[arch-dev-public] [signoff] shell rebuilds
belanger at ASTRO.UMontreal.CA
Sun Dec 2 16:30:03 EST 2007
On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Travis Willard wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 2:56 PM, Dan McGee <dpmcgee at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 28, 2007 8:46 PM, Eric Belanger <belanger at astro.umontreal.ca>
>>> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Dan McGee wrote:
>>>> Looking for a signoff for i686 for the following packages in testing:
>>>> dash (new)
>>>> Most of the updates deal with adding a new shell and a new provide
>>>> (sh), and the update to shadow is to remove its dependency on
>>>> coreutils which was one of our remaining circular dependencies.
>>>> I'd appreciate it if someone wanted to rebuild these for x86_64- I
>>>> wouldn't feel comfortable building a core package outside a chroot,
>>>> which I currently do not have access to.
>>> I'll build the x86_64 pkg.
>> Um...anyone? Otherwise I'm just going to assume they are fine by the
>> end of today.h
> That's not the way signoffs work. You CAN'T just 'assume' they are fine.
> You have to wait. Sorry, but it breaks the whole system otherwise.
Actually, these packages were already signed off by two devs: Dan for i686
and me for x86_64. From an IRC discussion with Aaron, the devs who put the
packages in testing counts as one of the two signoff. That might seem
strange but it's the way it works unless the signoffs gets a better
> Signed off for i686 (bash, dash, shadow, hwdetect)
> However, question about filesystem:
> $ pacman -Ql filesystem
> filesystem /etc/arch-release
> filesystem /etc/crypttab
> filesystem /etc/fstab
> filesystem /etc/group
> filesystem /etc/gshadow
> filesystem /etc/host.conf
> filesystem /etc/hosts
> filesystem /etc/issue
> filesystem /etc/ld.so.conf
> filesystem /etc/motd
> filesystem /etc/nsswitch.conf
> filesystem /etc/passwd
> filesystem /etc/protocols
> filesystem /etc/resolv.conf
> filesystem /etc/securetty
> filesystem /etc/services
> filesystem /etc/shadow
> filesystem /etc/shells
> Isn't it supposed to have a bunch of empty directories in it too (for FHS
> compliance and such)? Otherwise, signed off.
The empty directories are in the packages (run tar -tzvf on the
packages). 'pacman -Ql' doesn't list directories as they are not really
owned by any packages.
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the arch-dev-public