Search results for "wechat" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#70148] Deletion Request for electronic-wechat-uos-bin Rejected

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Request #70148 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: I'm sorry but I don't want another flame of hell by handling wechat packages, people goes crazy when wechat is touched [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

10 months

[PRQ#70136] Deletion Request for wechat-devtools Rejected

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Request #70136 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: I'm sorry but I don't want another flame of hell by handling wechat packages, people goes crazy when wechat is touched [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

10 months

[PRQ#72105] Orphan Request for wechat-devtools-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for wechat-devtools-bin [2]: Flagged out-of-date (2025-02-18). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-devtools-bin/

8 months, 1 week

[PRQ#75734] Deletion Request for wechat-bwrap

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

oech3 [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-bwrap [2]: Migration package. No longer useful. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/oech3/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-bwrap/

3 months, 3 weeks

[PRQ#75912] Deletion Request for wechat-universal-bwrap

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

oech3 [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-universal-bwrap [2]: Sandbox config should be part of wiki instead of package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/oech3/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-universal-bwrap/

3 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PRQ#68160] Deletion Request for wechat

by Marcell Meszaros

On 30 December 2024 08:03:28 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >maoyaotang1 [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: > >更新源乱七八糟的搞 > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/maoyaotang1/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/ The deletion request facility is not the comment section, and not a private grievance outlet. Please submit a constructive and well-reasoned feedback as a comment on the AURweb page of this package.

11 months, 3 weeks

Re: [PRQ#68175] Orphan Request for wechat

by Marcell Meszaros

On 30 December 2024 15:03:47 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >crab2313 [1] filed an orphan request for wechat [2]: > >The maintainer is a shit hole by spamming the entire community. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/crab2313/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/ Personal attacks, inflammatory and hostile ad hominem behavior against anyone are disallowed by the Arch Linux Code of Conduct. [1] [1]: https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct

11 months, 3 weeks

[PRQ#60684] Deletion Request for wechat-arch-linux Accepted

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Request #60684 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: Indeed, really low quality package with questionable things (like git cloning a 3rd party repo in the package() function to install stuff from it in $pkgdir, questionable actions ran in the .install script, etc...). @linzeen Please, take a look at https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD & https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines For what it's worth, methods to install wechat on Arch Linux are already documented in https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WeChat [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

1 year, 6 months

Re: [PRQ#60974] Deletion Request for wechat-uos-bwrap

by Kimiblock Moe

Hi, We already discussed the duplication in aur-general and Qt is its main GUI toolkit, please keep discussing there to avoid fragmentation issues. I suppose you know the AUR submission guidelines: "If it is currently maintained, changes can be submitted in a comment for the maintainer's attention" and "Do not create duplicate packages". While other WeChat QT packages exist, those maintainers' mistake is not your excuse of violating the submission rule. Again, I already explained why wechat-universal-bwrap is duplicated package in the mailing list, and you didn't give a response. You, and your package, duplicated wechat-uos-bwrap, and now want to wipe the slate clean? I question the rationale behind this and am genuinely upset about your actions: denying the facts and confusing others. As AUR packagers, we shall maintain a clean and friendly packaging environment, a space where guidelines are not dismissed. This incident is happening way to long and needs an end. -- Sincerely, Kimiblock

1 year, 6 months

[aur-requests] 回复：[PRQ#12216] Merge Request for deepin.com.wechat

by Eli Schwartz

On 08/04/2018 10:48 PM, skywol via aur-requests wrote: > > I didn't obhan my package why do you want to merge my packages？ And you > want depend “deepin-wine" which maintained by me，I plant the > "deepin-wine" from deepin to arch ,you just used it and merge my package > ,don't you think is it a joke ? I have no idea what the "joke" here is supposed to be, but we don't need multiple packages for the same thing, and this package was a duplicate of deepin-wechat, which was uploaded *after* deepin-wechat. Maintaining one of the dependencies does *not* give you the right to upload duplicates of someone else's package. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

7 years, 4 months

Aur-requests search results for query "wechat"