On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 11:43, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 at 18:47, Giancarlo Razzolini <grazzolini@archlinux.org> wrote:
Em dezembro 7, 2020 14:24 Emil Velikov escreveu:
Doing GL (primus+bumblebee) as a start, trimmed only to the bare minimum changes: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68882 https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/68883
Thanks.
Do you have details or a bug report about these? I haven't used intel gvt-g and on the occasion of skimming through the code - quality was below i915.
There is a nasty bug where nvidia prime render offload causes the VM to simply segfault [0]. But intel gvt-g is better than using virgl for 3D stuff on a VM.
If I have to choose - segfault or slower rendering (via virgl) - I'd choose the latter :-P Nevertheless added a few comments which should help you move forward.
I would suggest opting for virgl, until all the relevant bugs are fixed. This way we can proceed with the package cleanup quicker.
Is there any interest in the bugs opened, or the gvt regression is a must for those to move forward? My systems lack gvt support (nor do I have Windows license) to reproduce the bug(s), yet I'm willing to help to get this moving. Thanks Emil