[aur-general] Duplicate package (emesene-bzr)
Found another one. emesene-bzr duplicates emesene-svn. Sources are different, but one is just a mirror of another. svn is the main developement source and launchpad mirrors it, so maybe remove one of them to avoid confusion. I would remove bzr, because it has much less votes and PKGBUILD of svn is much newer and better. emesene-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7930 emesene-bzr: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28049 Regards, Rene
2010/1/6 Rene Pärts <rene87@hot.ee>:
Found another one.
emesene-bzr duplicates emesene-svn. Sources are different, but one is just a mirror of another. svn is the main developement source and launchpad mirrors it, so maybe remove one of them to avoid confusion. I would remove bzr, because it has much less votes and PKGBUILD of svn is much newer and better.
emesene-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7930 emesene-bzr: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28049
From one of the posts here: http://emesene-msn.blogspot.com/
"well, it's not on svn like emesene 1.x, since the start of emesene 2 we are using git and the code is located at github." And the bzr is probably just because it's in launchpad as well..which sort of happens with some software. We can't really tell if it's an exact mirror or whether it can be ahead of the official one. Confirm that first and then we can delete it. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
Indeed, emesene 2 (emesene2-git in aur) is developed in git, but 1.x is still in svn and all commits are done in svn. Svn will also be history once 2.0 is released. http://emesene-msn.blogspot.com/2009/01/how-to-test-development-versions-of.... I've been with this project before 1.0 (first official release) and know it for sure. Rene 2010/1/5 Ray Rashif <schivmeister@gmail.com>
2010/1/6 Rene Pärts <rene87@hot.ee>:
Found another one.
emesene-bzr duplicates emesene-svn. Sources are different, but one is just a mirror of another. svn is the main developement source and launchpad mirrors it, so maybe remove one of them to avoid confusion. I would remove bzr, because it has much less votes and PKGBUILD of svn is much newer and better.
emesene-svn: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7930 emesene-bzr: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=28049
From one of the posts here: http://emesene-msn.blogspot.com/
"well, it's not on svn like emesene 1.x, since the start of emesene 2 we are using git and the code is located at github."
And the bzr is probably just because it's in launchpad as well..which sort of happens with some software.
We can't really tell if it's an exact mirror or whether it can be ahead of the official one. Confirm that first and then we can delete it.
-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
2010/1/6 Rene Pärts <rene87@hot.ee>:
Indeed, emesene 2 (emesene2-git in aur) is developed in git, but 1.x is still in svn and all commits are done in svn. Svn will also be history once 2.0 is released.
http://emesene-msn.blogspot.com/2009/01/how-to-test-development-versions-of....
I've been with this project before 1.0 (first official release) and know it for sure.
Removed. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD
participants (2)
-
Ray Rashif
-
Rene Pärts