Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

Re: [PRQ#49093] Deletion Request for lib32-freetype2-v35

by Marcell Meszaros

As per AUR submission guidelines, please kindly file a bug report instead of duplicating repo libraries. On 16 October 2023 21:41:27 GMT+02:00, Natrio <Natrio(a)list.ru> wrote: >Updated. > >A package from the repository supports v35 by setting an environment variable that can be filtered and ignored by some applications. This has already been written in the comments to the package: > >https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/freetype2-v35#comment-695322 > > >16.10.2023 20:56, marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu : >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-freetype2-v35 [2]: >> >> Unneeded, outdated (v2.13.0 from 2023-03) variant of multilib repo's >> lib32-freetype2 (v2.13.2 from 2023-09). >> >> The repo package also supports the legacy v35 font subpixel hinting. >> >> [1]https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >> [2]https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-freetype2-v35/ >

2 years, 2 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#8874] Deletion Request for firefox-dev

by John D Jones III

On 8/28/17 13:54, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > jnbek [1] filed a deletion request for firefox-dev [2]: > > This package has been a hostile attempt at taking control of the > formerly my firefox-developer PKGBUILD, which is built by strict > standards for Mozilla software. This PKGBUILD autoupdates willy nilly > without any hands on checks to ensure everything went well. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jnbek/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/firefox-dev/ > It's also worth noting that the firefox-dev PKGBUILD was already deleted from the AUR and denvit readded it anyways. -- Thanks, John D Jones III UNIX Zealot; Perl Lover Musician; Hot Spouse unixgeek1972(a)gmail.com jnbek1972(a)gmail.com http://zoelife4u.org/ Turning ashes to flesh Turning ice to rivers Turning decay to blossom To the surface we rise All within the infant's first breath Where Earth And Spirit Unite (Grutle Kjellson / Friedrich W J Schelling)

8 years, 3 months

Re: Aur-requests Digest, Vol 13, Issue 98

by Fauzan xxx

UnSub Pada tanggal Jum, 15 Sep 2023 17.19, < aur-requests-request(a)lists.archlinux.org> menulis: > Send Aur-requests mailing list submissions to > aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or > body 'help' to > aur-requests-request(a)lists.archlinux.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > aur-requests-owner(a)lists.archlinux.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Aur-requests digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. [PRQ#47312] Orphan Request for godot-mono-git > (notify(a)aur.archlinux.org) > 2. [PRQ#47313] Deletion Request for protobuf2-c > (notify(a)aur.archlinux.org) > 3. [PRQ#46795] Deletion Request for niacop-git Accepted > (notify(a)aur.archlinux.org) > 4. [PRQ#46800] Merge Request for libfprint-tudor Accepted > (notify(a)aur.archlinux.org) > 5. [PRQ#46810] Deletion Request for amgx Accepted > (notify(a)aur.archlinux.org) > 6. [PRQ#46811] Merge Request for opentrace Accepted > (notify(a)aur.archlinux.org) > 7. [PRQ#47314] Deletion Request for tenshi-rs > (notify(a)aur.archlinux.org) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:53:34 +0000 > From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > Subject: [PRQ#47312] Orphan Request for godot-mono-git > To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > Cc: fabio.loli(a)disroot.org, tasgon_(a)outlook.com > Message-ID: <pkg-request-47312(a)aur.archlinux.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > FabioLolix [1] filed an orphan request for godot-mono-git [2]: > > Need a good revision as mentioned in comments and OOD flag, flagged > OOD for 1+ year > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/godot-mono-git/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:55:43 +0000 > From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > Subject: [PRQ#47313] Deletion Request for protobuf2-c > To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > Cc: davvore33(a)gmail.com, marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu > Message-ID: <pkg-request-47313(a)aur.archlinux.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for protobuf2-c [2]: > > Abandoned, broken PKGBUILD from 2018. > Missing a dependency, source 404. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/protobuf2-c/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:55:52 +0000 > From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > Subject: [PRQ#46795] Deletion Request for niacop-git Accepted > To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > Message-ID: <20230915095552.4DBF75AF9EB8(a)aur.archlinux.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Request #46795 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: > > [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for niacop-git. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:03:45 +0000 > From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > Subject: [PRQ#46800] Merge Request for libfprint-tudor Accepted > To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > Cc: 27stopittj(a)gmail.com > Message-ID: <20230915100345.0C3975AF9FD9(a)aur.archlinux.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Request #46800 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: > > [Autogenerated] Accepted merge for libfprint-tudor into > libfprint-2-tod1-synatudor-git. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:06:41 +0000 > From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > Subject: [PRQ#46810] Deletion Request for amgx Accepted > To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > Message-ID: <20230915100641.422FA5AFA03C(a)aur.archlinux.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Request #46810 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: > > [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for amgx. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:07:11 +0000 > From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > Subject: [PRQ#46811] Merge Request for opentrace Accepted > To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > Cc: archlinux-archeb(a)gfw.moe > Message-ID: <20230915100711.01B0B5AFA049(a)aur.archlinux.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Request #46811 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: > > [Autogenerated] Accepted merge for opentrace into opentrace-bin. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 10:19:04 +0000 > From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org > Subject: [PRQ#47314] Deletion Request for tenshi-rs > To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > Cc: marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu > Message-ID: <pkg-request-47314(a)aur.archlinux.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for tenshi-rs [2]: > > Abandoned build from 2019. > Source and upstream not found (404). > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tenshi-rs/ > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > Aur-requests mailing list -- aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org > To unsubscribe send an email to aur-requests-leave(a)lists.archlinux.org > > > ------------------------------ > > End of Aur-requests Digest, Vol 13, Issue 98 > ******************************************** >

2 years, 3 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#4831] Deletion Request for grass7

by Maciej Sieczka

W dniu 16.02.2016 o 04:08, Doug Newgard pisze: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 21:04:34 +0100 Maciej Sieczka > <msieczka(a)sieczka.org> wrote: > >> This is not a duplicate. I can rename it if that helps. >> >> W dniu 15.02.2016 o 20:18, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org pisze: >>> Scimmia [1] filed a deletion request for grass7 [2]: >>> >>> Duplicate of grass package >>> >>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Scimmia/ [2] >>> https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/grass7/ > One or two different configure options doesn't justify a separate > package. > > And please don't top post. Glad that you reminded me about it. It is an important thing to have things in order. Dear AUR maintainers, What is your call? I don't want it to go and see no reason for it. Let me know your preffered name to distinguish it from Doug's package. Maciek

9 years, 10 months

Re: [PRQ#63649] Deletion Request for ffnvcodec-headers-12-1

by Benjamin Klettbach

Hello, I am sorry, I waited for an update of the package and after I saw it got deleted, I saw the opportunity to fix the package by specifying the version in the provides. I saw also, the package ffnvcodec-headers-11-1 still existsand thought the package was only deleted because it wasn't updated and out of date dir a long time. I will probably update obs-studio-git soon, if it works with the new version of ffnvcodec-headers. Kind regards, Benjamin Mit freundlichen Grüßen Benjamin Klettbach <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> schrieb am Do., 5. Sept. 2024, 22:01: > xiota [1] filed a deletion request for ffnvcodec-headers-12-1 [2]: > > Recently deleted package. Rather than restore this package, > maintainer should update obs-studio-git to use extra/ffnvcodec- > headers. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xiota/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ffnvcodec-headers-12-1/

1 year, 3 months

Re: [PRQ#41201] Deletion Request for python2-langid

by Marcell Meszaros

There's been no response to this request by anyone in 45 days. Like I've said, a Python 3 based continuation fork exists, so there's no reason to keep this Py2 variant around if no one uses it and nothing depends on it. On 28 April 2023 22:58:56 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python2-langid [2]: > >This Python 2 library has been out of development since 2017. [a] > >The project's last release was in 2016 [b]. > >There is a separately maintained Python 3 compatible fork on PyPI, >called py3langid. [c] > >It's better to delete this package. Nothing depends on it on AUR. > > >[a]: https://github.com/saffsd/langid.py >[b]: https://pypi.org/project/langid/ >[c]: https://pypi.org/project/py3langid/ > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-langid/

2 years, 6 months

[PRQ#49327] Deletion Request for qt5-sensors-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for qt5-sensors-git [2]: Not useful to keep this package. Qt5 is EOL since May 2023. This PKGBUILD currently builds from upstream's dev branch for Qt6, and has a pkgver() that does not properly guarantee monotonic increase. But it's pointless to fix this. Qt Group's public Qt5 branch is typically behind the source used by the stable PKGBUILD in extra repo, because Qt devs delay pushing Qt5 patches by one year, whereas the KDE project cherry-picks and backports most of the patches accepted for Qt5 but not yet publicly pushed by Qt Group. Therefore the extra repo build is better for users to use, because it is based on newer code which has less bugs. And because of all this, the extra/qt5* packages are quite like git VCS packages. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qt5-sensors-git/

2 years, 2 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35800] Deletion Request for cutecoin-git

by Marcell Meszaros

# Note: resending to aur-requests as previously I was not subscribed. Project has also been renamed to sakia, so that is another reason for deleting this. After the last commit 18 months ago (Jan 2021), the main repo has added the designation: "[UNMAINTAINED]" [a] I think that is pretty much convincing in favor of deletion. [a]: https://git.duniter.org/clients/python/sakia On 23 June 2022 21:57:37 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for cutecoin-git [2]: > >This VCS package seems unmaintained; last updated in 2015. > >The GitHub mirror it links to stopped being updated in 2018. > >There is a main Gitlab repo; but development there also >stopped 18 months ago (Jan 2021). > >So I recommend deleting this package. Seems no one used >it the last few years. There are no comments or votes. > >Nothing depends on it so it's safe to remove from AUR. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cutecoin-git/

3 years, 5 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#32739] Deletion Request for virtualdub

by sL1pKn07 SpinFlo

El mar, 22 feb 2022 a las 23:16, notify--- via aur-requests (< aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org>) escribió: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for virtualdub [2]: > > Orphaned package. Freeware Windows video editor application last > updated in 2014. Package links to 32-bit binary. There are no user > comments. I suggest this package can be deleted, no impact, nothing > depends on it. > > There is a Linux-native clone which is provides the same baseline > features and is continually being developed and improved: > > Avidemux: > https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/avidemux-qt/ > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-qt5-git > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/avidemux-qt6-git > > And of course there are several high quality alternatives for Linux > now, both for casual video editing (Shotcut, Openshot, Pitivi, > Handbrake) as well as professional workflows (KDEnlive, Flowblade). > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/virtualdub/ Hi well, exist virtualdub2, and is still in development https://sourceforge.net/projects/vdfiltermod/ greetings

3 years, 9 months

Re: [PRQ#59553] Deletion Request for lib32-libdbusmenu-qt

by Konstantin P.

Why you think than it should not be in AUR? If maintainer want to maintain it, why not? On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 3:32 PM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-libdbusmenu-qt [2]: > > Broken, unneeded optional package for lib32-qt4. > > The latter has been failing to build since 2021. > > This package was only for adding a customization feature, to allow > showing application menu bars outside of the application's own window > and e.g. on a global desktop top bar. > > But all applications can work just fine without this customization > (they can show their menus inside the app window). > So there is no loss in functionality for anyone if this dead package > is dropped from AUR. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-libdbusmenu-qt/

1 year, 7 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"