Search results for "wechat" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#68166] Deletion Request for pidgin-wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for pidgin-wechat [2]: Long dead + EOL + abandoned package (last updated in from 2021). Was reported as failing to build in that year. Upstream is unmaintained since 2019. [a] Last release was made in 2017. [b] [a]: https://github.com/sbwtw/pidgin-wechat [b]: https://github.com/sbwtw/pidgin-wechat/tags [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pidgin-wechat/

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#68185] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

unn [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: we don't want to remove this package, he can do whatever he want to pack what ever he likes, we just want a place to host our wechat-bin package, duplication is a reason that we refuse to accept to merge wechat-bin into this package. You can rename whatever you like of our wechat-bin, we can't accept this package as the only aur package of wechat. If this is the culture or some of the EULA rules, then I would say it's toxic. The behavior of the K user just made the aur his b****. If the merge of wechat-bin is the final desicion of the aur maintainers, I will quit and stop using arch linux. I'm sure you guys don't lack one user of this beloved distribution. The whole thing is an absolute farce, and what's even more unbearable is that the AUR administrators actually condone such behavior. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/unn/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

11 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PRQ#68156] Deletion Request for wechat

by Marcell Meszaros

On 30 December 2024 04:35:52 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >unn [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: > >The maintainer of this AUR package treats its users as a testing >ground, with multiple inappropriate submissions in between. >Furthermore, they forcibly merged another simple and reliable AUR >package, wechat-bin. Due to distrust in this maintainer and >considering the large user base of the wechat package, I do not >believe this maintainer is capable of maintaining wechat. Therefore, I >request its deletion. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/unn/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/ The deletion request facility is not the comment section, and not a private grievance outlet. Please submit a constructive and well-reasoned feedback as a comment on the AURweb page of this package. This package is named well in accordance of all AUR guidelines, whereas 'wechat-bin' is not. Upstream is closed-source, so the package should be named 'wechat'. The maintainer of AUR/wechat is actually responsive to user feedback, and has taken many steps so far to address previous objections, e.g. about the former practice of forcing this to use bubblewrap sandbox. Now that is made optional, so users can choose whether to use it with or without bwrap. Please read the AUR submission guidelines [1] and the Nonfree applications package guidelines [2] to understand the expected packaging practices, to which AUR/wechat seems to conform to appropriately. [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines [2]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Nonfree_applications_package_guidelines

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#68163] Deletion Request for wechat-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-bin [2]: Duplicate of AUR/wechat. Upstream is closed-source. Please kindly familiarize yourself with the relevant Arch/AUR guidelines [a][b], to which AUR/wechat conforms to, whereas a package named 'wechat-bin' does not. And please refrain from creating duplicates on AUR. Instead, send your feedback and/or offer your help or a patch to the maintainers of the already existing package, especially if that package is the canonical one, approved by AUR Package Maintainers / Arch Developers ("admin" users). [a]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines [b]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Nonfree_applications_package_guidelines [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-bin/

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#65724] Deletion Request for wechat-devtool

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Kandscode [1] filed a deletion request for wechat-devtool [2]: This pack hasn't been updated in a long time and lacks maintenance. And depending on the votes and comments, there may be very few people still using this package, and there is a much better alternative to this package, like https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wechat-devtools- bin and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wechat-devtools-git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kandscode/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-devtool/

1 year, 1 month

[PRQ#68192] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Cinnamon [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Cinnamon/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#68193] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

davy0710 [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/davy0710/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#68194] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Xfce [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Xfce/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#68195] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

i3WM [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/i3WM/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

11 months, 2 weeks

[PRQ#68196] Deletion Request for wechat

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Hyprland [1] filed a deletion request for wechat [2]: The package submitter is monopolizing the AUR community by taking advantage of name uniqueness, and has added over 40 unnecessary dependencies to the official WeChat package, force using bwrap for a long time! Moreover, it only supports KDE, and ignores bug reports from other environments, forcibly occupying the WeChat aur and deleting other contributors' official and clean packages!‌ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Hyprland/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat/

11 months, 2 weeks

Aur-requests search results for query "wechat"