[arch-dev-public] Gimp-2.4 beta to current?
belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA
Thu Aug 23 20:41:35 EDT 2007
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Tobias Kieslich wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Eric Belanger wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
>>> On 8/17/07, Tobias Kieslich <tobias at justdreams.de> wrote:
>>>> I like to bring gimp-2.4 (rc1) to current. the 2.3.x is fairly stable
>>>> for a while and I actually use it exclusively. Any objections?
>>> Any reason it can't go in unstable or testing? No need to bump out the
>>> stable 2.2.X release...
>> Agree, we could update the gimp-devel package in unstable to 2.4rc1. That
>> way, users will have the choice between the stable 2.2 in current or the
>> 2.4rc in unstable.
> We used to have the gimp devel styuff in current once it reached some
> mature state before. But it's fine we can also leave it. Was just an
> idea. So someone wanna update unstable?
I just updated gimp-devel to 2.4rc1.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the arch-dev-public