Am Sonntag 03 Mai 2009 schrieb Andreas Radke:
Am Fri, 3 Apr 2009 07:59:37 +0200 (CEST)
schrieb Andreas Radke <a.radke@arcor.de>:
http://www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/03/31/on-the-tomtom- settlement-microsoft-rolls-back-its-%E2%80%9Copen%E2%80%9D-promises/
I haven't done further investigations but it seems we should take care about keep supporting the FAT file system.
How is the state with NTFS? Is the license situation there more safe?
Opinions?
-Andy
Kernel developers are working on it:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/31491/
We might think to use this option in our next kernel packages.
-Andy really, why to restrict vfat that way? Think of usbsticks with fat format, thats horrible imho.
greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org tpowa@archlinux.org