Re: [aur-general] Proposed rules for packages entering [community]
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:54:20PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 22:27, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the TU meetings it was decided to post the proposal for restricting packages entering [community] here for discussion before voting.
My primary issue with the current proposal is that I feel 10 votes is slightly high for a first step. I'd *much* rather see 3-5 as a minimum, and I think others would as well.
89/97 packages with 0% usage on package stats have 5 votes or less. So this would achieve a net result of nothing.
How does that achieve a net result of nothing? If these rules were already in place it could have meant a net result of more than 500 less packages in community that we need to deal with.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 11:54:20PM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
Daenyth Blank wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 22:27, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the TU meetings it was decided to post the proposal for restricting packages entering [community] here for discussion before voting.
My primary issue with the current proposal is that I feel 10 votes is slightly high for a first step. I'd *much* rather see 3-5 as a minimum, and I think others would as well.
89/97 packages with 0% usage on package stats have 5 votes or less. So this would achieve a net result of nothing.
How does that achieve a net result of nothing? If these rules were already in place it could have meant a net result of more than 500 less packages in community that we need to deal with.
He's saying that lowering the voting requirements to 5 votes will give us nothing because there are a lot of crap/unused packages with 5 votes.
participants (2)
-
Aaron Griffin
-
Loui Chang