[arch-dev-public] [signoff] shadow 4.1.2.1-2
I made some minor changes to shadow, and renamed some files in addition to the version bump. This one now has libshadow.so again. Whoopsie. Please test, and criticize. If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be appreciated too. Thanks, Aaron :wq
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 07:37:57 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be appreciated too.
done -- Pierre Schmitz Clemens-August-Straße 76 53115 Bonn Telefon 0228 9716608 Mobil 0160 95269831 Jabber pierre@jabber.archlinux.de WWW http://www.archlinux.de
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 07:37:57 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be appreciated too.
done
I haven't noticed any problems on daily usage. I can still login. Signoff both arches. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 07:37:57 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be appreciated too.
done
I haven't noticed any problems on daily usage. I can still login. Signoff both arches.
Wow this is old. One thing I noticed... is that it seems to be doing that stupid debian thing where it creates new groups for new users too. I hate that. Can anyone confirm?
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 07:37:57 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be appreciated too.
done
I haven't noticed any problems on daily usage. I can still login. Signoff both arches.
Wow this is old.
One thing I noticed... is that it seems to be doing that stupid debian thing where it creates new groups for new users too. I hate that. Can anyone confirm?
Aha. Xavier contacted me over jabber and I think we fleshed this out. I'm fairly certain I've always used adduser in the past (the interactive script) which passes the -g argument to useradd, thus defaulting to the users group. useradd has apparently always worked this way. Problem solved (or rather, it never existed. I just tested the wrong utility)
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 07:37:57 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be appreciated too.
done
I haven't noticed any problems on daily usage. I can still login. Signoff both arches.
One more signoff for x86_64 please. This has been in testing for ages.
Aaron Griffin wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2008, Pierre Schmitz wrote:
Am Sonntag 31 August 2008 07:37:57 schrieb Aaron Griffin:
If someone can build for x86_64, that'd be appreciated too.
done
I haven't noticed any problems on daily usage. I can still login. Signoff both arches.
One more signoff for x86_64 please. This has been in testing for ages.
I'll add a signoff, both arches. Allan
participants (4)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Allan McRae
-
Eric Belanger
-
Pierre Schmitz