Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[aur-requests] [PRQ#34612] Deletion Request for onyx-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for onyx-bin [2]: Orphaned package for experimental app discontinued in 2018. It was meant to be a messaging app with strong security and privacy, based on the Ethereum Swarm's PSS feature. As it never reached production quality, it is likely insecure, if it works at all (didn't try). I think it is not useful to keep this AUR package for such abandoned alpha quality software. There are numerous working alternatives for messaging and online collaboration. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/onyx-bin/

3 years, 3 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#7834] Merge Request for soundconverter-py3k-git

by Bruno Pagani

Le 02/04/2017 à 04:21, Stefan Husmann a écrit : > notify(a)aur.archlinux.org writes: > >> archdria [1] filed a request to merge soundconverter-py3k-git [2] into >> soundconverter-git [3]: >> >> They are now the same package >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/archdria/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/soundconverter-py3k-git/ >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/soundconverter-git/ > I as the former maintainer of sounconverter-git second this request. > > Thanks So I guess I should drop the deletion request you filed the day before against the destination package? Bruno

8 years, 4 months

Re: [PRQ#42913] Deletion Request for picom-rounded-corners

by kamus＠hadenes.io

Flagged, disowned and requested deletion On 27 Jun 2023 12:30 -0300, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org, wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for picom-rounded-corners [2]: > > Abandoned fork of picom-git; last updated 3 years ago. [a] > > Package name also wrong (this is a VCS package). > > But upstream picom's newest commit was one day before I am writing > this request. [b] > > Please delete this obsolete fork. > > [a]: https://github.com/sdhand/picom > [b]: https://github.com/yshui/picom > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/picom-rounded-corners/

2 years, 1 month

[aur-requests] [PRQ#1144] Deletion Request for freespeak

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for freespeak [2]: BerliOS was closed and apparantly this program wasn't transitioned to sourceforge. The gtk-apps[4] page links also to the berlios page. The creator Luca Bruno (also known as lucabru[5] and Lethalman) is on github[6] but there is no repo of it. So I suppose this is gone and the PKGBuild can be deleted. __________ [4] http://gtk-apps.org/content/show.php/FreeSpeak?content=90887 [5] https://launchpad.net/~lucabru [6] https://github.com/lethalman [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/freespeak/

10 years, 9 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#1316] Deletion Request for vim-default-editor

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

lahwaacz [1] filed a deletion request for vim-default-editor [2]: $ cat vim-default-editor.sh #!/bin/sh # Set vim as the default editor in the shell export EDITOR=/usr/bin/vim export FCEDIT=/usr/bin/vim export VISUAL=/usr/bin/vim The PKGBUILD is 423 bytes and the script itself only 138 bytes ... This is the stuff that should be described in the wiki [1], there is no point in creating a package. [1]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Cron#Default_editor [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/lahwaacz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vim-default-editor/

10 years, 9 months

[PRQ#66298] Deletion Request for gnome-mines-3.12.2 Accepted

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Request #66298 has been Accepted by bertptrs [1]: This is in fact the correct way to name a pkgbase for a specific older version of a package. However, there appears to be no reason to package this particular version, and it doesn't build, so it can indeed be removed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/

8 months, 3 weeks

[PRQ#65859] Deletion Request for gnome-mines-3.12.2 Accepted

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Request #65859 has been Accepted by bertptrs [1]: This is in fact the correct way to name a pkgbase for a specific older version of a package. However, there appears to be no reason to package this particular version, and it doesn't build, so it can indeed be removed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bertptrs/

8 months, 3 weeks

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#3328] Request Rejected

by Bruno Pagani

Le 18/05/2015 00:01, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org a écrit : > Request #3328 has been rejected by Muflone [1]: > > First of all are you sure you want to lose all the votes the exfalso > package has? After deletion there's no way to restore them. > > Apart that, from your request you seem to want upload a package > (pkgbase) named quodlibet, which is in conflict with the > extra/quodlibet package. > Please see: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards#AUR_packages > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ I know that I can’t upload quodlibet since it’s already in extra, here I only use quodlibet in $pkgbase. I thought this was an appropriate use of the $pkgbase var (according to https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#pkgbase) For instance, I use this for krita too (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/krita/) where the pkg differs from calligra-krita because it doesn’t depends on calligra-libs and calligra-filters (thus avoiding pulling in kdepim), since only the relevant ones for Krita are built(-in). I’m going to open an feature request against quodlibet packaging, and will comme back here when I have an answer for the future of this package. Thanks, Bruno

10 years, 2 months

[PRQ#39781] Deletion Request for cairo-ubuntu

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

xiota [1] filed a deletion request for cairo-ubuntu [2]: Orphaned, outdated package. Although the package name and description state that the source of the patches is Ubuntu, I could trace only one back to Ubuntu, and it was dropped 6-7 years ago. Two of the patches appear to address issues that have already been fixed upstream. The remaining patch overrides a native cairo preference with one set in another program. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xiota/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cairo-ubuntu/

2 years, 6 months

[PRQ#41241] Deletion Request for ttf-font-nerd-dummy

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

a821 [1] filed a deletion request for ttf-font-nerd-dummy [2]: This dummy package was created as response to #74050 [3]. The hard dependency `ttf-font-nerd` in `starship` was dropped last December [4]. I asked the maintainer two months ago if this package is still needed, but received no reply. I think we can delete it. [3] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/74050 [4] https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit- community/commit/f48436536b11cae2628b6d4412e20b28ba5a95cd [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a821/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ttf-font-nerd-dummy/

2 years, 3 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"