Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#45907] Deletion Request for qweechat-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for qweechat-git [2]: Broken Python2 based VCS package from 2020; one-time effort. While upstream is still active, this package is defunct due to unsupported source URL protocol and wrong dependencies. So as it seems no one was interested in taking up maintenance all these years, I think it's better to delete it. (Can be recreated if someone is willing to do so.) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qweechat-git/

2 years

[PRQ#48987] Deletion Request for openstack-horizon

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for openstack-horizon [2]: Broken, unmaintained package, last updated in 2021-09. Owner MIA since 1.5+ year. Depends on many similarly outdated, defunct modules from same owner, including many dual Python2/Python3 packages with missing or defunct dependencies. Not useful to keep on AUR. 0 votes/comments. Upstream is very actively developed, and frequently pushes updates to PyPI, from where users can easily install the latest version. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openstack-horizon/

1 year, 10 months

[PRQ#50353] Deletion Request for pcsxr-gtk2

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for pcsxr-gtk2 [2]: Broken, unused PSX emulator pkg, last updated in 2020. Last comment is also from same year. Source is missing (404). Users can still choose alternatives: - AUR/pcsxr [a] (source is reachable, builds fine), - AUR/pcsx-redux-git [b] (actively developed continuation fork; the 'pcsxr' fork is abandoned since 2020). [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcsxr [b]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcsx-redux-git [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pcsxr-gtk2/

1 year, 9 months

[PRQ#60019] Deletion Request for com.seewo.easicamera

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for com.seewo.easicamera [2]: EOL version from 3 years ago. Upstream stopped supporting Linux. It seems the application no longer can connect to a remote classroom. It can only play the input of the webcam. It also depends on an old insecure electron8 runtime. I don't think this is useful to keep. The latest Windows version can be used with wine. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/com.seewo.easicamera/

1 year, 3 months

[PRQ#73007] Deletion Request for ros-noetic-eigenpy

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ros-noetic-eigenpy [2]: Broken, unused, EOL library from 2022. ROS1 Noetic is EOL too, and its libraries are no longer compatible with Arch Linux, only with Python 3.9 and the already EOL Ubuntu 20.04 and Qt 5.12. Only the ROS2 distribution's packages are maintained by upstream and on AUR, and only those are viable to build and run on Arch Linux. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ros-noetic-eigenpy/

3 months, 2 weeks

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#7834] Merge Request for soundconverter-py3k-git

by Bruno Pagani

Le 02/04/2017 à 04:21, Stefan Husmann a écrit : > notify(a)aur.archlinux.org writes: > >> archdria [1] filed a request to merge soundconverter-py3k-git [2] into >> soundconverter-git [3]: >> >> They are now the same package >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/archdria/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/soundconverter-py3k-git/ >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/soundconverter-git/ > I as the former maintainer of sounconverter-git second this request. > > Thanks So I guess I should drop the deletion request you filed the day before against the destination package? Bruno

8 years, 4 months

Re: [PRQ#43688] Deletion Request for wahcade

by Marcell Meszaros

Also the sources and upstream URL are gone (website shows only an empty white page). On 6 July 2023 00:25:26 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wahcade [2]: > >Defunct and orphan Python2/Gtk2 based package. > >This was a minimal GUI front-end for arcade emulators like MAME. > >Last released in 2009. > >I recommend deletion, for lack of interest from anyone in maintaining >it, and because there are viable alternatives. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wahcade/

1 year, 11 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#8429] Deletion Request for i3lock-fancy-git-fixed

by Henry Nelson

i3lock-fancy-git has not built for months and the maintainer is not responding. I requested it be marked as an orphan, but nothing has come of that yet. I made this package only as a temporary alternative while i3lock-fancy-git does not build. On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 11:46 PM, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > Scimmia [1] filed a deletion request for i3lock-fancy-git-fixed [2]: > > duplicate of i3lock-fancy-git > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Scimmia/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/i3lock-fancy-git-fixed/ >

8 years, 1 month

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11150] Deletion Request for kodi-devel-platform

by Eli Schwartz

On 04/16/2018 06:01 PM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > graysky [1] filed a deletion request for kodi-devel-platform [2]: > > Redundant and unmaintained. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/graysky/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kodi-devel-platform/ I see that it is unmaintained, but not having much of anything to do with kodi I'm unsure how it is redundant. Are they just duplicative of the community packages? For that matter I'm unsure what kodi-devel does different from kodi. -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User

7 years, 3 months

[PRQ#38957] Deletion Request for deepin-udis86

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

SamLukeYes [1] filed a deletion request for deepin-udis86 [2]: This package was deleted because it didn't follow package guidelines. If the 32-bit binary package from deepin is really needed, it should be named as lib32-udis86-deepin-bin, and avoid the conflict to the 64-bit package udis86. deepin-udis86 should only exist as a string in provides for backward compatibility, since there are packages depending on this name, which is not correct. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/SamLukeYes/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/deepin-udis86/

2 years, 8 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"