Search results for "wechat" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#39384] Merge Request for electronic-wechat-uos-electron

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Kimiblock [1] filed a request to merge electronic-wechat-uos-electron [2] into electronic-wechat-uos-bin [3]: The only difference is `electronic-wechat-uos-electron` uses a png icon from the package while `electronic-wechat-uos-bin` uses a SVG icon from WhiteSur [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kimiblock/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/electronic-wechat-uos-electron/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/electronic-wechat-uos-bin/

2 years, 8 months

[PRQ#67119] Deletion Request for wechat-universal-appimage

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-universal-appimage [2]: Broken, see @gnomewaylandibus' comment from 2024-11-06 14:53 (CET). Also upstream's name is not wechat-universal, it's either wechat or wechatlinux. Properly named package exists on AUR: wechat (upstream is closed source). [a] [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-universal-appimage/

8 months, 3 weeks

Re: About the intentionally duplicated package wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal and unmaintained orginal package wechat-uos

by Kimiblock Moe

Hi leaeasy, wechat-uos-bwrap is now renamed wechat-uos-qt to reflect the main toolkit. It does include SystemCallFilters and other sandbox features. However, these can be disabled within 2 clicks: Right Click then choose Disable sandbox, or write a specific environment variable to make permanent changes. I understand the fact that this thread is now wayyy too long for someone to read, but if you did, you'll find out we already discussed the non Arch detection logic above. Furthermore, these sandbox functions are not in PKGBUILD, they live in the launch script. Packaging is not easy, and I know 7Ji has made many improvements to the early wechat-uos-bwrap package and its scripts. However, this will not change the fact that wechat-beta-bwrap and wechat-universal-bwrap are 2 duplicated package of wechat-uos-qt, which is both fully functional and safer due to the restriction applied. -- Sincerely, Kimiblock

1 year, 2 months

回复: [PRQ#67119] Deletion Request for wechat-universal-appimage

by 1426669661

@marsseed fuck you do not judge my package ,nerver,---------- 回复的原邮件 ---------- 发件人：notify <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> 日期：2024年12月6日 20:59 主题：[PRQ#67119] Deletion Request for wechat-universal-appimage 收件人：aur-requests <aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org> 抄送："marcell.meszaros" <marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-universal-appimage [2]: Broken, see @gnomewaylandibus' comment from 2024-11-06 14:53 (CET). Also upstream's name is not wechat-universal, it's either wechat or wechatlinux. Properly named package exists on AUR: wechat (upstream is closed source). [a] [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-universal-appimage/

8 months, 3 weeks

[PRQ#57379] Merge Request for wechat-beta-bwrap

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Kimiblock [1] filed a request to merge wechat-beta-bwrap [2] into wechat-uos-bwrap [3]: This package is basically wechat-uos-bwrap, with no sandboxing which means this proprietary app can obtain any system data or user data The reason why wechat-uos-bwrap doesn’t come with beta in name is the fact that the app doesn’t recognize itself as a beta [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kimiblock/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-beta-bwrap/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-uos-bwrap/

1 year, 5 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#12216] Merge Request for deepin.com.wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

xtrm0 [1] filed a request to merge deepin.com.wechat [2] into deepin- wechat [3]: This package is a duplicate of deepin-wechat [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xtrm0/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/deepin.com.wechat/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/deepin-wechat/

7 years

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14288] Merge Request for wechat-web-devtools-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

ccat3z [1] filed a request to merge wechat-web-devtools-git [2] into wechat-devtools [3]: wechat-web-devtools-git is orphan and they are same package [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ccat3z/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-web-devtools-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-devtools/

6 years, 5 months

[PRQ#63705] Merge Request for wechat-beta-bwrap

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Lck0427 [1] filed a request to merge wechat-beta-bwrap [2] into wechat-universal-bwrap [3]: According to the maintainer, this package is now replaced by 'wechat- universal-bwrap'. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Lck0427/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-beta-bwrap/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-universal-bwrap/

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#65631] Merge Request for wechat-uos-bwrap

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Kimiblock [1] filed a request to merge wechat-uos-bwrap [2] into wechat [3]: This package has no real content. All files had been merged into aur/wechat [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kimiblock/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-uos-bwrap/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

9 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#67122] Merge Request for wechat-devtools-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge wechat-devtools-bin [2] into wechat-devtools [3]: Please kindly adopt and update 'wechat-devtools' instead of the duplicate '-bin' package. Upstream is closed source, so the '-bin' pkgname suffix is redundant. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-devtools-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-devtools/

8 months, 3 weeks

Aur-requests search results for query "wechat"