On less capable terminals, pacman should probably display only one active progress bar simultaneously.
An example of such a terminal is Emacs's M-x shell ($TERM == "dumb"). It can't display the additional "total" properly because it doesn't implement cursor movement.
On 29/6/21 7:23 pm, miha--- via pacman-dev wrote:
On less capable terminals, pacman should probably display only one active progress bar simultaneously.
An example of such a terminal is Emacs's M-x shell ($TERM == "dumb"). It can't display the additional "total" properly because it doesn't implement cursor movement.
For such terminals you can use "--noprogressbar", or set the equivalent in pacman.conf.
Allan
Allan McRae allan@archlinux.org writes:
On 29/6/21 7:23 pm, miha--- via pacman-dev wrote:
On less capable terminals, pacman should probably display only one active progress bar simultaneously.
An example of such a terminal is Emacs's M-x shell ($TERM == "dumb"). It can't display the additional "total" properly because it doesn't implement cursor movement.
For such terminals you can use "--noprogressbar", or set the equivalent in pacman.conf.
Allan
Thanks.
pacman-dev@lists.archlinux.org