Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#50287] Deletion Request for qt5ct-svn

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for qt5ct-svn [2]: Unused, broken VCS package from 2018. I recommend deletion, as this third-party Qt5-only utility's upstream is in minimal maintenance mode, with only a few minor translation and dependency/buildconfig bumps added occasionally. The project quickly creates a new point release after those adjustments. Therefore a working VCS package would only create a duplicate of repo's qt5ct almost all of the time. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qt5ct-svn/

1 year, 9 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#777] Deletion Request for superhexagon

by moebius282＠gmail.com

On 11.09.2014 16:05, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > faiz [1] filed a deletion request for superhexagon [2]: > > Illegal download. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/faiz/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/superhexagon/ > There's no illegal download. If he would have informed yourself before running around and spreading FUD he would have noticed that you in fact have to own the game to use this PKGBUILD. All it does is repackage the official binary to create a better integrated package/experience. - Jochen

10 years, 11 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#11863] Deletion Request for nvidia-container-runtime-hook

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

gspu [1] filed a deletion request for nvidia-container-runtime-hook [2]: lukeyeager commented on 2018-06-04 17:49 Good point. Disowned. Have at it! Eschwartz commented on 2018-05-24 00:32 (edited on 2018-05-24 00:38 by Eschwartz) This should build the golang sources from https://github.com/NVIDIA/nvidia-container- runtime/tree/master/hook/nvidia-container-runtime-hook If you want a package using some random Centos prebuilt stuff, upload a separate nvidia-container-runtime-hook-bin package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gspu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nvidia-container-runtime-hook/

7 years, 2 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#20670] Deletion Request for kewld

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

caltlgin [1] filed a deletion request for kewld [2]: - Needs to be renamed to a `-git` package, or use **static releases** as per https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_package_guidelines - Missing `makedepends=('git')`. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#depends - Missing `pkgver` function. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_package_guidelines#The_pkgver()_fu… - Please add a **comment line** to the top of the `PKGBUILD` file which contains information about the current **maintainers** and previous **contributors**. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_sub… [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/caltlgin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kewld/

5 years

[aur-requests] [PRQ#30250] Deletion Request for ros-kinetic-hector-gazebo-plugins

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

zoorat [1] filed a deletion request for ros-kinetic-hector-gazebo- plugins [2]: Maintainer: majorx234 Broken Dependency: ros-kinetic-roscpp, ros-kinetic-gazebo-ros, ros- kinetic-gazebo-plugins, ros-kinetic-std-msgs, ros-kinetic-std-srvs, ros-kinetic-geometry-msgs, ros-kinetic-nav-msgs, ros-kinetic-tf, ros- kinetic-dynamic-reconfigure, ros-kinetic-message-runtime, ros-kinetic- catkin, ros-kinetic-gazebo-dev, ros-kinetic-message-generation Votes: 1 Popularity: 0 Last Modified: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 00:45:42 GMT (3 years ago) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zoorat/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ros-kinetic-hector-gazebo-plugins/

3 years, 8 months

[PRQ#53103] Deletion Request for onnxruntime-cuda-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for onnxruntime-cuda-bin [2]: Not actively maintained on AUR; currently several point releases behind the newest release. Also, upstream's build is insecure, with executables having RPATH entries for dirs in /usr/local, and lacking RELRO. But this package is no longer needed now that Arch extra repo carries the latest version of onnxruntime-cuda. [a] [a]: https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=onnxruntime-cuda [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/onnxruntime-cuda-bin/

1 year, 7 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7390] Deletion Request for update-pacman-mirrorlist

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for update-pacman-mirrorlist [2]: The AUR is not a hosting provider for source code, and whether that source code uses a compiler to compile to an ELF binary is irrelevant to that fact. Additionally, "reflector" which is in community and has existed far longer than this program, does everything that this program does, better than this program does (with the exception of the systemd timer for daily mirrorlist updates, because daily mirrorlist updates are objectively stupid). The maintainer has previously been warned against this in the comments, and justified using the AUR as a hosting provider because: "No, I really do not. What advantage would that bring? It would most certainly over complicate the PKGBUILD and management of the project, introduce additional potential for downtime, and require another trusted party to host code." In addition to deleting this pkgbase, someone with backend access should probably purge it too, since the aur.git backend really shouldn't have to store non-buildfiles resources in perpetuity (this is, after all, the reason the AUR code tries to reject all blobs above a certain size, and why actual hosting providers like Github exist). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Eschwartz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/update-pacman-mirrorlist/

8 years, 7 months

[PRQ#42776] Deletion Request for iraf-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Mr.Smith1974 [1] filed a deletion request for iraf-bin [2]: please remove this package: https://iraf-community.github.io/ Please be aware the IRAF is 35 years old legacy code and institutional support for IRAF and its usage is going away quickly. It is recommended to search alternative solutions, for example in the Astropy community, and not to start new projects using IRAF. See this article in the STScI newsletter for rationale and recommendations. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Mr.Smith1974/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/iraf-bin/

2 years, 2 months

[PRQ#42777] Deletion Request for python-pyraf

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Mr.Smith1974 [1] filed a deletion request for python-pyraf [2]: please remove this package: https://iraf-community.github.io/ Please be aware the IRAF is 35 years old legacy code and institutional support for IRAF and its usage is going away quickly. It is recommended to search alternative solutions, for example in the Astropy community, and not to start new projects using IRAF. See this article in the STScI newsletter for rationale and recommendations. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Mr.Smith1974/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pyraf/

2 years, 2 months

[PRQ#46129] Deletion Request for libdv-gtk2

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for libdv-gtk2 [2]: Orphan variant of repo's libdv, last updated in 2021. Does not have the needed provides and conflicts, even though it cannot co-exist with the repo package. The gtk2 dependency is only for its optional DV video player executable. Not needed, as GStreamer-based applications can decode and play DV video. So the library available in repo should be sufficient for everyone. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libdv-gtk2/

2 years

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"