Search results for "wechat" - Aur-requests

Re: [PRQ#68156] Deletion Request for wechat

by Marcell Meszaros

On 30 December 2024 04:35:52 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >unn [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: > >The maintainer of this AUR package treats its users as a testing >ground, with multiple inappropriate submissions in between. >Furthermore, they forcibly merged another simple and reliable AUR >package, wechat-bin. Due to distrust in this maintainer and >considering the large user base of the wechat package, I do not >believe this maintainer is capable of maintaining wechat. Therefore, I >request its deletion. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/unn/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/ The deletion request facility is not the comment section, and not a private grievance outlet. Please submit a constructive and well-reasoned feedback as a comment on the AURweb page of this package. This package is named well in accordance of all AUR guidelines, whereas 'wechat-bin' is not. Upstream is closed-source, so the package should be named 'wechat'. The maintainer of AUR/wechat is actually responsive to user feedback, and has taken many steps so far to address previous objections, e.g. about the former practice of forcing this to use bubblewrap sandbox. Now that is made optional, so users can choose whether to use it with or without bwrap. Please read the AUR submission guidelines [1] and the Nonfree applications package guidelines [2] to understand the expected packaging practices, to which AUR/wechat seems to conform to appropriately. [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines [2]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Nonfree_applications_package_guidelines

1 month

[PRQ#68163] Deletion Request for wechat-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-bin [2]: Duplicate of AUR/wechat. Upstream is closed-source. Please kindly familiarize yourself with the relevant Arch/AUR guidelines [a][b], to which AUR/wechat conforms to, whereas a package named 'wechat-bin' does not. And please refrain from creating duplicates on AUR. Instead, send your feedback and/or offer your help or a patch to the maintainers of the already existing package, especially if that package is the canonical one, approved by AUR Package Maintainers / Arch Developers ("admin" users). [a]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines [b]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Nonfree_applications_package_guidelines [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-bin/

1 month

[PRQ#65724] Deletion Request for wechat-devtool

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Kandscode [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-devtool [2]: This pack hasn't been updated in a long time and lacks maintenance. And depending on the votes and comments, there may be very few people still using this package, and there is a much better alternative to this package, like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wechat-devtools- bin and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wechat-devtools-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kandscode/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-devtool/

2 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#68192] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Cinnamon [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Cinnamon/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

1 month

[PRQ#68193] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

davy0710 [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/davy0710/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

1 month

[PRQ#68194] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Xfce [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Xfce/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

1 month

[PRQ#68195] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

i3WM [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/i3WM/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

1 month

[PRQ#68196] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Hyprland [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Hyprland/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

1 month

Re: [PRQ#68159] Deletion Request for wechat

by Marcell Meszaros

On 30 December 2024 07:18:09 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >crab2313 [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: > >Why you merge wechat-bin into this shit ? I believe you are violating >the EULA of UOS app store. Delete this package immediately or you will >have legal issue. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/crab2313/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/ The deletion request facility is not the comment section, and not a private grievance outlet. Please submit a constructive and well-reasoned feedback as a comment on the AURweb page of this package. I do not think this PKGBUILD (installer recipe) violates any EULA. Vague opinions are not legal arguments. This package is named well in accordance of all AUR guidelines, whereas 'wechat-bin' is not. Upstream is closed-source, so the package should be named 'wechat'. Also, the maintainer of AUR/wechat is actually responsive to user feedback, and has taken steps to address previous objections of forcing this to use bubblewrap sandbox. Now that is made optional, so users can choose whether to use it with or without bwrap.

1 month

Re: [PRQ#57991] Merge Request for wechat-universal-bwrap

by Kimiblock Moe

Hi all, As explained in aur-general[a][b], wechat-universal-bwrap is indeed a duplicate package of wechat-uos-bwrap. And should be merged due to the confusion[c] caused by it. As a side note, the original package was renamed to `wechat-uos-qt`, which now provides & replaces wechat-universal-bwrap. Looking forward to PMs' action, as the confusion is growing in the community... [a]: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-general@lists.archlinux.org/m… [b]: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-general@lists.archlinux.org/m… [c]: https://matrix.to/#/!EOKdtPPIPRxceuxXvC:mozilla.org/$2DhVI9uj46XipRaQ5cdu0e… Sincerely, Kimiblock

10 months, 1 week

Aur-requests search results for query "wechat"