[arch-dev-public] signoff sudo 1.6.9p9 for i686

[Eric Belanger]

On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Paul Mattal wrote:

> Pierre Schmitz wrote:
>> Perhaps a short comment within the PKGBUILD might be usefull to explain such
>> things.
>
> I have reverted the changed, added such a comment, and moved the already
> signed-off i686 package to core.
>
> - P
>


For the license, it might have been better to simply use 
license=('custom')
By having 'ISC' by itself, it implies that ISC is one of the common 
licenses which it is not.

Also, in the future, can we keep the packages in testing until it get 
signed off for both architectures? Apart from the fact that it will be 
more foolproof  as more people had looked at it, we should try to keep the 
repo for the 2 architectures as in sync as possible. Otherwise, we might get 
complaints and bug reports about why the x86_64 package is still in 
testing. Also, it is simpler for us to keep track because it will be hard 
to tell after some time why the x86_64 package is still in testing. Is it 
because it's waiting to be signed off, because no-one noticed that it was 
signed off shortly afterward or if it was just forgotten?

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.