Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

Re: [PRQ#61132] Deletion Request for android-studio

by Robin Candau

On 6/30/24 9:35 AM, Julian Raufelder wrote: > Hey all, > Hi! > As Co-Maintainer of android-studio (SailReal), I have no idea why this > user created a deletion request for > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-studio while pasting in this > request a log of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/android-studio-canary? > > Please reject it. > Done, thanks for the heads up :) > All the best > Julian > > On 27/06/2024 17:32, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> a937983423 [1] filed a deletion request for android-studio [2]: >> >> android-studio-canary >> [0.016s][warning][cds] Archived non-system classes are disabled >> because the java.system.class.loader property is specified (value = >> "com.intellij.util.lang.PathClassLoader"). To use archived non-system >> classes, this property must not be set >> CompileCommand: exclude >> com/intellij/openapi/vfs/impl/FilePartNodeRoot.trieDescend bool >> exclude = true >> [0.081s][error ][jfr,startup] >> /usr/lib/jvm/java-22-openjdk/lib/libnio.so: >> /usr/lib/jvm/java-22-openjdk/lib/libnio.so: undefined symbol: >> reuseport_available >> java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: >> /usr/lib/jvm/java-22-openjdk/lib/libnio.so: >> /usr/lib/jvm/java-22-openjdk/lib/libnio.so: undefined symbol: >> reuseport_available >> Error occurred during initialization of VM >> Failure when starting JFR on_create_vm_2 >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a937983423/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/android-studio/ -- Regards, Robin Candau / Antiz

1 year, 5 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36222] Deletion Request for dgengine-physfs-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for dgengine-physfs-git [2]: Orphaned package, last updated in 2018. GitHub repo archived sometime after Jan 2021. [a] Package name is misleading: this is a physfs mod, not dgenine. Source was forked from physfs in 2016. Its aim was to embed MPQ support (Blizzard's game data format) via StormLib (by copying its source to this repo). [b] This was intended to be used by DGEngine, a Diablo Engine remake. But this separate library is not needed, because since at least May 2021, DGEngine includes its own PhysFs wrapper for StormLib, and it can use an external (system-installed) StormLib as well. [c] The build requires the unmodified upstream PhysFs as the basis for its customized add-on. [d] Nothing on AUR depends specifically on this deprecated fork, so it's safe to delete. (physfs is available in repo, stormlib is in AUR. Currently there is no dgengine in Arch/AUR. But if someone wanted to create such a package, they would not need this one.) [a] https://github.com/dgcor/physfs [b] https://github.com/dgcor/physfs/commits/master/src/StormLib [c] https://github.com/dgcor/DGEngine/blame/master/CMakeLists.txt#L22-L24 [d] https://github.com/dgcor/DGEngine/blame/master/CMakeLists.txt#L30 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dgengine-physfs-git/

3 years, 5 months

Re: [PRQ#66320] Merge Request for diablo-project-manager

by Marcell Meszaros

On 28 November 2024 19:18:55 GMT+01:00, Fabio Loli <fabio.loli(a)disroot.org> wrote: >Il 22/11/24 22:36, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org ha scritto: >> MarsSeed [1] filed a request to merge diablo-project-manager [2] into >> diablo-project-manager-git [3]: >> >> Duplicate packages. Both are VCS builds, using a git repo's branch. >> The '-git' pkgname suffix is mandatory for such packages. >> >> Please familiarize yourself with the AUR submission guidelines [a] and >> the VCS package guidelines [b]. >> >> [a]: >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines >> [b]: >> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/VCS_package_guidelines >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/diablo-project-manager/ >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/diablo-project-manager-git/ > >Since user taskforce (Talon) is both new, upstream developer and a fixed >releases exists you can give more guidance instead of jumping to merge >and deletion requests > >Since yesterday it build a fixed release I see now that you are right in your advice, @FabioLolix. Thank you for your feedback on this. I will close this request shortly, as I see now that the stable PKGBUILD has been corrected. And also just recently, upsteam has introduced tagged releases.

1 year

Re: [PRQ#53359] Deletion Request for python2-pickleshare

by Marcell Meszaros

On 28 January 2024 11:41:12 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python2-pickleshare [2]: > >This has already been deleted in response to PRQ#48172 (2023-09-29) >[a]. > >Now it got recreated dead-on-arrival, without declaring a needed >dependency. > >The submitter, Pellegrino Prevete (dual aliases on AUR: @tallero, >@truocolo) was MIA for almost the entire year of 2023, but when he's >back, he typically pushes broken packages and broken updates. > >As reverse dependency ipython2 has been dead on AUR since 2021, and >got deleted already once, it does not make sense to keep this package. > >ipython2 has been recreated DOA in 2023-07 and no user commented on it >all throughout the year. > >As per AUR submission guidelines, packages kept here should be in >demand by more than a few users. These builds clearly don't hit that >particular bar. > >[a]: >http://tinyurl.com/aurPRQ48172 >/ Full URL: >https://lists.archlinux.org/hyperkitty/list/aur- >requests(a)lists.archlinux.org/thread/Y7DAICBJLKIETRXVW4RRD5O6MFHSUULX > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-pickleshare/ FYI @Muflone, this is also a defiant resubmit of a broken package.

1 year, 9 months

Re: [PRQ#48343] Deletion Request for perl-test-more-git

by Marcell Meszaros

Scratch that, this is actually using Perl Test::Simple's source repo, which confusingly calls itself test-more. Still, this AUR package is named wrongly and has its provides and conflicts wrong, so it clashes with repo's perl-test-simple. Also it is defunct since 2022-03 because of using unsupported URL protocol for GitHub. On 5 October 2023 02:10:19 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros <marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu> wrote: >Turns out that this package is actually a hostile fork of Perl Test-Simple. [a] > >It conflicts with the repo package [b], without declaring such. > >The project readme calls this "Test2 framework", but internally it uses Test-Simple's pod names. But it is not API-comlatible with the latter. > >Best to delete this package for such a bogus source. > >[a]: https://metacpan.org/dist/Test-Simple >[b]: https://archlinux.org/packages/?q=perl-test-simple > >On 2 October 2023 01:52:00 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >>MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for perl-test-more-git [2]: >> >>Broken, unused VCS package from 2017. >> >>[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >>[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/perl-test-more-git/

2 years, 2 months

Re: [PRQ#43405] Deletion Request for electron-xdg-bin

by Scarlett Haxie

Marcel, The XDG configuration (moving the .pki folder) is not a standard thing and is not a "bug" or a feature request the main repo packages would change, as it's non-standard. As a result, this is not a duplicate of the repo's electron package, nor are any of the others you flagged in the past 15 minutes, Please kindly revoke your deletion requests. Scarlett. On 02/07/2023 15:14, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for electron-xdg-bin [2]: > > Duplicate of repo 'electron', pkg owner's build. > > @noahvogt, please file your xdg configuration patch as part of a bug / > feature request ticket for the repo package. Don't duplicate it on > AUR. > > Also no one flagged this as out-of-date, nor mentioned it. > > As per AUR submission guidelines [a]: > > "The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of > the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the > official package database for the package. If any version of it > exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of- > date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking > a feature, then please file a bug report." > > [a]: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/electron-xdg-bin/

2 years, 5 months

Re: [PRQ#42444] Deletion Request for element-web-bin

by Marcell Meszaros

@Максим, I suggest you resubmit your the upstream-build of element-web to AUR under the following name: element-web-anyarch-bin And add to the description something about it being "for any architecture". On 21 June 2023 03:38:51 GMT+02:00, Marcell Meszaros <marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu> wrote: >I have submitted the following ticket on Arch bug tracker, requesting [extra] element-web package to be correctly declared as an arch=any package: > >https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78849?project=1&string=element-web > >On 21 June 2023 02:31:06 GMT+02:00, "Максим" <asusx2(a)mail.ru> wrote: >>That was not a duplicate, that was a ready binary package from Github, at least for Arch Linux ARM, where there isn't element-web package at all! Why should I build FULL package to have web package, when I can pack binary from developers and install it? >> >>21 июн. 2023 г. 00:56:06 notify(a)aur.archlinux.org: >> >>> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for element-web-bin [2]: >>> >>> Unneded duplicate of [extra] repo package: >>> >>> https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/element-web/ >>> >>> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >>> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/element-web-bin/

2 years, 5 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#5124] Deletion Request for atom-editor

by Doug Newgard

On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 11:44:01 +0200 Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen <archlinux(a)freso.dk> wrote: > Den 02-04-2016 kl. 10:28 skrev Doug Newgard: > > On Sat, 2 Apr 2016 07:55:20 +0000 (UTC) > > notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: > > > >> Freso [1] filed a deletion request for atom-editor [2]: > >> > >> PKGBUILD creates files in $HOME. Request as per discussion in > >> https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- > >> general/2016-March/032195.html thread. > >> > >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso/ > >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/atom-editor/ > > > > 1) No, it does not. > > But it does. > > Before makepkg'ing package: > freso@koume> ls -Ald $HOME/.atom* > drwxr-xr-x 8 freso freso 4096 2 apr 09:56 /home/freso/.atom.bak > > After makepkg'ing package: > freso@koume> ls -Ald $HOME/.atom* > drwxr-xr-x 6 freso freso 4096 2 apr 11:42 /home/freso/.atom > drwxr-xr-x 8 freso freso 4096 2 apr 09:56 /home/freso/.atom.bak > The build system creating files during build is a completely different issue. Or rather, a completely different non-issue. There are no files in $HOME in the package and nothing in the .install scriptlets.

9 years, 8 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#33511] Deletion Request for firefox-beta

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for firefox-beta [2]: Duplicates Arch/community/firefox-developer-edition. Yes, Firefox Developer Edition is Firefox Beta, with minimal differences: * dark theme by default (can be changed) * a few extra toolbar buttons * a separate Firefox profile that doesn't overwrite that of the regular Firefox, so the two can be installed side-by-side. This package is not regularly maintained; last update was on 2021-11-04. This package should conflict with 'firefox', but it doesn't. It shows that the creator/maintainer of this package didn't do their due diligence or was not really aware of the implications of creating this package. There is a good reason why Firefox Developer Edition was the right choice to be added to Arch [community] repo instead of Beta, because the former is the "side-by-side" install of Beta and leaves the user's regular Firefox profile intact. (But the user can import their regular profile to the Developer Edition if they so choose.) All in all this package is not useful to be in AUR and it is not properly configured and not safe wrt default Firefox user profiles. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/firefox-beta/

3 years, 8 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#35222] Deletion Request for bookwyrm-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

m040601 [1] filed a deletion request for bookwyrm-git [2]: PKGBUILD maintainer hasnt been active on AUR since 2018, and hasnt responded to " Flagged out-of-date (2018-12-26) " notice Currently fails with: ``` /usr/include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_vector.h:108:24: error: potential null pointer dereference [-Werror=null-dereference] 108 | { __x._M_start = __x._M_finish = __x._M_end_of_storage = pointer(); } | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_vector.h:108:40: error: potential null pointer dereference [-Werror=null-dereference] 108 | { __x._M_start = __x._M_finish = __x._M_end_of_storage = pointer(); } | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_vector.h:108:64: error: potential null pointer dereference [-Werror=null-dereference] 108 | { __x._M_start = __x._M_finish = __x._M_end_of_storage = pointer(); } | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_vector.h:107:33: error: potential null pointer dereference [-Werror=null-dereference] 107 | _M_end_of_storage(__x._M_end_of_storage) | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_vector.h:106:49: error: potential null pointer dereference [-Werror=null-dereference] 106 | : _M_start(__x._M_start), _M_finish(__x._M_finish), | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~ /usr/include/c++/12.1.0/bits/stl_vector.h:106:24: error: potential null pointer dereference [-Werror=null-dereference] 106 | : _M_start(__x._M_start), _M_finish(__x._M_finish), | ~~~~^~~~~~~~ cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors make[2]: *** [src/core/CMakeFiles/bookwyrm-core.dir/build.make:76: src/core/CMakeFiles/bookwyrm-core.dir/item.cpp.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:396: src/core/CMakeFiles/bookwyrm- core.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:146: all] Error 2 ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... -> error making: bookwyrm-git ``` [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/m040601/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bookwyrm-git/

3 years, 6 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"