Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#3237] Deletion Request for webkitgtk-svn

by Doug Newgard

On Wed, 6 May 2015 00:31:18 +0000 (UTC) notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > nathancatlow [1] filed a deletion request for webkitgtk-svn [2]: > > Is it possible to delete this out of date package so I can replace > with one that works? I have a working package here based on > webkitgtk-hidpi and hooked up to the webkit SVN... I have taken > ownership of this package but I cannot seem to update it, error is: > "Not allowed to overwrite existing packages" > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nathancatlow/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/webkitgtk-svn/ Are you trying to change the pkgbase?

10 years, 7 months

Re: [PRQ#70929] Deletion Request for vapoursynth-plugin-vsffdnet-git

by Fabio Loli

Il 09/03/25 01:29, sL1pKn07 SpinFlo ha scritto: > > > El sáb, 8 mar 2025 a las 17:33, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > <mailto:notify@aur.archlinux.org>> escribió: > > sl1pkn07 [1] filed a deletion request for vapoursynth-plugin-vsffdnet- > git [2]: > > gone > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sl1pkn07/ <https:// > aur.archlinux.org/account/sl1pkn07/> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vapoursynth-plugin-vsffdnet- > git/ <https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vapoursynth-plugin-vsffdnet- > git/> > > > Hi > > please keep this. i just found a fork > > greetings Hi, you can void your own requests here https://aur.archlinux.org/requests

9 months, 1 week

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#29496] Deletion Request for vault-bin

by Fabio Loli

Il 18/11/21 10:53, Óscar García Amor via aur-requests ha scritto: > El jue, 18 nov 2021 a las 9:58, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > <mailto:notify@aur.archlinux.org>> escribió: > > grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for vault-bin [2]: > > Package exists: > https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/vault/ > <https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/vault/> > > -bin package not is same that a community package > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ > <https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/> > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vault-bin/ > <https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vault-bin/> In what differ from the community package aside that is the official binary?

4 years, 1 month

[PRQ#73025] Deletion Request for ros-noetic-four-wheel-steering-controller

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ros-noetic-four-wheel- steering-controller [2]: Fails to build, along with core libraries in its dependency chain. These have also been unmaintained on AUR for 2+ years. See e.g. AUR/ros-noetic-tf. [a] This package does not have reverse dependencies. Votes 0, popularity 0.000000. Only the non-EOL "ros2-*" AUR packages are compatible with Arch Linux. ROS1 is based on Python 3.9, Qt 5.12, CMake 3 and the EOL Ubuntu 20.04. [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ros-noetic-tf [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ros-noetic-four-wheel-steering-controller/

7 months, 2 weeks

Re: [PRQ#77056] Deletion Request for scotch

by Samuel Williams

As a past maintainer of this package, I agree with this. > On 23 Oct 2025, at 6:46 PM, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > > medaminezghal [1] filed a request to merge scotch [2] into scotch [3]: > > It's already exist in offical repo: > https://archlinux.org/packages/extra-testing/x86_64/scotch/ > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/medaminezghal/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/scotch/ > [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/scotch/

1 month, 3 weeks

Re: [PRQ#66729] Deletion Request for moodle-stable

by v＠minakov.pro

notify(a)aur.archlinux.org писал(а) 2024-11-27 20:35: > FabioLolix [1 [1]] filed a deletion request for moodle-stable [2 [2]]: > > Duplicate of 'moodle', user VVL didn't even wait a day after flagging > OOD before uploading > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/moodle-stable/ These packages are different. The moodle package uses the current branch, while the moodle-stable package uses the stable release branch. Also, the moodle-stable package uses native archlinux file system mechanics. Links: ------ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/moodle-stable/

1 year

[PRQ#58498] Deletion Request for python-visvis

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python-visvis [2]: This library is deprecated and is no longer needed by any AUR builds. It was declared no longer developed by upstream 7 years ago. [a] Developer recommended Vispy as a more future-proof approach. That library is available on AUR and does have reverse dependencies. [b] 2 years ago, developer announce that they are working on a new alternative called PyGfx. [c] [a]: https://github.com/almarklein/visvis/commit/cc5fed1 [b]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-vispy [c]: https://github.com/almarklein/visvis/commit/c94e572 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-visvis/

1 year, 8 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#27846] Deletion Request for iwlwifi-7265-ucode

by Ramadan Ali

iwlwifi-7265-ucode [1] contains two different files `iwlwifi-7265-14.ucode` and `iwlwifi-7265-14D.ucode` wich are not present in linux-firmware [2] Maybe `iwlwifi-7265-ucode` can be renamed as `iwlwifi-7265-14-ucode`, but I think it's not necessary alicavus [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/iwlwifi-7265-ucode/ [2] https://archlinux.org/packages/core/any/linux-firmware/ On 8/30/21 2:12 AM, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for iwlwifi-7265-ucode > [2]: > > This is included in the linux-firmware package. > > Also with PRQ#27845, I meant to say linux-firmware, not the kernel. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/iwlwifi-7265-ucode/ >

4 years, 3 months

[PRQ#67232] Deletion Request for gnome-shell-extension-emoji-selector-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gnome-shell-extension-emoji- selector-git [2]: Upstream is abandonware since 18+ months ago [a]; the code itself does not work on GNOME 45+. [b] As mentioned by a user in the comment thread of issue #193 [c], there is a maintained successor fork called emoji-copy. A package for the latter is available on AUR. [d] [a]: https://github.com/maoschanz/emoji-selector-for-gnome [b]: https://github.com/maoschanz/emoji-selector-for-gnome/issues [c]: https://github.com/maoschanz/emoji-selector-for-gnome/issues/193 [d]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-shell-extension-emoji-copy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-shell-extension-emoji-selector-git/

1 year

[PRQ#69205] Deletion Request for gnome-shell-extension-emoji-selector-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for gnome-shell-extension-emoji- selector-git [2]: Upstream is abandonware since ~2 years ago [a]; the code itself does not work on GNOME 45+. [b] As mentioned by a user in the comment thread of issue #193 [c], there is a maintained successor fork called emoji-copy. A package for the latter is available on AUR. [d] [a]: https://github.com/maoschanz/emoji-selector-for-gnome [b]: https://github.com/maoschanz/emoji-selector-for-gnome/issues [c]: https://github.com/maoschanz/emoji-selector-for-gnome/issues/193 [d]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-shell-extension-emoji-copy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-shell-extension-emoji-selector-git/

10 months, 2 weeks

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"