Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#67402] Deletion Request for python-migen

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge python-migen [2] into python- migen-git [3]: Better to keep only AUR/python-migen-git. [a] Upstream seems to only support building from the git master branch. [b] Atm, both AUR packages are orphans, and broken on Python 3.13. But there is already a fix patch submitted as PR#298 [c], bound for the master branch. The last stable release is from 5 years ago (2019), lacks compatibility with many hardware devices, and has dozens of known bugs that are only fixed in master. [d] [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-migen-git [b]: https://m-labs.hk/migen/manual/introduction.html#installing-migen [c]: https://github.com/m-labs/migen/pull/298 [d]: https://github.com/m-labs/migen/compare/0.9.2...master [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-migen/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-migen-git/

1 year

[PRQ#72316] Deletion Request for ghc-cabal-arts

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ghc-cabal-arts [2]: Abandoned, outdated bundled package. Newer ghc and ghc-libs are available in Arch/extra repo. [a] The latest upstream build of cabal-install is on AUR as a '-bin' PKGBUILD [b]. (And Arch/extra has a somewhat older but still compatible version of cabal-install. [c]) This one has been neglected for 2+ years - last update was in Jan 2023. Seems it's also unused: 0 popularity/votes/comments or specific/exclusive reverse dependencies. [a]: https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=ghc [b]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cabal-install-bin [c]: https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=cabal-install [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ghc-cabal-arts/

8 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35888] Deletion Request for oomox

by Marcell Meszaros

Re: Sat Jun 25 20:48:35 UTC 2022 > actionless [1] filed a deletion request for oomox [2]: > > yup, i think so > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/actionless/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/oomox/ Co-maintainer @actionless has responded with this separate deletion request to my previous submission for the same. I have revoked that instance, but now I am including its original text here, as a reference: Sat Jun 25 20:09:09 UTC 2022 MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for oomox [2]: Obsolete package according to maintainer @actionless: > this theme is now included in its former dependency > AUR/themix-full-git. The latter is set to conflict with this, intending to indicate that this package should not be possible to install anymore. As maintainer has put out the public notice about this change a year ago, now I think it can be deleted with peace of mind - everyone concerned must have gotten this info already. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/oomox/

3 years, 5 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#23516] Deletion Request for solunar-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

m040601 [1] filed a deletion request for solunar-git [2]: This PKGBUILD needs an update, or, better yet, it should be removed from the AUR. The "url" doesnt exist anymore, http://kevinboone.net/README_solunar.html It should be updated to url='https://github.com/kevinboone/solunar_cmdline' And more important, this is what the developer has to say: RETIRED! (..) Please note that this utility is obsolete, and I won't be developing it any further, or fixing any more bugs. I've started an entirely new implementation, which is avilable here: https://github.com/kevinboone/solunar2 (...) And we already have in fact, https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/solunar2-git/ Although it seems to be orphan. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/m040601/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/solunar-git/

4 years, 10 months

[PRQ#64986] Deletion Request for glfw-wayland-minecraft-libdecoration

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge glfw-wayland-minecraft- libdecoration [2] into glfw-wayland-minecraft-cursorfix [3]: libdecoration support has been incorporated into upstream glfw's current release, v3.4. (See last AUR comment, made by @AvianaCruz on 2023-04-01.) Also this package has been superseded by the actively maintained 'glfw-wayland-minecraft-cursorfix'. [a] [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glfw-wayland-minecraft-cursorfix [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/glfw-wayland-minecraft-libdecoration/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/glfw-wayland-minecraft-cursorfix/

1 year, 1 month

Re: [PRQ#50204] Merge Request for python-restructuredtext-lint

by Marcell Meszaros

In this particular case, I don't think there's any meaningful difference between a deletion and a merge. The pkgbase 'python-restructuredtext-lint' has 0 votes, and only 1 comment, from me. (And its also OOD-flagged by me.) I wanted my comment be gone and not kept forever, as that is only relevant to the packaging issue in 'python-restructuredtext-lint' but not to the proper, working 'python-restructuredtext_lint' pkg. On 4 November 2023 00:04:34 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >yochananmarqos [1] filed a request to merge python-restructuredtext- >lint [2] into python-restructuredtext_lint [3]: > >PRQ#46263 should have been a merge request, not a deletion request-- >that is, if we're going to keep python-restructuredtext_lint instead. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-restructuredtext-lint/ >[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-restructuredtext_lint/

2 years, 1 month

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32958] Deletion Request for nvidia-vulkan

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for nvidia-vulkan [2]: NVIDIA Vulkan 1.3 beta program seems to have been ended. NVIDIA has merged (mainstreamed) its Vulkan 1.3 development branch to its general release driver: Last beta with Vulkan 1.3: v470.62.22 (2022-01-25) Last general release driver with Vulkan 1.3: v510.54 (2022-02-14) Preceding (v510.47.03) release notes announcing general availability of Vulkan 1.3 support: https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/linux-solaris-and-freebsd- driver-510-47-03-production-branch-release/202217/3 There is no further need for "nvidia-vulkan" packages. All NVIDIA drivers from now on will be based on Vulkan. Stable NVIDIA drivers with Vulkan 1.3 are in Arch repos. Meanwhile, AUR carries NVIDIA beta driver packages supporting Vulkan 1.3, maintained by Arch Linux developer @dbermond: - nvidia-beta: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-beta - nvidia-beta-dkms: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-beta-dkms - nvidia-utils-beta, opencl-nvidia-beta, nvidia-settings-beta: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nvidia-utils-beta - lib32-nvidia-utils-beta, lib32-opencl-nvidia-beta: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-nvidia-utils-beta Therefore I suggest there is no further need to keep this nvidia- vulkan package base, as it has become obsolete by upstream changes. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nvidia-vulkan/

3 years, 9 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35889] Deletion Request for oomox-git

by Marcell Meszaros

Re: Sat Jun 25 20:48:48 UTC 2022 > actionless [1] filed a deletion request for oomox-git [2]: > > yup, i think so > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/actionless/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/oomox-git/ Co-maintainer @actionless has responded with this separate deletion request to my previous submission for the same. I have revoked that instance, but now I am including its original text here, as a reference: Sat Jun 25 20:14:10 UTC 2022 MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for oomox-git [2]: Obsolete package according to maintainer @actionless: > this theme is now included in its former dependency > AUR/themix-full-git. The latter is set to conflict with this, intending to indicate that this package should not be possible to install anymore. As maintainer has put out the public notice about this change a year ago, now I think it can be deleted with peace of mind - everyone concerned must have gotten this info already. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/oomox-git/

3 years, 5 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26335] Deletion Request for pgadmin4-latest

by Fabrizio Del Tin

I oppose to this idiot request. Currently no pgadmin4 is working, either in the arch main repository or in the AUR. Mine is the only working one. There is nothing wrong with a pip install, as it is one of the advised installation methods proposed on the pgadmin website. On 2021-06-09 17:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > FabioLolix [1 [1]] filed a deletion request for pgadmin4-latest [2 > [2]]: > > "latest" and particularly horrible pkgbuild, what is installed as > /usr/bin/pgadmin4 is a shell script that perform "pip install > pgadmin4" and other commands. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pgadmin4-latest/ Links: ------ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pgadmin4-latest/

4 years, 6 months

Re: [PRQ#43055] Deletion Request for xorg-server-dev

by Marcell Meszaros

AUR/xorg-server-git [a] seems to be a well-maintained alternative, which also aligns well with repo's split package structure, whereas this creates other subpackage thar have since been separated by upstream (e.g. xwayland). [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xorg-server-git On 28 June 2023 20:39:14 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for xorg-server-dev [2]: > >Orphan dev version package from 2021 for xorg-server. > >I've flagged it OOD a year ago. > >I think it's better to delete it, as it's just a defunct leftover >without maintenance. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/xorg-server-dev/

2 years, 4 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"