Search results for "Deletion request for pkgbase" - Aur-requests

[PRQ#67280] Deletion Request for ocaml-http-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for ocaml-http-git [2]: Wanted to submit a deletion request instead of an orphan request. Package broken. Upstream discontinued 6 years ago. [a] Not compatible with repo's current ocaml v5. [a]: https://github.com/sacerdot/ocaml-http [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ocaml-http-git/

1 year

[PRQ#68005] Deletion Request for pnpm-cli

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for pnpm-cli [2]: Resubmit after deletion request PRQ#67431 got accepted. [a] Duplicate of Arch/extra/pnpm, uses prebuilt binaries despite upstream being open-source. [a]: http://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests(a)lists.archlinux.org/thread/VKV2SGMTBKHKULJDNK4HBV6UKVCFGRH6 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pnpm-cli/

11 months, 3 weeks

[aur-requests] [PRQ#1304] Deletion Request for buzzbird-git

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for buzzbird-git [2]: The project is unmaintained and nothing has been committed since 2011. In 2012 appeared a message that reports, that this project doesn't work with newer xulrunner versions. Upstream dead, non working, no active forks. I vote for deletion [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/buzzbird-git/

11 years, 1 month

Re: [PRQ#44363] Deletion Request for falco

by Fabio Loli

> kris-nova [1] filed a deletion request for falco [2]: > > Trying to understand how to delete the package > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/kris-nova/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/falco/ A deletion request for this is already pending, Trusted Users will take care of that. You can submit one for falco-ebpf and falco-bin if you want

2 years, 5 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#35293] Deletion Request for basilisk

by Fabio Loli

Il 11/06/22 19:50, notify--- via aur-requests ha scritto: > figue [1] filed a deletion request for basilisk [2]: > > In December of 2021, Basilisk was discontinued. Please, delete it. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Moon#Basilisk > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/figue/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/basilisk/ A deletion request is already pending, no need to make another one

3 years, 6 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#18779] Deletion Request for python-pytest-ordering

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

arisinfenix [1] filed a deletion request for python-pytest-ordering [2]: The python3 version is in [community]. When this deletion request gets accepted you can upload a python2 only version if still interested. Hopefully this is the right way to handle deletion requests for those python2/3 split packages that have a python3 but not python2 version in the official repos. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/arisinfenix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pytest-ordering/

5 years, 8 months

[aur-requests] [PRQ#17260] Deletion Request for pacfolder

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

kendfinger [1] filed a deletion request for pacfolder [2]: Although I am the maintainer, this has not been updated in 5 years and the project it is based on is defunct. I am recommending deletion as I do not intend to maintain my own fork of the project. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/kendfinger/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pacfolder/

5 years, 11 months

[PRQ#45600] Deletion Request for gamejolt-client

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for gamejolt-client [2]: Please don't add non-functional packages to the AUR. See the comments and address the issues before this deletion request comes up in the queue. If the issues are addressed in the meantime, I'll close this request. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gamejolt-client/

2 years, 4 months

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#12609] Deletion Request for tracktion-7

by Robin Broda

On 9/3/18 11:20 PM, notify--- via aur-requests wrote: > Chida [1] filed a deletion request for tracktion-7 [2]: > > Not working anymore > > [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Chida/ > [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tracktion-7/ > Sounds like an orphan request would be more appropriate than a deletion request. -- Rob (coderobe) O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org

7 years

[aur-requests] [PRQ#35310] Deletion Request for lib32-openssl098

by notify＠aur.archlinux.org

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-openssl098 [2]: Only the defunct and orphaned labview-2010 depends on this legacy lib32-openssl now (deletion request for the latter submitted separately). I'd say it's safe to delete this package as it is not needed anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-openssl098/

3 years, 6 months

Aur-requests search results for query "Deletion request for pkgbase"