- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[PRQ#80868] Merge Request for ruah
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

Dominiquini [1] filed a request to merge ruah [2] into ruah-orch [3]: Package renamed! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Dominiquini/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ruah/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ruah-orch/

1 0

[PRQ#80640] Deletion Request for tuwunel-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

Alastor [1] filed a deletion request for tuwunel-git [2]: I'm the official maintainer of "conduwuit" (https://github.com/x86pup/conduwuit) and a co-maintainer for "tuwunel" (https://github.com/matrix-construct/tuwunel) which is the official successor to conduwuit. I'm requesting deletion because this package has unnecessary inflammatory and false comments about the project being packaged in question. This package also has not been adopted since 2025-07-24, and I would adopt this package if it didn't have these comments on it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Alastor/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tuwunel-git/

3 3

[PRQ#80846] Orphan Request for remoteterm-meshcore
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

Sandwich [1] filed an orphan request for remoteterm-meshcore [2]: Hi, please reassign this package to jackkingsman, he is the original creater of this project. Thank you! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Sandwich/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/remoteterm-meshcore/

1 1

Request for package restoration / adoption: opera-gx-bin
by Zoltán 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

Hello, I would like to raise a concern regarding the removal of my package "opera-gx-bin". The package I maintained was actively updated and fully functional, while the existing alternative package in the repository appears to be outdated and not properly maintained. This is not an isolated case, as the current maintainer has multiple packages that are not kept up to date. Since the AUR does not provide a straightforward way to add co-maintainers, creating and maintaining a working alternative package is a reasonable way to ensure that the community has access to up-to-date and functional software. Removing a working and actively maintained package, while leaving an outdated and potentially broken one, does not seem to serve the best interests of the community. I would like to request one of the following: - restoration of the removed package "opera-gx-bin", or - permission to adopt and properly maintain the existing package I am willing to keep the package up to date and ensure it remains functional going forward. Thank you for your time and consideration.

2 1

[PRQ#80813] Merge Request for opera-gx-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge opera-gx-bin [2] into opera-gx-stable [3]: The maintainer added the duplicate opera-gx-bin package again after it was deleted. The opera-gx-stable package was adopted and updated. See PRQ#80683. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx-stable/

1 1

[PRQ#80810] Merge Request for opera-gx-stable
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

zedspeirs [1] filed a request to merge opera-gx-stable [2] into opera- gx-bin [3]: This package is misleading and redundant. Opera GX for Linux is currently distributed as an early access binary release and not a stable product as the name suggests. The "opera-gx- stable" naming is therefore inaccurate and confusing. The correct packaging approach is a binary package, which is already provided by "opera-gx-bin". Maintaining two separate packages for the same upstream binary makes no sense and causes unnecessary duplication. Additionally, Opera GX is a proprietary browser, so it should be distributed as a prebuilt binary package ("-bin"), not as a misleading "stable" package. I will maintain only "opera-gx-bin" going forward. Please merge opera-gx-stable into opera-gx-bin. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zedspeirs/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx-stable/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx-bin/

1 1

[PRQ#80867] Merge Request for opera-gx-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

Muflone [1] filed a request to merge opera-gx-bin [2] into opera-gx [3]: @zedspeirs I'm going to delete both opera-gx-stable and opera-gx-bin as both packages include the same software and the package name is invalid. the -bin suffix is unneded for closed source software and the -stable suffix is invalid entirely as every package is meant to be stable unless it's explicitly indicated it's not stable. please refrain to upload opera-gx-bin or opera-gx-stable again. opera-gx- stable-ffmpeg-codecs-bin is the next one, after the orphan period [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx/

1 0

[PRQ#80866] Merge Request for opera-gx-stable
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

Muflone [1] filed a request to merge opera-gx-stable [2] into opera-gx [3]: @zedspeirs I'm going to delete both opera-gx-stable and opera-gx-bin as both packages include the same software and the package name is invalid. the -bin suffix is unneded for closed source software and the -stable suffix is invalid entirely as every package is meant to be stable unless it's explicitly indicated it's not stable. please refrain to upload opera-gx-bin or opera-gx-stable again. opera-gx- stable-ffmpeg-codecs-bin is the next one, after the orphan period [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx-stable/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opera-gx/

1 0

[PRQ#80865] Deletion Request for lazychad-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

MistanKh [1] filed a deletion request for lazychad-git [2]: Package renamed to 'lazychad' to follow upstream naming. 'lazychad- git' is now redundant. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MistanKh/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lazychad-git/

1 1

[PRQ#80864] Deletion Request for qianyu-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '26

10 Apr '26

tiesen243 [1] filed a deletion request for qianyu-bin [2]: i dont want to public it [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tiesen243/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qianyu-bin/

1 1