Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7077] Deletion Request for arm-android-gnueabihf-gcc

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

ametisf [1] filed a deletion request for arm-android-gnueabihf-gcc [2]: Hello. I apologize for the hassle, but I've misunderstood how AUR repository works and have uploaded packages prior to properly testing them. I would like to delete my packages from family arm-android- gnueabihf-{gcc,binutils,...} and arm-android-eabi-{gcc,binutils,...}, as they will not build correctly. The final and working package is arm-linux-gnueabihf-android-linux-api-headers which I would like to preserve. Thanks a lot. ametisf [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ametisf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-android-gnueabihf-gcc/

8 years, 7 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#21300] Deletion Request for opencinematools

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for opencinematools [2]: Archived project, cant be compiled anymore ../../src/mkpkl.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, const char**)’: ../../src/mkpkl.cpp:516:13: error: ‘StringIsXML’ was not declared in this scope 516 | if (StringIsXML(document.c_str(), document.length())) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ ../../src/mkmap.cpp: In function ‘int main(int, const char**)’: ../../src/mkmap.cpp:463:13: error: ‘StringIsXML’ was not declared in this scope 463 | if (StringIsXML(document.c_str(), document.length())) { | ^~~~~~~~~~~ make: *** [Makefile:10: mkpkl] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make: *** [Makefile:13: mkmap] Error 1 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opencinematools/

4 years, 10 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#29378] Deletion Request for glibc-x86_64

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for glibc-x86_64 [2]: Duplicate package. "The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the official package database for the package. If any version of it exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of- date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking a feature, then please file a bug report." https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/glibc-x86_64/

3 years, 8 months

[PRQ#64361] Deletion Request for proot-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for proot-bin [2]: Outdated for 18+ months, and upstream has not published binary builds for the latest git release tag version. At this point I think it is best for users to no longer get this abandoned package offered and instead be left with a choice from one of the more up-to-date and maintained source-based alternatives on AUR. [a][b] [a]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/proot [b]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/proot-termux [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/proot-bin/

9 months, 3 weeks

[PRQ#74720] Deletion Request for godot-headless-export-templates-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

xiota [1] filed a deletion request for godot-headless-export- templates-bin [2]: Flagged for a month with no response from maintainer, but really out of date for years. Maintainer last logged in to AUR was 2024-10-11. Should be deleted based on not meeting the usefulness criterion. Headless packages for godot aren't especially useful because regular godot builds can be used with `--display-driver headless` option. No evidence of active users. Zero pkgstats. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xiota/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/godot-headless-export-templates-bin/

2 weeks, 5 days

回复：[PRQ#60684] Deletion Request for wechat-arch-linux Accepted

by .

I am soooo sorry for my problem package your honor.  but i thing the reason why this user send request is not because of  the package first time he flag my package out of date with reason "unsuitable package name (with dirty word)  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 您的软件包 wechat-arch-linux [1] 已被用户 halo-shit [2] 标记为过期：瞎鸡儿起名 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-arch-linux/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/halo-shit/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- so i feel angry and puzzle and ask him this just the package i use by myself why you do this (i also with some dirty cause i feel angry)? but  he didnt answer my question and he insulted my mother and cursed her to die.  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 您的软件包 wechat-arch-linux [1] 已被用户 halo-shit [2] 标记为过期：你妈刚刚别车创死了 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-arch-lin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 您的软件包 wechat-arch-linux [1] 已被用户 halo-shit [2] 标记为过期：你妈妈刚刚被人创死了 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wechat-arch-linux/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/halo-shit/ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i really feel angry with this but i have no ideal how to deal with this i hope you could ban him or give me a reason why he do this shit!!!!!! ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ 发件人: "aur-requests" <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org>; 发送时间: 2024年6月3日(星期一) 下午5:06 收件人: "aur-requests"<aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org>; 主题: [PRQ#60684] Deletion Request for wechat-arch-linux Accepted Request #60684 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: Indeed, really low quality package with questionable things (like git cloning a 3rd party repo in the package() function to install stuff from it in $pkgdir, questionable actions ran in the .install script, etc...). @linzeen Please, take a look at https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD & https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines For what it's worth, methods to install wechat on Arch Linux are already documented in https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WeChat [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

1 year, 2 months

[PRQ#37830] Deletion Request for blender-wayland-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

jtheoof [1] filed a deletion request for blender-wayland-git [2]: This package now becomes irrelevant since Blender now defaults to GHOST_WAYLAND ON by default. See the communication here: https://code.blender.org/2022/10/wayland-support-on-linux/ This package can now be replaced by the blender-git AUR package and Wayland support should land in official blender package with version 3.4. I have tested blender-git and it's built with Wayland by default. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jtheoof/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/blender-wayland-git/

2 years, 9 months

[PRQ#38948] Deletion Request for e2studio

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Trilby [1] filed a deletion request for e2studio [2]: This PKGBUILD is beyond problematic as it (attempts to) place files in $HOME, modify files belonging to other packages (libpcre) and in the end produces an empty package not tracking any of the files it may have placed in the filesystem. The author has a thread on the forums seeking help. Until that is acheived, this should be removed so no one tries to use it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Trilby/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/e2studio/

2 years, 8 months

[PRQ#45503] Deletion Request for python-fastaq-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python-fastaq-git [2]: Broken VCS package from 2015, with undeclared sources. But even if fixed, this should be submitted under a different name: pyfastaq-git Because pyfastaq is the name of the PyPI/Anaconda package, and this is a CLI application, so no 'python-' prefix required. But as there is no user feedback (0 comments/votes), it seems safe to recommend deleting this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-fastaq-git/

2 years

[PRQ#49051] Deletion Request for bishengjdk-17

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for bishengjdk-17 [2]: This package is not maintained since 2022-08, sets its provides incorrectly, and omits setting its dependencies on system libraries. Additionally, Huawei requires anyone downloading this binary from their hosting servers to agree to a hostile, restrictive nonfree license, in conjunction with using "the Kunpeng DevKit (»DevKit«) on Kunpeng hardware in the People's Republic of China". [a] [a]: https://www.hikunpeng.com/developer/devkit/software/protocol [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bishengjdk-17/

1 year, 9 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"