- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28568] Orphan Request for parted-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

micwoj92 [1] filed an orphan request for parted-git [2]: Out of date for almost 2 months. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/parted-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28544] Orphan Request for vala-panel-extras-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

micwoj92 [1] filed an orphan request for vala-panel-extras-git [2]: out of date for 2 weeks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vala-panel-extras-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28557] Orphan Request for python-requests-cache
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

carlosal1015 [1] filed an orphan request for python-requests-cache [2]: This package has been marked out of date since 2021-09-07 (three weeks ago) and the current maintainer has not updated the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/carlosal1015/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-requests-cache/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28552] Orphan Request for ttf-win10
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

Raymo111 [1] filed an orphan request for ttf-win10 [2]: Has been flagged out-of-date for 5 months now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Raymo111/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-win10/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28539] Orphan Request for outguess
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

keysym [1] filed an orphan request for outguess [2]: I'm trying to help packages from https://github.com/resurrecting-open- source-projects to be available and up-to-date to Arch as they are to Debian! outguess makes part of this effort, and as it has been flagged for a while. I'm requesting to 'orphan' so I could update it! Thanks! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/keysym/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/outguess/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28784] Deletion Request for python-lsp-black
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

Archange [1] filed a deletion request for python-lsp-black [2]: In [community]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Archange/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-lsp-black/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28782] Deletion Request for python-lsp-jsonrpc
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

Rogach [1] filed a deletion request for python-lsp-jsonrpc [2]: https://archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python-lsp-jsonrpc/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Rogach/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-lsp-jsonrpc/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28781] Deletion Request for python-lsp-server
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

Archange [1] filed a deletion request for python-lsp-server [2]: https://archlinux.org/packages/community/any/python-lsp-server/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Archange/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-lsp-server/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28803] Deletion Request for opensc-gnutls-compat
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

nns [1] filed a deletion request for opensc-gnutls-compat [2]: Superseded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensc-p11-kit- module/ Package is not really about GnuTLS - GnuTLS uses p11-kit in the background so this new package is more accurate and more widely compatible. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nns/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opensc-gnutls-compat/

1 1

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#28791] Deletion Request for palemoon-bin
by Jonathon Fernyhough 19 Oct '21

19 Oct '21

On 19/10/2021 07:14, Иван Архипов wrote: > Well, if you look here > <https://gitlab.manjaro.org/packages/community/palemoon-bin/-/blob/master/PK…>, > you can see that this is a little wrong, I'm not sure what a Manjaro PKGBUILD has to do with something on the AUR? Or are you saying that the Manjaro version is correct? If so, why? > but in general I confess to you > that I violently reacted to a message from one user that he was not > going to complain about the checksum and signature. I suggested how to > skip both. But right now, I checked it, of course, with the pgp skip, > because I don’t want to import the key. I just saw a lot of packages > that were not trivially collected. Maintainer violated an elementary > rule before sending it to the AUR, he did not collect the packet, but > according to the rules he simply must. I'm not sure what you mean by "collect the packet" here. J

1 0