Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[aur-requests] [PRQ#19943] Deletion Request for dolphin-root-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

DUS2002 [1] filed a deletion request for dolphin-root-git [2]: Isn't well done the package. Just sorry for bad making it, so as I didn't understand the rules for submitting the package, I request it's deletion. Sorry for doing bad things here [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/DUS2002/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dolphin-root-git/

5 years, 5 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4388] Deletion Request for sly-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

haawda [1] filed a deletion request for sly-git [2]: I will upload a renamed version of this package (emacs-sly-git) as there are name clashes with a javascript library and a guile-written game engine. There is nothing to merge yet, so I file a deletion request. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/haawda/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sly-git/

10 years, 1 month

[aur-requests] [PRQ#4949] Deletion Request for ruby-crass

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

jetm [1] filed a deletion request for ruby-crass [2]: Request deletion. Initially was created as dependency for another package, but it's no longer needed. If someone still want to use it, can be installed with gem. I am ruby-crass package maintainer. Thanks. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jetm/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ruby-crass/

9 years, 9 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13670] Deletion Request for jdatestamp

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

polyzen [1] filed a deletion request for jdatestamp [2]: Requires a package up for deletion, and both are vaporware. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2018-December/028870.html [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/polyzen/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jdatestamp/

6 years, 11 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#18560] Deletion Request for opencl-amd

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

kode54 [1] filed a deletion request for opencl-amd [2]: I wish to rescind my request for deletion, on the grounds that I can do better with this, and will resume updating it as necessary. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/kode54/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/opencl-amd/

5 years, 8 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#23920] Deletion Request for ino

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

morgenstern [1] filed a deletion request for ino [2]: Already approved for deletion: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2021-February/049739.html [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/morgenstern/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ino/

4 years, 9 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#23983] Deletion Request for python2-jukebox

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

fryfrog [1] filed a deletion request for python2-jukebox [2]: This software hasn't been updated since 2013 and is the only thing depending on python2-django-rest-framework which I've also requested for deletion. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/fryfrog/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-jukebox/

4 years, 9 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27262] Deletion Request for octoprint

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

Jake [1] filed a deletion request for octoprint [2]: "Installs octoprint into a venv" too, this is apparently enough for direct deletion: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- requests/2021-July/056724.html [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Jake/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/octoprint/

4 years, 4 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32098] Deletion Request for lib32-caps

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-caps [2]: Unmaintained since 5 years, and seems not needed anymore. Same is true for its only AUR dependent, lib32-alsaequal (deletion request submitted). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-caps/

3 years, 10 months

[PRQ#61626] Deletion Request for netcfg-wireguard

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

dreieck [1] filed a deletion request for netcfg-wireguard [2]: Since a deletion request was filed for `netcfg-git` with the comment > Upstream is no longer maintained since ~2013 a deletion request here makes sense in the same way as over there, since `netcfg-wireguard` depends on `netcfg`. (If the other one is rejected, please also reject this one.) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dreieck/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/netcfg-wireguard/

1 year, 4 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"