Search results for "arm" - Aur-requests

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#28274] Deletion Request for petalinux-v2020.1

by Alex Henrie

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 12:19 AM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > > aminvakil [1] filed a deletion request for petalinux-v2020.1 [2]: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/petalinux-v2021.1/ is already > present. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aminvakil/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/petalinux-v2020.1/ I'm surprised that petalinux-v2020.1, petalinux-v2020.2, and petalinux-v2020.3 were deleted from the AUR. It would be nice to have the older versions in the AUR because the latest version (2021.1) is not 100% compatible. And the AUR has lots of old versions of other packages like gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin, so why not petalinux? $ yay -Ssq gcc-arm-none-eabi gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-92 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-83 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-63 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-72 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-73 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-102 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-93 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-49 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-82 gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin -Alex

3 years, 1 month

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28073] Deletion Request for arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-linaro-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

curlywei [1] filed a deletion request for arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc- linaro-bin [2]: I've read here. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-linux- gnueabihf-toolchain-bin/ arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-bin (>=gcc8) seems to be same as arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-linaro-bin (<=gcc7), just rename after gcc8. Since newest version of this package has exist: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-toolchain- bin/ arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-toolchain-bin, I think maybe we could abort this AUR package. Old version (gcc7.5) I've moved to here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc75-linaro- bin/ I had deleted incorrect package (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc75-linaro-bin) Now I've fallback it. This package is what I really want to delete. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/curlywei/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-linaro-bin/

3 years, 2 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#28058] Deletion Request for arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc75-linaro-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

curlywei [1] filed a deletion request for arm-linux-gnueabihf- gcc75-linaro-bin [2]: I've read here. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-toolchain- bin/ arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-bin (>=gcc8) seems to be same as arm- linux-gnueabihf-gcc-linaro-bin (<=gcc7), just rename after gcc8. Since newest version of this package has exist: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-toolchain- bin/ arm-none-linux-gnueabihf-toolchain-bin, I think maybe we could abort this AUR package. Old version (gcc7.5) I've moved to here https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc75-linaro- bin/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/curlywei/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc75-linaro-bin/

3 years, 2 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#29416] Merge Request for qemu-arm-static

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

robertfoster [1] filed a request to merge qemu-arm-static [2] into qemu-arm-static-bin [3]: This package will properly move to qemu-arm-static-bin [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/robertfoster/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qemu-arm-static/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qemu-arm-static-bin/

2 years, 11 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#28274] Deletion Request for petalinux-v2020.1

by Amin Vakil

On 9/20/21 20:38, Alex Henrie wrote: > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 12:19 AM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: >> >> aminvakil [1] filed a deletion request for petalinux-v2020.1 [2]: >> >> https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/petalinux-v2021.1/ is already >> present. >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/aminvakil/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/petalinux-v2020.1/ > > I'm surprised that petalinux-v2020.1, petalinux-v2020.2, and > petalinux-v2020.3 were deleted from the AUR. It would be nice to have > the older versions in the AUR because the latest version (2021.1) is > not 100% compatible. And the AUR has lots of old versions of other > packages like gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin, so why not petalinux? > > $ yay -Ssq gcc-arm-none-eabi > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-92 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-83 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-63 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-72 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-73 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-102 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-93 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-49 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin-82 > gcc-arm-none-eabi-bin > > -Alex > Thanks for bringing this up, I've submitted deletion requests for all of them as well. Best Regards, Amin Vakil

3 years, 1 month

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7077] Deletion Request for arm-android-gnueabihf-gcc

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

ametisf [1] filed a deletion request for arm-android-gnueabihf-gcc [2]: Hello. I apologize for the hassle, but I've misunderstood how AUR repository works and have uploaded packages prior to properly testing them. I would like to delete my packages from family arm-android- gnueabihf-{gcc,binutils,...} and arm-android-eabi-{gcc,binutils,...}, as they will not build correctly. The final and working package is arm-linux-gnueabihf-android-linux-api-headers which I would like to preserve. Thanks a lot. ametisf [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ametisf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-android-gnueabihf-gcc/

7 years, 10 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#2450] Merge Request for arm-linux-gnueabi-linux-api-headers26

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

yuyichao [1] filed a request to merge arm-linux-gnueabi-linux-api-headers26 [2] into arm-linux-gnueabi-linux-api-headers [3]: Old version of the package with obsolete name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yuyichao/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-linux-gnueabi-linux-api-headers26/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-linux-gnueabi-linux-api-headers/

9 years, 8 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#16966] Merge Request for arm-frc-linux-gnueabi-frcmake-hg

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

haawda [1] filed a request to merge arm-frc-linux-gnueabi-frcmake-hg [2] into arm-frc-linux-gnueabi-frcmake-git [3]: See the comments in AUR. Upstream moved to git. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/haawda/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-frc-linux-gnueabi-frcmake-hg/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-frc-linux-gnueabi-frcmake-git/

4 years, 11 months

[PRQ#57786] Merge Request for jdk-arm

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge jdk-arm [2] into jdk8 [3]: 'jdk-arm' is not compatible with Arch Linux. ARM-targeted foreign binary sources can be added to AUR/jdk8. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jdk-arm/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jdk8/

7 months, 4 weeks

[PRQ#62096] Deletion Request for arm-none-eabi-gcc49-linaro-alternative

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for arm-none-eabi-gcc49-linaro- alternative [2]: Fails to build from source, and a duplicate of AUR/arm-none-eabi- gcc49-linaro. [a] [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arm-none-eabi-gcc49-linaro [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-none-eabi-gcc49-linaro-alternative/

2 months, 4 weeks

Aur-requests search results for query "arm"