Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

Re: [PRQ#52874] Deletion Request for global-appmenu-applet-whose-menu-mnemonic-has-been-disabled-git

by Marcell Meszaros

On 9 January 2024 19:17:22 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for global-appmenu-applet-whose- >menu-mnemonic-has-been-disabled-git [2]: > >Broken, unmaintained, unneeded package. > >Also, a package name has to be reasonably short, and not consist of a >whole extended sentence. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/global-appmenu-applet-whose-menu-mnemonic… Submitter has disowned this package - thank you! It is incompatible with KDE Plasma 6. (Its upstream is EOL for 2 years.) Meanwhile I've also realized that this codebase is superfluous, as it just implements the same menu API's that an already existing built-in KDE Plasma element does, called Global Menu. (Which I use on my KDE desktop to show the top menu bar of applications.)

1 year, 8 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#31738] Orphan Request for libx32-glibc

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for libx32-glibc [2]: Please delete all wrongly named libx32- named packages, all of which are abandoned for 6 years or more, and all of which are for special architecture X32 which is not enabled in mainstream Linux kernels, not even in Arch kernels. Owner wrote email to me for my earlier deletion request, expressing his agreement that these packages should be deleted. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libx32-glibc/

3 years, 10 months

[PRQ#58672] Deletion Request for at32-ide-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

a937983423 [1] filed a deletion request for at32-ide-bin [2]: : Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/scripts/target/1986º╙º╓1ºΣ.cfg' to UTF-8: Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/scripts/target/1986ве1т.cfg' to UTF-8: Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/scripts/target/º▄1879xº╥1º±.cfg' to UTF-8: Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/scripts/target/к1879xб1я.cfg' to UTF-8: Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/share/openocd/scripts/target/1986º╙º╓1ºΣ.cfg' to UTF-8: Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/share/openocd/scripts/target/1986ве1т.cfg' to UTF-8: Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/share/openocd/scripts/target/º▄1879xº╥1º±.cfg' to UTF-8: Can't translate pathname 'opt/artery32/at32-ide/OpenOCD/share/openocd/scripts/target/к1879xб1я.cfg' to UTF-8 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a937983423/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/at32-ide-bin/

1 year, 8 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#35296] Merge Request for glide-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge glide-bin [2] into golang-glide- bin [3]: I wanted to initiate a rename but maintainer @tongpu cut my initiative short by submitting a deletion request before coming to any mutual agreement. This package, under the new name, is temporarily useful to keep, until two AUR packages are either migrated to new Go module management or are deleted. Also, my discussion in comments with @tongpu is, I think, would be beneficial for that interim period for others to see on the new golang-glide-bin page, because it sheds light to the background of the name change and the problem that prompted this kind of solution. You can of course choose to just delete the legacy and now-problematically named 'glide-bin', but I would welcome a merge instead to target package, to keep the information for whomever still needs to use this tool temporarily (until they can migrate away from it). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/glide-bin/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/golang-glide-bin/

3 years, 6 months

[PRQ#74911] Deletion Request for kumono-bin

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

AlphaLynx [1] filed a deletion request for kumono-bin [2]: The sole purpose of this package is illegal piracy. This package is a downloader for content from coomer.st and kemono.cr, sites that host NSFW paid content from onlyfans, fansly, patreon, etc. (see r/piracy [0] & [1]) I'm not sure whether this is allowed because the AUR submission guidelines don't explicitly say illegal or piracy packages should not be uploaded. But, the code of conduct [2] prohibits "criminal solicitation" and numerous piracy packages have been deleted previously (e.g., PRQ#65330, PRQ#74391, PRQ#25316). So, given that, I think these packages should be deleted. The guidelines should probably be more explicit in prohibiting illegal/piracy packages. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/15v3szz/coomerparty_downloader/ [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/10pu5dk/is_there_a_site_like_kemon… [2] https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/#criminal- solicitation [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/AlphaLynx/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kumono-bin/

4 months, 3 weeks

[PRQ#74913] Deletion Request for kumono-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

AlphaLynx [1] filed a deletion request for kumono-git [2]: The sole purpose of this package is illegal piracy. This package is a downloader for content from coomer.st and kemono.cr, sites that host NSFW paid content from onlyfans, fansly, patreon, etc. (see r/piracy [0] & [1]) I'm not sure whether this is allowed because the AUR submission guidelines don't explicitly say illegal or piracy packages should not be uploaded. But, the code of conduct [2] prohibits "criminal solicitation" and numerous piracy packages have been deleted previously (e.g., PRQ#65330, PRQ#74391, PRQ#25316). So, given that, I think these packages should be deleted. The guidelines should probably be more explicit in prohibiting illegal/piracy packages. [0] https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/15v3szz/coomerparty_downloader/ [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/Piracy/comments/10pu5dk/is_there_a_site_like_kemon… [2] https://terms.archlinux.org/docs/code-of-conduct/#criminal- solicitation [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/AlphaLynx/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kumono-git/

4 months, 3 weeks

[PRQ#59779] Deletion Request for ffmpeg-nocuda

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ffmpeg-nocuda [2]: Unbuildable duplicate build of Arch/extra/ffmpeg (though newer version.) This is the 2nd resubmit of this package after it was already deleted once. [a] Maintainer @eggz does not properly test their pushed packages, and defiantly resubmits the ones that get deleted, even if for valid reasons. Arch repo's ffmpeg also builds without cuda support, so there is no benefit in keeping a '-nocuda' pkg. See other instances of defiance: - 3rd resubmit of the one-line modded pikaur-aurnews, disguised VCS package, [b] [c] - 2nd resubmit of the never-buildable mate-wayland-session-git. [d] [e] [a]: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests(a)lists.archlinux.org/thread/NVZTMTOTO3RELF75PW5MQ4HE4PEKBRIQ [b]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pikaur-aurnews [c]: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/search?q=pikaur- aurnews&mlist=aur-requests%40lists.archlinux.org&sort=date-desc [d]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mate-wayland-session-git [e]: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/search?q=mate-wayland-session- git&mlist=aur-requests%40lists.archlinux.org&sort=date-desc [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ffmpeg-nocuda/

1 year, 7 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#1607] Deletion Request for firefox-kde

by Tomasz Przybył

This is based on PKGBUILDs from: https://github.com/firefox-kde/ And including packages for language packs in separated packages. I made only some improvement in PKGBUILD code (in PKGBUILD for langpacks I used sha256sums instead md5sums, improved description). This version is another than firefox-kde-opensuse. Some patches are missing in this version and THIS is not the same as firefox-kde-opensuse. Compare tarball with SRC files and list of: https://github.com/firefox-kde/firefox-kde-manjaro/tree/master/firefox-kde with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-kde-opensuse/ and https://github.com/firefox-kde/firefox-kde-manjaro/tree/master/firefox-kde-… In default firefox-kde-opensuse include only english gui and it is not providing lang packs. Please DON'T delete firefox-kde package. Regards W dniu 06.12.2014 o 15:33, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org pisze: > sir_lucjan [1] filed a deletion request for firefox-kde [2]: > > The same version > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-kde-opensuse/ > > [1]https://aur.archlinux.org//account/sir_lucjan/ > [2]https://aur.archlinux.org//pkgbase/firefox-kde/

11 years

Re: [PRQ#43420] Deletion Request for trinnity-git

by Marcell Meszaros

AUR still has the latest version in a stable package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/trinnity That one at least does not have a problem with pkgver, contrary to this -git package. On 2 July 2023 21:37:21 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for trinnity-git [2]: > >Development on this mathematics research code seems to have been >discontinued since 2020. [a] > >Maintainer seems to be MIA since same year. > >Also this is badly packaged: no pkgver() function. > >But no one noticed. Package last updated in 2019. > >No comments, apart from my fresh one about the openblas packaging >change. > >0 votes. > >I think it's best to delete this. > >[a]: >https://bitbucket.org/STG-TCD/trinnity/commits/ > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/trinnity-git/

2 years, 5 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#25504] Deletion Request for pacman-hooks-strykar

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

diabonas [1] filed a deletion request for pacman-hooks-strykar [2]: This PKGBUILD is still in grave violation of the AUR submission guidelines [1], none of the issues mentioned in the last deletion request PRQ#25498 [2] have been addressed. This is still a personal pacman hook without any documentation, which still does not even work as pointed out in the previous request. It therefore does not fulfil "Make sure the package you want to upload is useful." You only changed $pkgver, which does not achieve anything since it will be overwritten by the pkgver() function anyway, and didn't change the upstream repository either. Don't upload this PKGBUILD to the AUR again unless you are absolutely sure that you have fixed the issue and created a package that is useful to more people than yourself! Post it for review on the aur- general mailing list or in the #archlinux-aur IRC channel first. If you continue reuploading this broken package, I will suspend your account. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines [2] https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2021-May/053067.html [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/diabonas/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pacman-hooks-strykar/

4 years, 7 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"