April 2023 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[PRQ#40875] Deletion Request for bitwarden-desktop
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

eclairevoyant [1] filed a deletion request for bitwarden-desktop [2]: duplicate of community/bitwarden [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eclairevoyant/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bitwarden-desktop/

1 1

[PRQ#40893] Deletion Request for fleu-calamares
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for fleu-calamares [2]: Package specific for a derivate. from desc= "Calamares installer configured for FleuOS." [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/fleu-calamares/

1 1

[PRQ#40894] Deletion Request for wolframengine
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframengine [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This package downloads a prebuilt binary and does not use the -bin suffix. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RubenKelevra/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wolframengine/

2 2

[PRQ#40895] Deletion Request for mathematica
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for mathematica [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This package downloads a prebuilt binary and does not use the -bin suffix. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RubenKelevra/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mathematica/

2 2

[PRQ#40896] Deletion Request for wolframscript
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

RubenKelevra [1] filed a deletion request for wolframscript [2]: This package violates this part of the AUR submission guidelines: "Packages that use prebuilt deliverables, when the sources are available, must use the -bin suffix." This package downloads a prebuilt binary and does not use the -bin suffix. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/RubenKelevra/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wolframscript/

2 2

[PRQ#40898] Deletion Request for openmpi-gcc10
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for openmpi-gcc10 [2]: Abandoned, 0 votes, no one seems interested in this; asked on 2022-07 got no replies [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openmpi-gcc10/

1 1

[PRQ#40897] Deletion Request for apex-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for apex-bin [2]: Deprecated upstream and discouraged to use since June 2019 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/apex-bin/

1 1

[PRQ#40901] Deletion Request for onedev-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 08 Apr '23

08 Apr '23

PolarianDev [1] filed a deletion request for onedev-bin [2]: I have to make this clear, I am not submitting this request out of personal bias, I think onedev is a decent solution. On 07/04/2023, I attempted to update onedev, the update failed and human error probably caused me to accidentally destroy data, this is because data and code is stored within the same directory, which makes this highly likely you will overwrite the wrong data, and end up destroying data. This was brought up with upstream, and they clearly stated they are not interested in the idea of conforming to any conventions, such as splitting code and data up, and conforming to the linux filesystem structure. I believe strongly in keeping things as conventional as possible, but this is not why I am submitting this request, this request is because o of the final comment: https://code.onedev.io/onedev/server/~issues/1322#IssueComment-4725 The upstream owner has made it clear since the addition of this package, that he is against the idea of an AUR package. I attempted to make it work, going to lengths to discuss with Antiz and other TUs to try to get it to work. Jelle told me to drop the package like a dead horse about a month ago, I finally have come to terms that this software is not packagable. Again, this is not bias, this is me finally following upstreams wishes! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/PolarianDev/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/onedev-bin/

1 1

[PRQ#40885] Deletion Request for ttf-iskpota
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 07 Apr '23

07 Apr '23

BlurryFlurry [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-iskpota [2]: The license of the original font is proprietary. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/BlurryFlurry/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-iskpota/

2 2

[PRQ#40879] Deletion Request for ttf-iskpota
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 07 Apr '23

07 Apr '23

xiota [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-iskpota [2]: Source file has been gone for over two years. Also, license of original font is proprietary, not GPL. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xiota/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-iskpota/

1 1