Search results for "arm" - Aur-requests

Re: [PRQ#42444] Deletion Request for element-web-bin

by Максим

That was not a duplicate, that was a ready binary package from Github, at least for Arch Linux ARM, where there isn't element-web package at all! Why should I build FULL package to have web package, when I can pack binary from developers and install it? 21 июн. 2023 г. 00:56:06 notify(a)aur.archlinux.org: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for element-web-bin [2]: > > Unneded duplicate of [extra] repo package: > > https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/element-web/ > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/element-web-bin/

2 years, 1 month

Re: [PRQ#59191] Deletion Request for widevine Rejected

by Marcell Meszaros

On 28 April 2024 17:29:00 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >Request #59191 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: > >see previous package maintainer answer > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/ @Muflone, what do you mean exactly? The package is not buildable and installable on Arch Linux due to missing a dependency, 'glibc-widevine'. That was an ARM-only older, patched variant of glibc. Also it is not true that this package offers anything useful on Arch Linux. Repo's Chromium and Firefox already has widevine support, and AUR/chromium-widevine offers this runtime for other executables.

1 year, 3 months

[PRQ#64588] Deletion Request for legcord

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

SomeAspy [1] filed a deletion request for legcord [2]: I do not care if this is deleted or orphaned, I just need one of the two to happen. See: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests(a)lists.archlinux.org/thread/2WDNVZT6KZPOK6PXMDCCX7BAWWKYKCNF > I have asked to maintainer to update this package twice (points to a now-defunct project that I also own) and have received no response. ARM LLC is continuing to pressure us (ArmCord) to delete the armcord- bin AUR package, but we cannot merge it into legcord-bin as the current maintainer is MIA. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/SomeAspy/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/legcord/

9 months, 3 weeks

[aur-requests] [PRQ#1431] Deletion Request for hwinfo-src

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

gim [1] filed a deletion request for hwinfo-src [2]: Duplicate package. "hwinfo" already exists in official repository. Maintainer says that "this package you can install in archlinux-arm, hwinfo from community doesn't work on it". Can't ABS resolve this kind of issues? Anyway, I couldn't find anything in ArchWiki about this kind of exceptions which allows to upload such duplicates, so I'm assuming it was uploaded against the rules (https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR#Submitting_packages) It also applies to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libx86emu-src/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/gim/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hwinfo-src/

10 years, 9 months

Re: [PRQ#47043] Deletion Request for libretro-pocketsnes-git

by Marcell Meszaros

AUR's libretro-snes9x-git PKGBUILD allows ARM architectures, and the ArchLinuxARM.org repos carry stable packages for the same platforms. On 6 September 2023 17:46:51 GMT+02:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for libretro-pocketsnes-git [2]: > >Unneeded, unmaintained VCS package from 2015. > >Upstream no longer exists under this name: >the successor project is called snes9x. > >There are packages for both standalone and LibRetro builds of that in >Arch extra repo, as well as git VCS equivalents of those on AUR. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libretro-pocketsnes-git/

1 year, 11 months

Re: [PRQ#51236] Deletion Request for widevine-aarch64 Accepted

by Claudia Pellegrino

Hi Antiz, > @Auerhuhn AUR packages can support **additional** architectures than > x86_64 (which is the only officially supported one), but not be > specific to them. > As such, ARM specific packages are not allowed: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#arch Got it, thanks for the pointer! > Also, please refrain from pushing back previously deleted packages. It was an honest mistake: Deletion occurred right after I flagged the package out-of-date. That’s why I wrongly assumed that it was the package maintainer who deleted it. I was also unaware of the ongoing clean-up effort. Anyway, thanks again for the info! Regards Auerhuhn

1 year, 9 months

Re: [PRQ#51247] Deletion Request for linux-rockchip-rk3588-bin

by Marcell Meszaros

Also this has just been deleted in response to PRQ#51067 that I submitted. In it, I gave pointers to maintainer about the specific Arch packaging guideline requiring x86_64 or 'any' arch support, and also a link to the ArchLinuxARM.org forum for User Submitted Packages. [a] [a]: https://lists.archlinux.org/hyperkitty/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.or… On 15 November 2023 01:06:11 GMT+01:00, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >muflone [1] filed a deletion request for linux-rockchip-rk3588-bin >[2]: > >AUR is not the correct place for arm specific packages. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/muflone/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/linux-rockchip-rk3588-bin/

1 year, 9 months

Re: [PRQ#41719] Deletion Request for wpewebkit-bin

by Andrea Giammarchi

This is not unmaintained. Life happened and I need to put back my setup to be able to build all the related packages. There's only this package pre-built and it takes hours to build it too so it'd be a shame if I can't update (sooner than later) this in the near future. On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 2:24 AM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for wpewebkit-bin [2]: > > Unmaintained package. > > Old duplicate of [extra] wpewebkit. > > ArchLinuxARM also carries the ARM binaries. > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wpewebkit-bin/

2 years, 2 months

[PRQ#51751] Deletion Request for armv8l-linux-gnueabihf-gdb

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for armv8l-linux-gnueabihf-gdb [2]: Unmaintained ARMv8 cross-compiler toolchain package from 2017. For the 64-bit supporting ARMv8 platform, but for kernels running in 32-bit mode. I recommend deletion. It is not useful to keep as is. And almost all related toolchain packages have already been deleted from AUR, because they were similarly abandoned (all from 2017). Also, Arch Linux ARM does not support this architecture target, and e.g. the Android project explicitly chose not to support this, as it makes no mainstream practical sense to run kernel and user processes in 32-bit on ARMv8 64-bit HW. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/armv8l-linux-gnueabihf-gdb/

1 year, 8 months

[PRQ#59771] Deletion Request for widevine

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for widevine [2]: Re-filing a deletion request due to not receiving any response from @Muflone [a] about the rationale to keep this duplicate of the properly packaged AUR/chromium-widevine. [b] This package was created with the sole purpose of offering ARM support, and x86_64 was only added to mask its intent. Also I believe it is not okay to create duplicates on AUR when there is already a maintained package which works with Arch Linux. AUR/widevine's maintainer should collaborate with that of AUR/chromium-widevine and suggest enhancements there. [a]: https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/IAHLWRGRNHHUZRU2LRMX5UTZUNGJBAUO/#5CT5XAQZNIHQYPSRZ6CMDTY67XE3QOU2 [b]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/chromium-widevine [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/widevine/

1 year, 3 months

Aur-requests search results for query "arm"