5; format=flowed
On 3/7/07, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if this is a bug or missing feature; so I sent this to
first.
Sometime a package depends on a "meta" package which is provided by more than one packages. For example "libgl" or "smtp-server". At the moment
2007/3/7, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>: the ml pacman just
installs the first package it founds which is the wrong decision for most cases.
Right, this is the current way pacman2 does it. It's harder to do and I think it's either in a TODO in the code, or on my TODO.aaron list. Not sure, but it's planned.
Yep, I surely remember the discussion about this somewhere but neither Flyspray nor Gmail are able to find it... doh...
I guess with --noconfirm we'll get old behavour anyway. We might add some option for pacman.conf though, like "Alias web-server=lighttpd" but it will be useful only for first install, so I dunno if it worth it..
-- Roman Kyrylych (????? ???????)
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:02:39 +0100 From: Alexander Fehr <pizzapunk@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <20070307210239.f11ee28e.pizzapunk@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:20:20 -0500 "Dan McGee" <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone here have anything to say about pacman3? Maybe even a "great job guys, I've had no problems at all?" Even you list-lurkers out there, feel free to speak up. We'd really like to get all the input we can so we are not scared as hell when we push it to testing and current soon after.
It's working fine here. Two small things I have noticed:
$ pacman -V ... Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> ... -> 2006 should be changed to 2007
$ pacman -h ... pacman {-R --remove} [options] <package> pacman {-S --sync} [options] [package] ... -> inconsistent use of brackets around package
Alex
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:59:13 +0000 From: Dawid Ci??arkiewicz <dawid.ciezarkiewicz@asn.pl> Subject: [pacman-dev] Thank you for new pacman. To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <200703072059.14230.dawid.ciezarkiewicz@asn.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I've just subscribed so forgive me that I'm opening new thread.
New pacman is very fast and I haven't found single issue using it (and I'm pretty sure it will stay like this).
Please keep up your great work. Thank you. :)
------------------------------
Message: 5 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:05:56 +0100 From: J?rgen H?tzel <juergen@hoetzel.info> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] alpm_list: missing quick access to last element To: Discussion list for pacman development <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20070307200555.GA14681@h5331.serverkompetenz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:27PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On 3/5/07, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
whereas a typical implementation of the same thing (like ours) requires two.
requires THREE*
Well, this is because the list_header is embedded in the data structures. This requires us to change every pacman struct to include the list_header (if it used by the list functions). List callback function like alpm_list_fn_cmp will still require *void casting.
There are other areas where libpacman is quite inefficient (in respect of memory usage). Consider the fixed size preallocated strings in pmpkg_t (sizeof(pmpkg_t) == 1948). Memory footprint of pacman reading current/extra/community requires currently 10M (desc files on disc allocate 0.8M).
J?rgen
------------------------------
Message: 6 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:07:12 +0100 From: Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <200703072107.12557.pierre@archlinux.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2007 21:02:39 schrieb Alexander Fehr:
$ pacman -h ... pacman {-R --remove} ?[options] <package> pacman {-S --sync} ? ?[options] [package] ... -> inconsistent use of brackets around package
No, because [..] indicates that the parameter is optional.
------------------------------
Message: 7 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:17:19 +0100 From: Alexander Fehr <pizzapunk@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <20070307211719.a591ac13.pizzapunk@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:07:12 +0100 Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2007 21:02:39 schrieb Alexander Fehr:
$ pacman -h ... pacman {-R --remove} ?[options] <package> pacman {-S --sync} ? ?[options] [package] ... -> inconsistent use of brackets around package
No, because [..] indicates that the parameter is optional.
You are right. Next time I should thing more about it.
Alex
------------------------------
Message: 8 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:28:17 -0600 From: "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <d64a48980703071228l7adeedb9y2555231083933ca0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 3/6/07, Travis Willard <travisw@wmpub.ca> wrote:
$ makepkg -c ==> Entering fakeroot environment ==> Making package: audacious-plugins 1.3.0-1 (Tue Mar 6 21:52:22 EST 2007) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Missing Dependencies: -> audacious-player>=1.3.0 -> libmpcdec>=1.2.5 ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> ERROR: could not resolve all dependencies. -[travis@Cerebral]-[~/archlinux/extra/multimedia/audacious-plugins]- 09:52pm $ pacman -Q audacious-player audacious-player 1.3.0-1 -[travis@Cerebral]-[~/archlinux/extra/multimedia/audacious-plugins]- 09:52pm $ pacman -Q libmpcdec libmpcdec 1.2.5-1 -[travis@Cerebral]-[~/archlinux/extra/multimedia/audacious-plugins]- 09:52pm $ pacman -Q pacman pacman 3.0.0-1
I do indeed have the deps, as you can see.
This should be fixed in CVS. The deptesting wasn't splitting the comparators out, so "foo>=1.2" was taken literally. That is, you don't have a package named "foo>=1.2" installed. 8) Expect this fixed when the next push comes around.
------------------------------
Message: 9 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:29:29 -0500 From: Aaron Griffin <aaron@archlinux.org> Subject: [pacman-dev] CVS update of pacman-lib/src/pacman (pacman.c) To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <E1HP2lN-0004sP-2h@archlinux.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2007 @ 15:29:29 Author: aaron Path: /home/cvs-pacman/pacman-lib/src/pacman
Modified: pacman.c (1.104 -> 1.105)
* Updated -V output to include the 2007 copyright date.
----------+ pacman.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c diff -u pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c:1.104 pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c:1.105 --- pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c:1.104 Mon Mar 5 17:13:35 2007 +++ pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c Wed Mar 7 15:29:28 2007 @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ { printf("\n"); printf(" .--. Pacman v%s - libalpm v%s\n", PACKAGE_VERSION, LIB_VERSION); - printf("/ _.-' .-. .-. .-. Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org>\n"); + printf("/ _.-' .-. .-. .-. Copyright (C) 2002-2007 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org>\n"); printf("\\ '-. '-' '-' '-'\n"); printf(" '--' \n"); printf(_(" This program may be freely redistributed under\n"));
------------------------------
Message: 10 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:33:18 -0600 From: "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <d64a48980703071233p559953ffybd60ad35d72eae07@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 3/7/07, Alexander Fehr <pizzapunk@gmail.com> wrote:
It's working fine here. Two small things I have noticed:
$ pacman -V ... Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> ... -> 2006 should be changed to 2007
Fixed in CVS, thanks
------------------------------
Message: 11 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:48:37 -0500 From: Travis Willard <travisw@wmpub.ca> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <20070307154837.66276eb3@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:56:24 +0200 "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
P.S.: What about that dependency bug in makepkg reported by Travis?
Seems to be fixed in CVS. ;)
-- Travis
Unsubscribe then! You still want the game? Maybe you should do a bit more investigation befor sigining up. Haha. <http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/options/pacman-dev> -Dan On 3/8/07, Mark MacNeill <mkmacneill@hotmail.com> wrote:
stop sending me these emails
From: pacman-dev-request@archlinux.org Reply-To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Subject: pacman-dev Digest, Vol 18, Issue 26 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:09:54 -0500
Send pacman-dev mailing list submissions to pacman-dev@archlinux.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to pacman-dev-request@archlinux.org
You can reach the person managing the list at pacman-dev-owner@archlinux.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of pacman-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: pacman should ask the user on multipile choices (Aaron Griffin) 2. Re: pacman should ask the user on multipile choices (Roman Kyrylych) 3. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Alexander Fehr) 4. Thank you for new pacman. (Dawid Ci??arkiewicz) 5. Re: alpm_list: missing quick access to last element (J?rgen H?tzel) 6. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Pierre Schmitz) 7. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Alexander Fehr) 8. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Aaron Griffin) 9. CVS update of pacman-lib/src/pacman (pacman.c) (Aaron Griffin) 10. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Aaron Griffin) 11. Re: The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 (Travis Willard) 12. CVS update of pacman-lib/src/pacman (deptest.c) (Dan McGee) 13. 20070308 Pacman Italian patch (Giovanni Scafora)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:33:25 -0600 From: "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] pacman should ask the user on multipile choices To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <d64a48980703071133h4e11e067pa2d4c3d80afef2e9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Hi,
I am not sure if this is a bug or missing feature; so I sent this to the ml first.
Sometime a package depends on a "meta" package which is provided by more
On 3/7/07, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote: than
one packages. For example "libgl" or "smtp-server". At the moment pacman just installs the first package it founds which is the wrong decision for most cases.
Right, this is the current way pacman2 does it. It's harder to do and I think it's either in a TODO in the code, or on my TODO.aaron list. Not sure, but it's planned.
------------------------------
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:45:48 +0200 From: "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] pacman should ask the user on multipile choices To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <577f15290703071145r799e29fsd47994b8bf9ba16d@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-5; format=flowed
On 3/7/07, Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if this is a bug or missing feature; so I sent this to
first.
Sometime a package depends on a "meta" package which is provided by more than one packages. For example "libgl" or "smtp-server". At the moment
2007/3/7, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com>: the ml pacman just
installs the first package it founds which is the wrong decision for most cases.
Right, this is the current way pacman2 does it. It's harder to do and I think it's either in a TODO in the code, or on my TODO.aaron list. Not sure, but it's planned.
Yep, I surely remember the discussion about this somewhere but neither Flyspray nor Gmail are able to find it... doh...
I guess with --noconfirm we'll get old behavour anyway. We might add some option for pacman.conf though, like "Alias web-server=lighttpd" but it will be useful only for first install, so I dunno if it worth it..
-- Roman Kyrylych (????? ???????)
------------------------------
Message: 3 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:02:39 +0100 From: Alexander Fehr <pizzapunk@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <20070307210239.f11ee28e.pizzapunk@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 12:20:20 -0500 "Dan McGee" <dpmcgee@gmail.com> wrote:
Anyone here have anything to say about pacman3? Maybe even a "great job guys, I've had no problems at all?" Even you list-lurkers out there, feel free to speak up. We'd really like to get all the input we can so we are not scared as hell when we push it to testing and current soon after.
It's working fine here. Two small things I have noticed:
$ pacman -V ... Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> ... -> 2006 should be changed to 2007
$ pacman -h ... pacman {-R --remove} [options] <package> pacman {-S --sync} [options] [package] ... -> inconsistent use of brackets around package
Alex
------------------------------
Message: 4 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:59:13 +0000 From: Dawid Ci??arkiewicz <dawid.ciezarkiewicz@asn.pl> Subject: [pacman-dev] Thank you for new pacman. To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <200703072059.14230.dawid.ciezarkiewicz@asn.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I've just subscribed so forgive me that I'm opening new thread.
New pacman is very fast and I haven't found single issue using it (and I'm pretty sure it will stay like this).
Please keep up your great work. Thank you. :)
------------------------------
Message: 5 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:05:56 +0100 From: J?rgen H?tzel <juergen@hoetzel.info> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] alpm_list: missing quick access to last element To: Discussion list for pacman development <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <20070307200555.GA14681@h5331.serverkompetenz.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:27PM -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:
On 3/5/07, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
whereas a typical implementation of the same thing (like ours) requires two.
requires THREE*
Well, this is because the list_header is embedded in the data structures. This requires us to change every pacman struct to include the list_header (if it used by the list functions). List callback function like alpm_list_fn_cmp will still require *void casting.
There are other areas where libpacman is quite inefficient (in respect of memory usage). Consider the fixed size preallocated strings in pmpkg_t (sizeof(pmpkg_t) == 1948). Memory footprint of pacman reading current/extra/community requires currently 10M (desc files on disc allocate 0.8M).
J?rgen
------------------------------
Message: 6 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:07:12 +0100 From: Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <200703072107.12557.pierre@archlinux.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2007 21:02:39 schrieb Alexander Fehr:
$ pacman -h ... pacman {-R --remove} ?[options] <package> pacman {-S --sync} ? ?[options] [package] ... -> inconsistent use of brackets around package
No, because [..] indicates that the parameter is optional.
------------------------------
Message: 7 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:17:19 +0100 From: Alexander Fehr <pizzapunk@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <20070307211719.a591ac13.pizzapunk@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 21:07:12 +0100 Pierre Schmitz <pierre@archlinux.de> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 7. M?rz 2007 21:02:39 schrieb Alexander Fehr:
$ pacman -h ... pacman {-R --remove} ?[options] <package> pacman {-S --sync} ? ?[options] [package] ... -> inconsistent use of brackets around package
No, because [..] indicates that the parameter is optional.
You are right. Next time I should thing more about it.
Alex
------------------------------
Message: 8 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:28:17 -0600 From: "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <d64a48980703071228l7adeedb9y2555231083933ca0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 3/6/07, Travis Willard <travisw@wmpub.ca> wrote:
$ makepkg -c ==> Entering fakeroot environment ==> Making package: audacious-plugins 1.3.0-1 (Tue Mar 6 21:52:22 EST 2007) ==> Checking Runtime Dependencies...
==> Missing Dependencies: -> audacious-player>=1.3.0 -> libmpcdec>=1.2.5 ==> Checking Buildtime Dependencies... ==> ERROR: could not resolve all dependencies. -[travis@Cerebral]-[~/archlinux/extra/multimedia/audacious-plugins]- 09:52pm $ pacman -Q audacious-player audacious-player 1.3.0-1 -[travis@Cerebral]-[~/archlinux/extra/multimedia/audacious-plugins]- 09:52pm $ pacman -Q libmpcdec libmpcdec 1.2.5-1 -[travis@Cerebral]-[~/archlinux/extra/multimedia/audacious-plugins]- 09:52pm $ pacman -Q pacman pacman 3.0.0-1
I do indeed have the deps, as you can see.
This should be fixed in CVS. The deptesting wasn't splitting the comparators out, so "foo>=1.2" was taken literally. That is, you don't have a package named "foo>=1.2" installed. 8) Expect this fixed when the next push comes around.
------------------------------
Message: 9 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:29:29 -0500 From: Aaron Griffin <aaron@archlinux.org> Subject: [pacman-dev] CVS update of pacman-lib/src/pacman (pacman.c) To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <E1HP2lN-0004sP-2h@archlinux.org>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2007 @ 15:29:29 Author: aaron Path: /home/cvs-pacman/pacman-lib/src/pacman
Modified: pacman.c (1.104 -> 1.105)
* Updated -V output to include the 2007 copyright date.
----------+ pacman.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c diff -u pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c:1.104 pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c:1.105 --- pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c:1.104 Mon Mar 5 17:13:35 2007 +++ pacman-lib/src/pacman/pacman.c Wed Mar 7 15:29:28 2007 @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ { printf("\n"); printf(" .--. Pacman v%s - libalpm v%s\n", PACKAGE_VERSION, LIB_VERSION); - printf("/ _.-' .-. .-. .-. Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org>\n"); + printf("/ _.-' .-. .-. .-. Copyright (C) 2002-2007 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org>\n"); printf("\\ '-. '-' '-' '-'\n"); printf(" '--' \n"); printf(_(" This program may be freely redistributed under\n"));
------------------------------
Message: 10 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 14:33:18 -0600 From: "Aaron Griffin" <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: "Discussion list for pacman development" <pacman-dev@archlinux.org> Message-ID: <d64a48980703071233p559953ffybd60ad35d72eae07@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
On 3/7/07, Alexander Fehr <pizzapunk@gmail.com> wrote:
It's working fine here. Two small things I have noticed:
$ pacman -V ... Copyright (C) 2002-2006 Judd Vinet <jvinet@zeroflux.org> ... -> 2006 should be changed to 2007
Fixed in CVS, thanks
------------------------------
Message: 11 Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:48:37 -0500 From: Travis Willard <travisw@wmpub.ca> Subject: Re: [pacman-dev] The real deal - pacman 3.0.0 RC1 To: pacman-dev@archlinux.org Message-ID: <20070307154837.66276eb3@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 20:56:24 +0200 "Roman Kyrylych" <roman.kyrylych@gmail.com> wrote:
P.S.: What about that dependency bug in makepkg reported by Travis?
Seems to be fixed in CVS. ;)
-- Travis
On 3/8/07, Mark MacNeill <mkmacneill@hotmail.com> wrote:
stop sending me these emails
You are the one who subscribed to this mailing list. Follow the instructions at the top of the digest message. It actually says:
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/pacman-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to pacman-dev-request@archlinux.org
participants (3)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Dan McGee
-
Mark MacNeill