Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#64328] Deletion Request for hal-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

xiota [1] filed a deletion request for hal-git [2]: Package should be deleted because maintainer MIA, package is unbuildable, and name is confusing. Package can be recreated with a different name when build issues are fixed upstream. Maintainer has not responded to comments since May 2023. At the time, he indicated lack of time/interest to work on package and willingness transfer maintainership to someone else. Package name is confusing. `aur/hal` is a hardware abstraction layer. `aur/hal-git` is a hardware analyzer. Package has been unbuildable since May 2024, requiring upstream and packaging changes. There is a pending upstream PR. After the PR is merged, I plan to recreate this package with a different name. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xiota/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hal-git/

10 months, 3 weeks

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#2830] Deletion Request for loliwm-git

by Stefan Husmann

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 25.03.2015 um 20:38 schrieb notify(a)aur.archlinux.org: > Earnest [1] filed a deletion request for loliwm-git [2]: > > This project has been renamed to orbment, and thus I have uploaded a > new orbment-git package to reflect that. > > Since I have already done that a merge is likely not necessary except > for the comments. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Earnest/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/loliwm-git/ > For a merge it is necessary that the packe to merge to exists. And as you want to keep the comments, a merge request would be the right thing to do. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVExtwAAoJEIT1NQXkgeRl0toQAIaNRb94mhHordOzdG0vdqsR zgZukHS67Y0zfCA9VLTih/3PC6sDjN3EJ1+SfCpglG9JhDAraMKYKE2cslox4oLR bwqJO5mO39rxeU0RQXoyfz+LomszHYMbrvxMo9R7HRRmFzdEyF5GiJEONdGMotai uAE1H+gZVRI2CmzJ4iRY18XdGT6g7ecJTYa32LY1iuFCytpWZPzw63PRbth+lB0Z I/jmEtyFob7uUIIA2wCJmDvz1RSBeC+ibm+8vdDUTX6OaPsj2I2VWuBrLLUFOjBk b1xP+1UiHqhdq+PTLRwx4qfXjIIc7MYEDlW8SunosenkC8vEfYZZDF7PQ2HHQCZG n/0S6l7PKpGkP8fk52jcBm2uATDnblG7fNwbDVIlpw1keByKlWIhDIlK/guiO9Ea 2Yo4PLFUVMACujyp/pj3h4ae0A0Hi+/oLBPLbpUdrBn4UacSqYXtewUBLPKmBK/k +XSckcIM2LTmPmK6znNTu7q8B9yI89ZzJfe7xdbbKyde1uDve+6OMHtS9kVSS4Yy 16smRWXdJqi6XforNtzQkaIz3b07fj/3U/Z+eduYtgY333qxlc1zAAMOGiWcEhdL +h/imOHHLDPeQHbYCzX4BwxEyllf9ao5jyFhOZRsZhjNGN89cPDjYc8+yLXKzYou jxlCSLhX/qfetACPl/aR =UsDl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

10 years, 5 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#5541] Orphan Request for mdm-display-manager

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Sam_Burgos [1] filed a orphan request for mdm-display-manager [2]: The maintainer hasn't even posted an update to it, neither answered some messages, so it should be good to notify to orphan or deletion [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Sam_Burgos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mdm-display-manager/

9 years, 3 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#15060] Orphan Request for vmd

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

a.kudelin [1] filed a orphan request for vmd [2]: As it was suggested by polyzen in #15019, the package is to be orphaned followed by deletion of vmd-src. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a.kudelin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vmd/

6 years, 3 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#26893] Orphan Request for gnome-search-tool-no-nautilus

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

colinkeenan [1] filed an orphan request for gnome-search-tool-no- nautilus [2]: I no longer use this and don't have time to maintain it. Deletion would be fine too. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/colinkeenan/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-search-tool-no-nautilus/

4 years, 2 months

[PRQ#45258] Orphan Request for powersupply

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

muflone [1] filed an orphan request for powersupply [2]: I disagree with the deletion request #45003 as the package could be useful to other people. As the actual maintainer has shown no interest in maintaining it I'm hence filing an orphan request to let other people continue to maintain [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/powersupply/

2 years, 1 month

[PRQ#60961] Orphan Request for protonvpn-cli

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Spixmaster [1] filed an orphan request for protonvpn-cli [2]: NOTE: The deletion request was chosen by accident. The package is outdated with the request being ignored. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Spixmaster/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/protonvpn-cli/

1 year, 2 months

[PRQ#75129] Orphan Request for pixelorama

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

oech3 [1] filed an orphan request for pixelorama [2]: Orphan request [PRQ#74711] by different people about bandwidth issue was accidentaly rejected by misunderstanding that is a invalid deletion request. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/oech3/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pixelorama/

1 month

[PRQ#43400] Deletion Request for electron-xdg

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for electron-xdg [2]: Outdated duplicate of repo 'electron'. @noahvogt, please file your patch as part of a bug / feature request ticket for the repo package. Don't duplicate it on AUR. Also no one apart from me noticed this is out-of-date. As per AUR submission guidelines [a]: "The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the official package database for the package. If any version of it exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of- date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking a feature, then please file a bug report." [a]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/electron-xdg/

2 years, 2 months

[PRQ#59554] Deletion Request for lib32-libdbusmenu-qt

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-libdbusmenu-qt [2]: Broken, unneeded optional package for lib32-qt4. The latter has been failing to build since 2021. This package was only for adding a customization feature, to allow bin32 Qt4 applications to show their menu bars outside of the application's own window and e.g. on a global desktop top bar. But all bin32 Qt4 applications can work just fine without this customization (if lib32-qt4 gets fixed to be buildable and installable, that is). So there is no loss in functionality for anyone if this dead PKGBUILD from 2018 is dropped from AUR. Also there are no longer any bin32 or lib32 packages on AUR that need lib32-qt4 apart from this. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-libdbusmenu-qt/

1 year, 4 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"