[arch-dev-public] Gimp-2.4 beta to current?
Hi, I like to bring gimp-2.4 (rc1) to current. the 2.3.x is fairly stable for a while and I actually use it exclusively. Any objections? -T
On 8/17/07, Tobias Kieslich <tobias@justdreams.de> wrote:
Hi,
I like to bring gimp-2.4 (rc1) to current. the 2.3.x is fairly stable for a while and I actually use it exclusively. Any objections?
Any reason it can't go in unstable or testing? No need to bump out the stable 2.2.X release... -Dan
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
On 8/17/07, Tobias Kieslich <tobias@justdreams.de> wrote:
Hi,
I like to bring gimp-2.4 (rc1) to current. the 2.3.x is fairly stable for a while and I actually use it exclusively. Any objections?
Any reason it can't go in unstable or testing? No need to bump out the stable 2.2.X release...
-Dan
Agree, we could update the gimp-devel package in unstable to 2.4rc1. That way, users will have the choice between the stable 2.2 in current or the 2.4rc in unstable. Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
On 8/17/07, Tobias Kieslich <tobias@justdreams.de> wrote:
Hi,
I like to bring gimp-2.4 (rc1) to current. the 2.3.x is fairly stable for a while and I actually use it exclusively. Any objections?
Any reason it can't go in unstable or testing? No need to bump out the stable 2.2.X release...
-Dan
Agree, we could update the gimp-devel package in unstable to 2.4rc1. That way, users will have the choice between the stable 2.2 in current or the 2.4rc in unstable.
We used to have the gimp devel styuff in current once it reached some mature state before. But it's fine we can also leave it. Was just an idea. So someone wanna update unstable? -T
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Eric Belanger wrote:
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
On 8/17/07, Tobias Kieslich <tobias@justdreams.de> wrote:
Hi,
I like to bring gimp-2.4 (rc1) to current. the 2.3.x is fairly stable for a while and I actually use it exclusively. Any objections?
Any reason it can't go in unstable or testing? No need to bump out the stable 2.2.X release...
-Dan
Agree, we could update the gimp-devel package in unstable to 2.4rc1. That way, users will have the choice between the stable 2.2 in current or the 2.4rc in unstable.
We used to have the gimp devel styuff in current once it reached some mature state before. But it's fine we can also leave it. Was just an idea. So someone wanna update unstable?
-T
I just updated gimp-devel to 2.4rc1. Eric -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 11:49 -0700, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
Hi,
I like to bring gimp-2.4 (rc1) to current. the 2.3.x is fairly stable for a while and I actually use it exclusively. Any objections?
-T
Unstable if you think the release will wait for a long while Testing if you think this is one of the last RCs before final will arrive.
participants (4)
-
Dan McGee
-
Eric Belanger
-
Jan de Groot
-
Tobias Kieslich