October 2014 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#982] Deletion Request for cinnamon-menus-dev
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

realex [1] filed a deletion request for cinnamon-menus-dev [2]: substitution of "cinnamon-menus-git" [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/realex/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cinnamon-menus-dev/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#984] Orphan Request for nemo-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

realex [1] filed a orphan request for nemo-git [2]: Maintainer does not update pkgbuild, this package is an important. cinnamon-git depends on this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/realex/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nemo-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#985] Orphan Request for nemo-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Oct '14

02 Oct '14

realex [1] filed a orphan request for nemo-git [2]: Maintainer does not update pkgbuild, this package is an important. cinnamon-git depends on this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/realex/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nemo-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#972] Merge Request for pyglet-hg
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

daniel_shub [1] filed a request to merge pyglet-hg [2] into python-pyglet-hg [3]: The two packages are essentially the same, with python-pyglet-hg having been updated more recently and using directories in the PKGBUILD in a more traditional way. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/daniel_shub/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pyglet-hg/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pyglet-hg/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#976] Merge Request for webilder-gnome
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

TrialnError [1] filed a request to merge webilder-gnome [2] into webilder-gtk-patched [3]: Three PKGBuilds for the same Application https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webilder-gnome/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webilder-applet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webilder-gtk-patched/ Why should it be merged into the patched version? First it's maintained and working. The others are orphaned and out of date. Also the creator just provides a deb version for the newest version. Getting the source is a master-snapshot (which is webilder-gtk-patched doing) Second: The most appropiate name. It's a gtk application. Third: If someone want to use a non patched version he still should use the webilder-gtk-patched PKGBuild as a draft. And webilder/webilder-gtk would be a more fitting name than adding prefixes like -applet or -gnome [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/webilder-gnome/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/webilder-gtk-patched/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#977] Merge Request for webilder-applet
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

TrialnError [1] filed a request to merge webilder-applet [2] into webilder-gtk-patched [3]: Three PKGBuilds for the same Application https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webilder-gnome/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webilder-applet/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/webilder-gtk-patched/ Why should it be merged into the patched version? First it's maintained and working. The others are orphaned and out of date. Also the creator just provides a deb version for the newest version. Getting the source is a master-snapshot (which is webilder-gtk-patched doing) Secondly the most appropiate name. Mainly it's a gtk application. Third: If someone want to use a non patched version he still should use the webilder-gtk-patched PKGBuild as a draft. And webilder/webilder-gtk would be a more fitting name than adding prefixes like -applet or -gnome [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/webilder-applet/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/webilder-gtk-patched/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#975] Merge Request for vrok
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

TrialnError [1] filed a request to merge vrok [2] into vrok-git [3]: Vrok doesn't have stable releases for linux. Upstream itself refer to the vrok-git PKGBuild. vrok downloads a master snapshot, a job vrok-git is for. Also vrok is orphaned, the buildprocess and depends not complete, so merge it with vrok-git, since it is maintained and up to date. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vrok/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vrok-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#974] Deletion Request for xvfbd
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for xvfbd [2]: RC-Script included with the tarball. Dunno how much still use the sysvinit+rc.scripts Arch used in the past, but as this package is out of date and unmaintained I assume this can be safely deleted [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xvfbd/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#973] Deletion Request for xulrunner-current
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for xulrunner-current [2]: Not entirely shure, but this seems to be an old duplicate of [community/xulrunner] (or the other way) And the -current prefix doesn't imply it's using Beta/Nightly as source Unmaintained, out of date, working replacement exists, so I think this can be nuked. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xulrunner-current/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#914] Orphan Request for webkitgtk2-svn
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Oct '14

01 Oct '14

archaurwiki [1] filed a orphan request for webkitgtk2-svn [2]: Maintainer has failed to adequately maintain package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/archaurwiki/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/webkitgtk2-svn/

2 2