Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

Re: [PRQ#47432] Deletion Request for mpv-build-git

by sL1pKn07 SpinFlo

El dom, 17 sept 2023 a las 18:07, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> escribió: > mackel [1] filed a deletion request for mpv-build-git [2]: > > I remove the patch and build file works fine.So I think it is no need > to add in PKGBUILD file. > But when I use PKG included patch,the file doesn't work. > > ``` > patching file libavformat/vapoursynth.c > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n > Apply anyway? [n] n > Skipping patch. > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file > libavformat/vapoursynth.c.rej > ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare(). > Aborting... > error: failed to build 'mpv-build-git-0.36.0.274.gbe92223157-1': > error: packages failed to build: mpv-build- > git-0.36.0.274.gbe92223157-1 > ``` > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mackel/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mpv-build-git/ ops. i forget do push. done

2 years, 3 months

Re: [PRQ#51957] Deletion Request for dolphin-meld

by Andy Kluger

Hi, I'm maintaining this. I don't feel strongly about keeping it, but FWIW: 1. it regularly gets out-of-date notifications when dolphin is updated, indicating there are users who find it useful 2. the main benefit is to get the toolbar button, which is hardcoded to use a specific external diff tool, to work with meld instead (this cannot be addressed by a service menu addon, AFAIK) 3. broken? On Sun, Dec 3, 2023 at 2:42 PM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for dolphin-meld [2]: > > Unneeded, broken minimally modded Dolphin, which is maintained in > [extra] repo. > > There exists a minimal Dolphin service menu addon, installable without > root, to let users easily invoke Meld from Dolphin - as pointed out by > @malcolm in a comment made on 2020-09-30. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dolphin-meld/

2 years

Re: [PRQ#53053] Deletion Request for otf-commit-mono

by Marcell Meszaros

On 17 January 2024 17:00:57 GMT+01:00, Marcell Meszaros <marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu> wrote: >Also, the currently existing and maintained 'otf-commit-mono' has a pkgname that aligns properly with Arch font package naming conventions. Please kindly read the following ArchWiki article for further reference: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Font_package_guidelines On 17 January 2024 17:00:57 GMT+01:00, Marcell Meszaros <marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu> wrote: >>mhdi [1] filed a deletion request for otf-commit-mono [2]: >> >>'commit-mono-font' will provide 'otf-commit-mono'. > >-1: This should not be deleted. > >There is no 'commit-mono-font' package in either Arch OR AUR repos. > >Also, the currently existing and maintained 'otf-commit-mono' has a pkgname that aligns properly with Arch font package naming conventions. > >Please kindly revoke / close / reject this request. >Thank you for your understanding and cooperation. > >On 17 January 2024 16:43:01 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>mhdi [1] filed a deletion request for otf-commit-mono [2]: >> >>'commit-mono-font' will provide 'otf-commit-mono'. >> >>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mhdi/ >>[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/otf-commit-mono/

1 year, 11 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#29683] Deletion Request for ros-indigo-freenect-camera

by zoorat

hello Christopher, thanks for mailing me. sorry I'm interested in robotics but I'm dont have time... or any need of those packages... I'm flagging those packages because those are broken(you will find the reasons in deletion request), I'm just trying to help to keep AUR clean. If you think I'm wrong flagging those please tell me, that will be awesome. maybe, you already know but telling you again "ROS Indigo Igloo" 's end of life was on April, 2019... yours, zoorat. ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Thursday, November 25th, 2021 at 13:41, Christopher <christopher.andronikos(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Zoorat, > > Do you have an interest in robotics? How about we discuss the maintenance of these packages. > > Regards, > Chris > > On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 16:20, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > >> zoorat [1] filed a deletion request for ros-indigo-freenect-camera >> [2]: >> >> Maintainer: candronikos >> Broken Dependency: ros-indigo-libfreenect >> Last Modified: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:17:45 GMT >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zoorat/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ros-indigo-freenect-camera/

4 years

[PRQ#44309] Deletion Request for sdl2-nox

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for sdl2-nox [2]: Orphan, outdated package, last changed a year ago. Last comment is from 2018. I recommend deletion. Not just because of its maintenence status. But also because of the fact that in this day and age, "nox" designation is misleading. It was meant to mean "no X(.org server)", but was synonymous to "headless", a.k.a. "no GUI". However, nowadays there is Wayland, so "no X" could also mean "Wayland-only". One can only guess, based on build configuration parameters, that this is headless. However, this is not truly "no X" in the sense that it depends on mesa, which uses libx11 client-side libraries (there is no "mesa- nox"). Also, I'm not sure how SDL2 can be useful without GUI support, as this is meant for audiovisual applications (games and other multimedia programs). (Maybe automated testing purposes?) In any case, no package specifically depends on it, except for the long-abandoned and broken ffmpeg-nox-git from 2021, which I've submitted for deletion (PRQ#43348) on 2023-07-01. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sdl2-nox/

2 years, 5 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#27597] Deletion Request for i3blocks-contrib-install-git

by S Shaikh

Hi, I have replied to the comment on the AUR page with the reasons why this package was created. Rather than copy it here, here's a direct link to that reply: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/i3blocks-contrib-install-git/#comment-82… It's been suggested that I adopt and update the existing package which I'm happy to do, but as that would break the package for existing users guidance is required on the correct approach to take. Thanks, Shak ________________________________ From: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 3:05:10 AM To: aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org <aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org> Cc: tbperrotta(a)gmail.com <tbperrotta(a)gmail.com>; sshaikh(a)hotmail.com <sshaikh(a)hotmail.com> Subject: [PRQ#27597] Deletion Request for i3blocks-contrib-install-git thiagowfx [1] filed a deletion request for i3blocks-contrib-install- git [2]: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines: > Check the AUR if the package already exists. If it is currently maintained, changes can be submitted in a comment for the maintainer's attention. If it is unmaintained or the maintainer is unresponsive, the package can be adopted and updated as required. Do not create duplicate packages. How is this package different from i3blocks-contrib-git? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/thiagowfx/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/i3blocks-contrib-install-git/

4 years, 4 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#12547] Orphan Request for rcm-git

by Felixoid

I would like to kindly remind about this request because the same about non-git version https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rcm/ was accepted. Best regards, Mikhail. чт, 30 авг. 2018 г. в 10:00, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org>: > Felixoid [1] filed a orphan request for rcm-git [2]: > > Looks like the author isn't active for more than a year. I would like > to maintain this package > > **** deletion request was wrong > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Felixoid/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rcm-git/

7 years, 3 months

Re: [PRQ#42182] Deletion Request for sirius-git

by Marcell Meszaros

Simon, maybe it's better if you just orphan this package for now. I don't need it, but someone might want to take over maintenance. Especially because the SIRIUS project's main Readme file links to this AUR package, suggesting it to Arch users. It does not actually harm anyone if a package is left orphaned on AUR. It is flagged out-of-date for needing maintenence. That might be a call to action for someone to adopt it. On 15 June 2023 14:19:31 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >simonp [1] filed a deletion request for sirius-git [2]: > >I'm the author of this PKGBUILD and one of the developers of the code. >I'd like to delete this package. It's outdated, and due to the amount >of possible installation options, it is much better to use >https://github.com/spack/spack to install it. > > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/simonp/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sirius-git/

2 years, 6 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#11784] Deletion Request for minecraft

by Christophe Robin

Ok, 2 things: 1. The URL on the official website, today, still points to http://s3.amazonaws.com/Minecraft.Download/launcher/Minecraft.jar , if the new launcher is the "official" one why are they not updating that link? This package will continue to point to this URL 2. The tweet mentioned do not talk about the download link, but about the version file and my package already points to the link requested by Dinnerbone: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/minecraft?h=minecraft#n11 Please stop making those flagging and requests, thank you. Christophe Robin *Independent Contractor* *IT Consulting* *Nekoo K.K.* On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 7:16 AM, <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > mkolassa [1] filed a deletion request for minecraft [2]: > > While I understand that this package was created first (by several > years), it has not been updated to use the new version or even the new > path mentioned by the developer > (https://twitter.com/Dinnerbone/status/981978843178323968) even after > several comments from users. Because of this, I would like to flag > this for deletion in lieu of minecraft-launcher > (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minecraft-launcher) > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mkolassa/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/minecraft/ >

7 years, 6 months

Re: [PRQ#69709] Deletion Request for kochmorse-py

by nmlibertarian＠gmail.com

- EOL doesn't mean it is too old - See comments by myself and MarsSeed re: 1- when (hasn't been a year) and 2- specious as, at the time, as it still installed a.o.k. - Finally; I am working towards a solution which should be forthcoming very soon. PLEASE give me some more time to work this out. very best regards - not_anonymous On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:01 AM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for kochmorse-py [2]: > > Fails to build since a year ago (Python 3.12). > EOL since 2014. [a] > > Seems unused. > Votes: 1 > Popularity: 0.000000 > Reverse dependencies: 0 > > Only maintainer and I left comments (in 2024). > > Enough to keep the newer, C++ based AUR/kochmorse. > > [a]: https://pypi.org/project/KochMorse > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kochmorse-py/

9 months, 4 weeks

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"