Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#26106] Deletion Request for flmusic

by Fabio Loli

Il 29/05/21 18:49, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: > FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for flmusic [2]: > > Source no longer available, reported since 2018-04-25 > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/flmusic/ > Maintainer have rescued the source, this deletion request can be dismissed

4 years, 6 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#31905] Deletion Request for lib32-tesseract

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-tesseract [2]: Can be safely deleted It's only required by the completely broken and unneeded lib32-ffmpeg-semifull-git (deletion request pending), and its also-unneeded dependency, lib32-opencv (deletion request also submitted). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-tesseract/

3 years, 10 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#31906] Deletion Request for lib32-hdf5

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-hdf5 [2]: This package can be safely deleted, as it's only required by the completely broken and unneeded lib32-ffmpeg-semifull-git (deletion request pending), and its also-unneeded dependency, lib32-opencv (deletion request also submitted). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-hdf5/

3 years, 10 months

Re: [PRQ#53054] Deletion Request for otf-commit-mono

by Marcell Meszaros

On 17 January 2024 17:25:41 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >mhdi [1] filed a deletion request for otf-commit-mono [2]: > >The 'commit-mono-font' package base >[https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/commit-mono-font] will provide >packages for both TTF and OTF types. > >I need this package to be deleted to commit an updated version of >PKGBUILD that includes OTF package; otherwise, AUR does not allow me >to proceed. > >Thanks > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mhdi/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/otf-commit-mono/ Hi, @mhdi, Thank you for adding more details about the rationale behind this request. This is now understandable and well-argued for. However, please allow me to add a polite proposal for your kind consideration. Instead of a deletion, I think an AUR merge request would be preferable (from 'otf-commit-mono' to the new pkgbase named 'commit-mono-font'). A merge request would have the same intended effect, allowig you to add 'otf-commit-mono' as a split package (subpackage) under the main 'commit-mono-font'. But the added benefit of a merge would be that it would transfer the votes, and more importantly, the package notification subscriptions from the old, separate 'otf-commit-mono' to the new unified package. I for one, (if I remember correctly), have subscribed to 'otf-commit-mono', to receive notifications about updates and comments. With a merge request instead of deletion, I will continue to receive those notifications for the new package. Thank you for your evaluation of my proposal, and also for maintaining this package. Cheers, Marcell (MarsSeed)

1 year, 11 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#21581] Deletion Request for palemoon

by Doug Newgard

On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 00:41:42 +0000 notify--- via aur-requests <aur-requests(a)archlinux.org> wrote: > pieraper44 [1] filed a deletion request for palemoon [2]: > > doesnt work > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/pieraper44/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/palemoon/ Only because you don't know what you're doing. A deletion request for this is really bad form. Scimmia

5 years, 2 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22793] Deletion Request for webdz-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

admicos [1] filed a deletion request for webdz-git [2]: Upstream repository has been deleted for a while, and I forgot to ask for deletion here before (sorry!) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/admicos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/webdz-git/

4 years, 11 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22794] Deletion Request for userfirefox-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

admicos [1] filed a deletion request for userfirefox-git [2]: Upstream repository has been deleted for a while, and I forgot to ask for deletion here before (sorry!) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/admicos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/userfirefox-git/

4 years, 11 months

[PRQ#60422] Deletion Request for wine-staging-wow64

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

matthewq337 [1] filed a deletion request for wine-staging-wow64 [2]: notify(a)aur.archlinux.org 9:00 PM (10 minutes ago) to aur-requests, yushijun110, matt matthewq337 [1] filed a deletion request for wine-wow64-for-wechat [2]: Wine 9.9[1] supports wow64 now [1]https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/releases/wine-9.9 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/matthewq337/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wine-staging-wow64/

1 year, 7 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#21276] Deletion Request for solarus-git

by Stefan Husmann

notify--- via aur-requests <aur-requests(a)archlinux.org> writes: > franck.stauffer [1] filed a deletion request for solarus-git [2]: > > Dead dependencies > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/franck.stauffer/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/solarus-git/ This is not a reason for deletion, but for fixing of the PKGBUILD.

5 years, 3 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#16497] Merge Request for acquisition-plus

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Morguldir [1] filed a request to merge acquisition-plus [2] into acquisition [3]: acquisition-plus is no longer being updated. Remade as merge request instead of a deletion request, please ignore the previous one. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Morguldir/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/acquisition-plus/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/acquisition/

6 years, 1 month

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"