LW, nope, there only is a 32-bit version available (which works fine on 64-bit). This isn't really a binary, but it contains CUPS executable filters. Should I still tag it as -bin? I have checked the other printer drivers and they don't use this naming scheme. Peter On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Peter Tobler <peter@tobler.cc> wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply, here the amended version (including systemd restart of the cups service):
PKGBUILD: http://pastie.org/pastes/10653442/text?key=pfryf0g6mecwu5nyd64a install: http://pastie.org/private/coqawo5r7xaiviekh39iq
Am I ready to go?
On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@archlinux.info> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:13:39 +0100 Peter Tobler <peter@tobler.cc> wrote:
Hi all, and happy holidays,
I am about to upload the PKGBUILD for the Dell 2155cn/cdn printer driver and thought someone should take a look at it before I submit. Please let me know if you spot any mistakes or find there are improvements that should be made.
Here is the mentioned PKGBUILD: http://pastie.org/pastes/10652982/text?key=23xhgip17gp9tvriuiyma
Kind regards, Peter
There's no reason to use the conditionals with the depends array anymore, pacman supports architecture specific arrays now (depends_i686, etc).
bsdtar will extract rpm files, no reason to pull in rpmextract.
Make sure you quote any paths that include any variables that you don't control, like ${pkgdir} and ${srcdir}.